Finally! Sanctions or Israel if they derail peace talks!
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178198/kerrys-israel-palestine-plan-will-challenge-aipac#
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178198/kerrys-israel-palestine-plan-will-challenge-aipac#

There goes the Jewish vote.![]()
So how is this in anyway appeasement? Hmmm? Just trollling again?
So how is this in anyway appeasement? Hmmm? Just trollling again?
Refusing to impose sanctions on Iran because "diplomacy must be allowed to work" isn't appeasement?
Your confused, this is about sanctions on Israel not Iran.
Did you read the linked article in the OP, Counselor?
"If AIPAC hadn’t confronted the White House over Iran—and lost—it might have more muscle now to fight the Obama-Kerry plan for Israel-Palestine. Instead, AIPAC has alienated the White House and, no doubt, lost credibility with some members of Congress, especially in the Democratic Party...
Obama said flatly that he won’t stand for any congressional meddling on Iran:
Let me be clear: if this Congress sends me a new sanctions bill now that threatens to derail these talks, I will veto it. For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed."
www.thenation.com/blog/178198/kerrys-israel-palestine-plan-will-challenge-aipac#
That portion is not what this thread was about. You are simply being silly.
This would be a big step forward, I hope it happens. I do like this: "Let me be clear: if this Congress sends me a new sanctions bill now that threatens to derail these talks, I will veto it. For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed."
Finally! Sanctions or Israel if they derail peace talks!
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178198/kerrys-israel-palestine-plan-will-challenge-aipac#
There goes the Jewish vote.![]()
It is what Darlas' comment was about, Counselor. You may recall thanking her for it.
This would be a big step forward, I hope it happens.
I do like this:
"Let me be clear: if this Congress sends me a new sanctions bill now that threatens to derail these talks, I will veto it. For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed."
That portion is not what this thread was about. You are simply being silly.
Include her entire post and you can see what it was about..
This would be a big step forward, I hope it happens. I do like this: "Let me be clear: if this Congress sends me a new sanctions bill now that threatens to derail these talks, I will veto it. For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed."
Can you quote the portion that said there would be sanctions on Israel?