Ben Carson to Donald Trump: Stop Calling Hillary Clinton a ‘Bigot’

Bill

Malarkeyville

Ben Carson, the former presidential candidate and adviser to Donald Trump, wants the GOP nominee to stop calling his opponent a racist.

“I don’t generally get into the name-calling thing,” Carson said in a phone interview with The Daily Beast on Friday morning. “I kind of left that behind in the third grade. I certainly don’t encourage it because the issues that we’re facing are incredibly important—for us and for the future generations.”

On Thursday, Trump defended calling his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton a “bigot.” A term with which he’s taken to describing her this past week.

“She is a bigot,” he said in a CNN interview. “She is selling them [African Americans] down the tubes because she's not doing anything for those communities. She talks a good game. But she doesn’t do anything.”

During a rally in New Hampshire on the same day, at which Carson introduced him, Trump assailed Clinton for saying that his voters are racists. (She did not characterize them monolithically like this but rather pointed to a number of troublesome connections between Trump and white nationalists in a sharp critique of the candidate in Reno yesterday).

But Carson—an often contemplative counterpart to Trump’s brash, bullying persona—said that he would not call Clinton a bigot, echoing the same sentiment as RNC spokesperson Sean Spicer, who chose not to use the word on MSNBC Friday morning.

“That’s what people do who don’t have anything to talk about,
” Carson said of name-calling on both sides of the aisle. He said that it is the media’s responsibility to help guide candidates away from such attacks, despite the fact that Trump himself is the one who often perpetuates these self-inflicted errors.

Carson attended a meeting in Trump Tower on Thursday morning directed at beginning a process of outreach by the Trump campaign to the African-American community; a tall order for a candidate polling in the single digits with black voters in the final two months of his campaign. It’s a task made even more difficult by Trump’s history with housing discrimination and championing the birther movement.

But Carson is hopeful that Trump showing interest in issues relevant to the community will help him gain traction. He said that Democrats take black votes for granted while not providing real solutions so there’s an opening for Trump to offer a new option in the Republican party.

“The important thing is that he has started the process,” Carson asserted. “As you know, the Republican Party has been relatively missing in action when it comes to reaching out to minority communities in recent decades. I think particularly in the African-American community, a large number of people recognize that the Democrats have not done diddly-squat for them. But they don’t feel that they have any other place to go.”

In an attempt to give them another option, Trump’s campaign has planned to start visiting African-American communities, beginning with a visit to Carson’s hometown of Detroit on Sept. 3.

The former neurosurgeon’s place in the Trump orbit has waxed and waned this year, often with the former playing referee on some of Trump’s most vicious attacks. In June, Carson said it was a bad idea to attack Clinton over her faith. He also cautioned against Trump attacking judge Gonzalo Curiel over his ethnicity, saying that it was indicative of a “moral descent.”

That pattern continues today. Trump and some of his surrogates have publicly speculated about the health of Clinton, with Trump frequently commenting on her lack of “stamina,” while Carson, the only licensed medical practitioner of the bunch, has taken a different tack. He thinks that more medical information about both candidates should be publicized.

“There are plenty of people who are in their 60s, 70s, or 80s who are fit, healthy, and perfectly capable of vigorous activities,” Carson said (Trump is 70 and Clinton is 68). “When you get into that age range, obviously there’s more concern than somebody who is in their 30s or 40s. So it is not at all an unreasonable expectation to know about their health status.”

He implored both of the candidates to release even more up-to-date medical information.

More @ source
 
The alt right cucks take no notice of Dr. Carson.


A_world_without_jews_and_blacks.jpg




AN ALT RIGHT CARTOON FROM 4CHAN
 
Trump should only call Hillary the same names she has called him......lol.......fair is fair.....
 
Hrc has zero chance to win doing that.
She is a.bigot so it's not a name, it's an an adjective.

hahaha..... I think you mean trumpf....

He calls names, speaks over others talking etc because he can't win in a debate.......

That is why she shouldn't bother to debate him....
 
hahaha..... I think you mean trumpf....

He calls names, speaks over others talking etc because he can't win in a debate.......

That is why she shouldn't bother to debate him....

He does that because he's from NYC.
She dare not debate him because she's slow on her feet and her policies (BOS policies) are failed and they cannot be defended. And they do occur after her bedtime.
 
He does that because he's from NYC.
She dare not debate him because she's slow on her feet and her policies (BOS policies) are failed and they cannot be defended. And they do occur after her bedtime.

Hey fuck you, I lived in the city for years...lol

For whatever reasons he does it, he does it....... Honestly, you think he knows about foreign affairs?? I would bet he couldn't locate half the countries on the planet nor half the states in the country.........

No idea of history, law, or the constitution so how is he going to respect the constitution when he has no idea what it even says??
 
Hey fuck you, I lived in the city for years...lol

For whatever reasons he does it, he does it....... Honestly, you think he knows about foreign affairs?? I would bet he couldn't locate half the countries on the planet nor half the states in the country.........

No idea of history, law, or the constitution so how is he going to respect the constitution when he has no idea what it even says??

Well, Obama is almost nearly a constitutional scholar but you'd never know it lol.

Part of what's wrong with our government is the other branches of government don't check the executive branches power. For example, there's no way under the constitution Obama should be able to decree [yes, that's the right word] that the states need to do this or that with their restroom laws.

It's a stupid issue, but it's a good example of executive over reach. In a more healthy republic, the courts would step in and say, 'wait a minute, you can't do that'. But the way the executive gets around that is to appoint ideologues to court positions.

Liberals are okay with Obama's over reach, obviously. But there's a chance karma would bite them in ass under a Trump presidency---and they know it.

Knowledge of foreign affairs is great, but I actually think it's less important than a candidates world view. Look at Hillary and/or Obama. Obama didn't know much about foreign affairs in 2008, but he does now.

They both know Russia, China and Middle East well enough to teach a college level course on it. But neither of them have any business making foreign affairs decisions because they're both either naive and/or ideologically committed to spreading democracy; or deluded by the notion that being nice to Iran will make them like us.

Trump needs to learn foreign policy but he isn't an ideologue; nor does he think being nice to international bullies gets you anywhere. I'm all but certain he wouldn't have signed off on the recent treaty with Iran. He entertains no politically correct delusions about Islam and it's effect on global affairs.

The rest can be learned. Also, there's a reason presidents appoint advisors--it's impossible to be an expert on everything.
 
Well, Obama is almost nearly a constitutional scholar but you'd never know it lol.

Part of what's wrong with our government is the other branches of government don't check the executive branches power. For example, there's no way under the constitution Obama should be able to decree [yes, that's the right word] that the states need to do this or that with their restroom laws.

It's a stupid issue, but it's a good example of executive over reach. In a more healthy republic, the courts would step in and say, 'wait a minute, you can't do that'. But the way the executive gets around that is to appoint ideologues to court positions.

Liberals are okay with Obama's over reach, obviously. But there's a chance karma would bite them in ass under a Trump presidency---and they know it.

Knowledge of foreign affairs is great, but I actually think it's less important than a candidates world view. Look at Hillary and/or Obama. Obama didn't know much about foreign affairs in 2008, but he does now.

They both know Russia, China and Middle East well enough to teach a college level course on it. But neither of them have any business making foreign affairs decisions because they're both either naive and/or ideologically committed to spreading democracy; or deluded by the notion that being nice to Iran will make them like us.

Trump needs to learn foreign policy but he isn't an ideologue; nor does he think being nice to international bullies gets you anywhere. I'm all but certain he wouldn't have signed off on the recent treaty with Iran. He entertains no politically correct delusions about Islam and it's effect on global affairs.

The rest can be learned. Also, there's a reason presidents appoint advisors--it's impossible to be an expert on everything.

Some good points..

Knowing history & recent knowledge/political events etc is very important IMHO.. Like the war in "Indo-China", Viet Nam had a strong historical animosity w/ China & for good reasons & yet our gubment seemed oblivious to it... Contrary to popular opinion, ignorance is rarely bliss, especially on this scale..

Yea, the down side of our system is you can get ppl that are woefully unqualified making decisions that have an affect on us & the world..

Presidential over reach is pretty common & the other branches do look the other way most of the time but that balance is hardly what our local "constitutional experts" say it is....... It is what the Supreme court of the moment says it, & really that's that, right or wrong in our eyes..
 
So now libs think Ben is a notable commentator. I thought he was a black idiot Dr. But he says one thing against Trump, now he's awesome.

Libtardism 101.
 
Well, Obama is almost nearly a constitutional scholar but you'd never know it lol.

Part of what's wrong with our government is the other branches of government don't check the executive branches power. For example, there's no way under the constitution Obama should be able to decree [yes, that's the right word] that the states need to do this or that with their restroom laws.

It's a stupid issue, but it's a good example of executive over reach. In a more healthy republic, the courts would step in and say, 'wait a minute, you can't do that'. But the way the executive gets around that is to appoint ideologues to court positions.

Liberals are okay with Obama's over reach, obviously. But there's a chance karma would bite them in ass under a Trump presidency---and they know it.

Knowledge of foreign affairs is great, but I actually think it's less important than a candidates world view. Look at Hillary and/or Obama. Obama didn't know much about foreign affairs in 2008, but he does now.

They both know Russia, China and Middle East well enough to teach a college level course on it. But neither of them have any business making foreign affairs decisions because they're both either naive and/or ideologically committed to spreading democracy; or deluded by the notion that being nice to Iran will make them like us.

Trump needs to learn foreign policy but he isn't an ideologue; nor does he think being nice to international bullies gets you anywhere. I'm all but certain he wouldn't have signed off on the recent treaty with Iran. He entertains no politically correct delusions about Islam and it's effect on global affairs.

The rest can be learned. Also, there's a reason presidents appoint advisors--it's impossible to be an expert on everything.

Actually Obama wasn't a professor who "taught" Const. Law. He was a lecturer.

This is a person who doesn't do research and isn't tenured. Lecturers are like subs. And sometimes they are brought on in an alumni capacity if they donate enough.

But the libtard media did ZERO vetting of Obama. Which is why we had 8 years of failure.
 
So now libs think Ben is a notable commentator. I thought he was a black idiot Dr. But he says one thing against Trump, now he's awesome.

Libtardism 101.
yes. Carson never had a clue.
Being a lecturer on Constitutional law doesn't mean Obama respected it in his governance.
Anyone recall "I have a pen and a phone"?
 
So now libs think Ben is a notable commentator. I thought he was a black idiot Dr. But he says one thing against Trump, now he's awesome.

Libtardism 101.

lol.. He advised hillary to stop as well, something you would have known had you taken the time to actually read it...
 
Actually Obama wasn't a professor who "taught" Const. Law. He was a lecturer.

This is a person who doesn't do research and isn't tenured. Lecturers are like subs. And sometimes they are brought on in an alumni capacity if they donate enough.

But the libtard media did ZERO vetting of Obama. Which is why we had 8 years of failure.

UC Law School statement: The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/obama-a-constitutional-law-professor/
 
Back
Top