Bannon to defy subpoena from January 6 committee, citing Trump's 'direction'

[Guno צְבִי]

The claim that Bannon could be covered by the former President's privilege is unusual because Bannon was not working for the federal government during the period surrounding the January 6 insurrection.

Privilege claims normally apply to close officials around the president and deliberations between government employees, and Bannon was fired from his role as a White House adviser in 2017.

Many legal experts say Bannon, as a private citizen, would have no standing to block a subpoena by claiming executive privilege.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...committee-citing-trump-s-direction/ar-AAPhiQU

 

[Terri4Trump]

Are you going to cry now you faggot antisemite little Nazi bitch?

 

[Nordberg]

The claim that Bannon could be covered by the former President's privilege is unusual because Bannon was not working for the federal government during the period surrounding the January 6 insurrection.

Privilege claims normally apply to close officials around the president and deliberations between government employees, and Bannon was fired from his role as a White House adviser in 2017.

Many legal experts say Bannon, as a private citizen, would have no standing to block a subpoena by claiming executive privilege.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...committee-citing-trump-s-direction/ar-AAPhiQU

Bannon is also not a lawyer. He has no privilege claim.