beigebook report

evince

Truthmatters
http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/beigebook/beigebook201210.htm


Real Estate and Construction
Residential real estate showed widespread improvement since the last report. All twelve Districts reported that existing home sales strengthened, in some cases substantially. Selling prices were steady or rising. Boston, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Dallas and San Francisco noted declining or tight inventories, which have put upward pressure on prices. Modest price increases were reported in the New York, Richmond, Chicago, and Kansas City Districts. New York and Richmond reported relatively strong demand at the high and low ends of the market, whereas Philadelphia and Kansas City noted relative strength for mid-range homes; Boston indicated a shift in the mix toward lower or medium priced homes. New home construction and sales were more mixed but still mostly improved: increased construction and/or new home sales were reported in the Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco Districts. Multi-family construction, in particular, was described as robust in the Boston, New York, Atlanta, Chicago, and Dallas Districts. Residential rental markets continued to be characterized as strong, even in the New York and Atlanta Districts where rents increased somewhat less strongly than in recent months.

Commercial real estate markets were mixed since the last report. Office markets showed signs of softening in the northeastern Districts--Boston, New York and Philadelphia--with New York remarking on substantial new supply coming on the market in early 2013. In contrast, Atlanta, Minneapolis and San Francisco noted some improvement, while most other Districts reported stable or mixed market conditions. Industrial markets showed some strength in the New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland and Atlanta Districts, while conditions were described as sluggish in Richmond and mixed in St. Louis. Atlanta noted weakness in the market for retail space. Commercial construction activity was also mixed: Atlanta, Minneapolis and Kansas City reported some improvement in non-residential construction activity, while Richmond and Dallas noted that activity was sluggish
 
You don't get it.


Allow me to explain.


When economic numbers look bad, the source is unimpeachable and Obama is to blame.


When economic numbers look good, the source is clearly suspicious and Obama is to blame.
 
This whole problem has been generated by people not having money to spend due to their mortage costing them too high a precent of their income.



Remember when the numbers started to change from the 30 percent that had been figured for a very long time for housing.


Now that the vast majority of these mortgages have run their course the market has hit bottom and is starting to grow again.


I suggest we never allow the same historically failed ideas that caused this mess be allowed to take harbour in any place of power.


Why the hell cant the people in this country LEARN from our past mistakes?

why do so many watch a mess evolve and explode and then want to TRY the very things that caused it yet again?
 
Last edited:
Remember when some of us said housing was not a good way to fuel an economy?

When some of us tried to tell you on the right that it was an unsustainable way to prop up an economy that it was NOT doing what the republicans claimed all the tax cuts would produce?


When will you on the right face this laufer Idea is an historically failed idea?


WHY will you just keep mouthing this stupid stuff NON stop after the disaster you just caused has been shown so clearly?


What do you gain?


please stop before you fulfill grover norquists wet dream of having our government so weak some pudgy 60 year old with power issues can drown it in a half full tub.
 
go look at the Bush economic number and extract from them the false economy under the mortgage mess.

what would that economy look like?

fucking shit.

that is what your hsitorically failed ideas would have produced in an economy if it were not then added to by a completely gamed up real estate market.


Why Why Why would you want that for America going forward.


To quote Samuel L Jacksaon.

Wake the fuck up
 
You are an economic illiterate. You are conflating issues to fuel your ideologic misconceptions.

Congratulations on taking an illogical premise and logically forging ahead to an illogical conclusion
 
fuck you very much

do you know how many times I have had fucking idiot ego inflated assholes like you tell me I dont know what Im talking about economically and then have me KICK their asses all over the fucking town with predicting what came next?



Cramm your false knowyer than thou crap back up dick Cheneys spincter.


Your IDEAS have failed yet again in history.

Face that fact fror once and all




YOUR IDEAS FAILED


give up your historically failed ideas
 
The ONLY reasons Bushs economy was NOT a complete failure was nionstop war spending ( off the books) and a bubble of monster purportions in the housing market created on Purpose by your idiot party so people would not notice how SHITTY more tax cuts and deregulation truely is as an economic solution to ANYTHING but making rich people richer.
 
Give us just one example in history where your ideas of tax cuts and deregualtion have given ANYONE in history the economy you people just keep claiming it will?


The evidence does not exsist.

You people are either LIARS or the dupes of LIARS.


so which one are you?
 
The ONLY reasons Bushs economy was NOT a complete failure was nionstop war spending ( off the books) and a bubble of monster purportions in the housing market created on Purpose by your idiot party so people would not notice how SHITTY more tax cuts and deregulation truely is as an economic solution to ANYTHING but making rich people richer.

The only thing worse than your spelling is your knowledge of economics. You continue to spout nonsense, yet think you are 'kicking ass'. It is truly comical.

The very fact that the loose standards in the mortgage industry are due to DEMOCRATIC policies escapes you. It was Democrats who wanted more of the sub prime debt issued in poorer neighborhoods. It was a Democrat who deregulated the financial sector. The tax cuts had nothing to do with the housing meltdown. Barney Frank, the champion of Fannie and Freddie, didn't listen when told there were escalating problems with F&F.

When in power in Congress in 2007, the Democrats did nothing to solve the problem. When they took over the White House in 2009 and had complete control of Congress, they did not resolve the issues that led to the meltdown.

Your Democrats have failed you Desh, yet you continue to pretend it is 'the right' whose policies have failed.
 
The only thing worse than your spelling is your knowledge of economics. You continue to spout nonsense, yet think you are 'kicking ass'. It is truly comical.

The very fact that the loose standards in the mortgage industry are due to DEMOCRATIC policies escapes you. It was Democrats who wanted more of the sub prime debt issued in poorer neighborhoods. It was a Democrat who deregulated the financial sector. The tax cuts had nothing to do with the housing meltdown. Barney Frank, the champion of Fannie and Freddie, didn't listen when told there were escalating problems with F&F.

When in power in Congress in 2007, the Democrats did nothing to solve the problem. When they took over the White House in 2009 and had complete control of Congress, they did not resolve the issues that led to the meltdown.

Your Democrats have failed you Desh, yet you continue to pretend it is 'the right' whose policies have failed.




super jsut fuck off with your idiot lies .

I was right and you were wrong.


want the links again
 
Tell us Desh... why did Carter begin mass deregulation?

Why did Clinton lower the capital gains tax rate? You know, that place where the wealthy derive the bulk of their income from?
 
super jsut fuck off with your idiot lies .

I was right and you were wrong.

want the links again

No Desh, you simply are confused. You have no clue what you are talking about and your 'links' proved that. Which is why you ran away from those threads once it was shown how fucking retarded you are on the topic.

You simply shout 'lies' as if that makes it so. The same stupid thing Obama continues to do. It is as if you and he think we cannot look up the actual facts. That you think people will simply go 'well, they said it was a lie, thus it must be so'.

You are an idiot desh. An idiot who thinks she understands economics. You clearly do not.
 
Now prove what you say is true

You deny the economic boom that took place from 1982-2000? Yet you proclaim to be 'kicking ass'. LMAO.

Carter began the deregulation Desh. Clinton cut capital gains tax rates desh... a tax that generally is paid by the higher income families.

Funny how you never have to 'prove what you claim', yet you want others to spell things out for you in great detail.

Tell us Desh, what specific economic data from 1982-2000 do you want to discuss?

GDP growth?
Unemployment rate?
Labor participation rate?
Inflation?

What Desh? Show us your vast knowledge of economics. Where would you like to begin?
 
How many times did reagan raise taxes during this time you claim was an example of tax cuts and deregulation anyway?
 
Back
Top