Billionaire Leon Cooperman pulling Columbia funding amid student protests: These kids

ExpressLane

Verified User
Billionaire Leon Cooperman pulling Columbia funding amid student protests: These kids have ‘sh-- for brains’

Columbia University graduate, billionaire investor and Omega Advisors CEO Leon Cooperman had harsh words for Ivy League students who are sharing anti-Israel sentiment on campus.

"These kids at the colleges have sh-- for brains," Cooperman told "The Claman Countdown" host Liz Claman on Wednesday. "We have one reliable ally in the Middle East. That's Israel. We only have one democracy in the Middle East. That's Israel. And we have one economy tolerant of different people, gays, lesbians, etc. That's Israel. So they have no idea what these young kids are doing."

"Now, the real shame is, I've given to Columbia probably about $50 million over many years," he continued. "And I'm going to suspend my giving. I'll give my giving to other organizations."

Cooperman doubled down on his stance to no longer donate to the Ivy League school, expressing his disgust over staff members who refuse to condemn terrorist acts.

"I told [Columbia] that they should fire this professor that made the comments he made. I mean, war is hell. This war is not good for anybody," Cooperman said. "But to praise what Hamas did is disgraceful. Disgusting."......


=========================

He is 100% correct they do have sh** for brains. Hit Columbia where it hurts. In their pocketbook. That is the only way to get their attention.
 
That’s Leon’s right, he should do what he feels is right, Columbia isn’t going to under, it is a nonentity
 
There are a handful of really big Jewish donors who have announced they are no longer giving to their alma maters based on what they felt like was lack of support for Jewish students. As I've read the argument, Universities will speak out against police violence (George Floyd) and gun violence but when Jews are now victims of terrorist attacks they've equivocated.
 
WSJ article from a couple of days ago:



Elite Universities Face Donor Revolt Over Mideast Conflict

Some wealthy alums say response to Hamas attacks was final straw after years of growing disenchantment


David Magerman was in Israel celebrating a holiday by dancing with a Torah in synagogue when Hamas attacked the country earlier this month. When his alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania, put out a statement a few days later that called the assault “horrific” but didn’t explicitly condemn Hamas, he was incensed.

Magerman, a hedge-fund veteran turned venture capitalist who has donated millions to the school, has since cut his ties with Penn. “I was just pushed over the edge by the equivocation of the response,” he said.

Top universities such as Harvard and Penn are facing backlash from alumni angry about the schools’ reactions to the attacks and their aftermath. The alumni say their schools didn’t move quickly and forcefully enough to condemn Hamas and denounce antisemitism after the Oct. 7 attacks, and that they have done a poor job since then protecting Jewish students as on-campus tensions rise.

Some say it was the final straw after years of growing disenchantment with the schools over what they see as a leftward political shift. Many big donors have announced plans to stop giving or said they are reconsidering future gifts.

The pullback could dent the finances of some universities that rely on big givers to fill their coffers. People giving $1 million or more made up less than 1% of donors but 57% of total donations across surveyed U.S. universities, according to a study by the Council for Advancement and Support of Education covering the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

At Harvard, more than 30 student groups signed a letter laying blame for Hamas’s violence on Israel’s treatment of Palestinians over decades. University leaders, including new President Claudine Gay, wrote on Oct. 9 to the Harvard community that they were “heartbroken by the death and destruction unleashed by the attack by Hamas.” The statement attracted criticism from former Harvard President Larry Summers and others for not distancing Harvard from the student groups’ stance and for not explicitly condemning Hamas.

On Oct. 10, Gay followed up with a note explicitly condemning “the terrorist atrocities perpetrated by Hamas” and saying student groups don’t speak for Harvard. She shared another statement via video two days later.

Retail billionaire Leslie Wexner’s foundation said it would cut financial ties with Harvard and end a program it funded at the school for Israelis. Wexner and his wife have donated more than $42 million to the Cambridge, Mass., university.

On Monday, a group of prominent alumni including Mitt Romney and investors Seth Klarman and Bill Helman published an open letter to Harvard criticizing the school’s leadership in what they described as an increasingly hostile environment for Harvard’s Jewish students. The group outlined steps it said the school should take, such as restricting campus protests to enrolled students and creating and making mandatory a semester-long class on critical thinking and fact-finding. “We fear that history is on the verge of repeating itself,” the letter said.

Penn faces perhaps the biggest donor revolt. Prominent alumni such as cosmetics tycoon Ronald Lauder and Apollo Global Management chief executive Marc Rowan had already clashed with the school last month when it hosted a Palestinian literary festival they believed showed the university was tolerant of antisemitism.

Top school officials released a statement condemning antisemitism ahead of the literary festival. Following the Hamas attacks, University President Liz Magill wrote on Oct. 10: “We are devastated by the horrific assault on Israel by Hamas that targeted civilians and the taking of hostages over the weekend.”

On Oct. 15, she issued a follow-up statement condemning Hamas.

“When the university wants to say something, it knows how and it can say it forcefully,” Rowan, chair of the board of advisers at Penn’s Wharton School, told The Wall Street Journal. “And the university doesn’t seem to be able to find its voice with respect to antisemitism.” Rowan said he was disturbed when he saw Magill post about her dog on Instagram the weekend of the attacks.

He said the response to the Hamas attacks was a departure from the school’s strong condemnations of the killing of George Floyd and the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Rowan, who has donated more than $50 million to Penn, has said he won’t give more unless Magill and Board of Trustees Chair Scott Bok step down.

Jon Huntsman Jr. sent Magill a letter saying that his family is halting contributions. One of the most prominent buildings on campus is named after his father, businessman Jon Huntsman Sr. Lauder, after whom a university degree program is named, sent a letter saying he is reconsidering future gifts. Investor Jonathon Jacobson said he would donate $1 a year until Magill “find employment elsewhere.”

The university lost out on two donations worth more than $150 million combined in the past year over the school’s policies, Rowan said.

Donors gave more than $1.5 billion to Penn the last two fiscal years ended in June, the school said. Annual distributions from Penn’s $20.9 billion endowment provide 17% of the university’s academic operating budget.

Marc Rowan, who has donated more than $50 million to Penn, said he won’t give more unless the university’s president and the board of trustees chair step down.

Donating to higher education has long been almost automatic for many wealthy people. “The donors we work with might see their alma mater giving as like their religious tithe,” said Mae Hong, a regional vice president at Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, which helps wealthy families plan their giving. “It’s kind of just their duty.”

Most give to universities out of appreciation for their education, though donations can also help their children get an admissions advantage, she said. “It’s just going to be a much more complicated relationship going forward,” Hong said.

In the past few years, dissident alumni groups have started cropping up for people who believe progressive groupthink has taken over college campuses. Several significant donors said they don’t want to force their worldviews on anyone, but that they do want college students to be exposed to a diversity of views and be able to engage in robust dialogue.

“I have long been dismayed at the drift away from true freedom of thought, expression and speech at our best universities, very much including my beloved alma mater Penn,” hedge fund manager Cliff Asness wrote to Magill on Oct. 16 about his plans to stop giving. “I do not like making something like this about money—but it appears to be one of the only paths that has any hope of mattering.”

Scott Shay donated to Northwestern University every year after earning his undergraduate degree in 1979. He stopped in 2020 after researching a book on antisemitic conspiracy theories on campus. The former chairman of Signature Bank, which failed earlier this year, he now donates to the Hillel and Chabad organizations at the university instead.

After the Hamas attacks, other donors have reached out to him saying they are reconsidering their gifts. “I’ve heard from four people within the last hour,” Shay said Friday.


https://www.wsj.com/us-news/educati...e-donor-revolt-over-mideast-conflict-6c93662f
 
There are a handful of really big Jewish donors who have announced they are no longer giving to their alma maters based on what they felt like was lack of support for Jewish students. As I've read the argument, Universities will speak out against police violence (George Floyd) and gun violence but when Jews are now victims of terrorist attacks they've equivocated.
Indeed. I can't imagine a student with a Jewish surname feels welcomed in class with a bunch of these protestors or with professors who openly support terrorism against the Jews. It's amazing when they won't allow someone like Riley Gaines to speak but they will allow this.
 
So, you right wingers do not believe in free speech.

A billionaire makes donations to a college. He disagrees with the speech of a professor there and the college tacitly supporting it. He pulls his donations. That's free speech too. You have the right to speak freely in the US, but you also have to recognize that speech can have consequences. In this case, someone else disagreed with your speech and took his money and went elsewhere. Liberal arts colleges in America today are some of the least free speech places in the country. Say the wrong thing, and you are finished at one.
 
Yes and they were punished for exercising their free speech.

Not by the state. Free speech only appliers to your right to express your opinions without being arrested for it.

It doesn't address the issue of how people will feel about it, even a little bit.
 
What do you think about the White House and the FBI trying to get Twitter to shut down free speech?

I don't think that truly intelligent people see social media as anything but a sewer,
so any extra effort wasted on addressing it seems silly to me.

Nobody who expresses an opinion on X or Twitter is an important person in my estimation.
I have nom idea what they're saying.
I read the newspaper, and know the actual credentials of all the writers if I need to.
 
I don't think that truly intelligent people see social media as anything but a sewer,
so any extra effort wasted on addressing it seems silly to me.

Nobody who expresses an opinion on X or Twitter is an important person in my estimation.
I have nom idea what they're saying.
I read the newspaper, and know the actual credentials of all the writers if I need to.

Lots of people get their news from social media. The White House and the FBI help block the New York Post's Hunter laptop story. And it was sport on accurate and the FBI and presumably the White House KNEW it was not Russian disinformation. That is election interference by the government.
 
Back
Top