Big Brother in Tehran: Iran deploys drones, AI and facial recognition to enforce hijab law

serendipity

Verified User
Does anybody want to accuse me of Islamophobia? I'm pretty sure that none of the women including soy bois like Crypiss will just ignore this in their inimitable fashion.

Big Brother in Tehran: Iran deploys drones, AI and facial recognition to enforce hijab law

 
"... it's a backward, paternalistic, male-dominated society that set up a system that treats women like crap."

When are Y O U and the other brave men of JPP going to Iran to teach these testosterone-overloaded creatures a lesson?

Better yet, when are trump and his bullies going to stand up for the women of Iran?
 




iu
 
Does anybody want to accuse me of Islamophobia? I'm pretty sure that none of the women including soy bois like Crypiss will just ignore this in their inimitable fashion.

Big Brother in Tehran: Iran deploys drones, AI and facial recognition to enforce hijab law

So Biden enabled Iran and Trump is confronting Iran. Libratards don't care about how women in Iran are treated
 
Does anybody want to accuse me of Islamophobia? I'm pretty sure that none of the women including soy bois like Crypiss will just ignore this in their inimitable fashion.

Big Brother in Tehran: Iran deploys drones, AI and facial recognition to enforce hijab law

MAGAts want something like this to keep a track of women and LGBT.
 
Hook line and sinker.


I was hoping she'd try her lame excuses again.

So the society isn't this restrictive because of Islam but in spite of Islam.

When Middle East correspondent Carla Power began studying the Koran with a

 
You love Cats and Cats love Rats so You love Rats A=B and B=C so A=C
  • Premise 1: You love cats.
  • Premise 2: Cats love rats.
  • Conclusion: You love rats.
The fallacy here is one of equivocation or a failure to establish a necessary transitive relationship. Just because you love something (cats) and that something loves something else (rats), it doesn’t logically follow that you must love the second thing (rats). Love isn’t a transitive property—your preferences don’t automatically extend through the preferences of what you love. For example, if you love a friend and your friend loves spicy food, it doesn’t mean you love spicy food. The conclusion only holds if there’s an additional premise, like "You love everything that cats love," which isn’t provided.

So, no, it doesn’t mean you love rats. The reasoning commits a logical error by assuming a connection that isn’t justified by the premises alone.

Grok
 
Back
Top