Bank fat cat is incensed by criticism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
fatcat-banker.jpg




When Loren Snyder's debit card was damaged recently, Bank of America wanted $5 to issue a new one.


That struck Snyder, a bank customer for many years, as penny-wise and pound-foolish.


"I know the CEO has to have his summer cottage and his yacht," the 63-year-old said. "But would it hurt them to give me a new card?"


Asked how he felt about the prospect of paying B of A $5 a month to use his own money after paying another $5 for the card to do it with, Snyder, who owns a dental supply business, said, "Can I use profanity?"


Brian T. Moynihan doesn't like that kind of talk.


CEO Moynihan said he is “incensed” by the public criticism of his company.


He used the strong word — it's from the Latin for fire and means "very angry" — speaking to bank employees at the bank's Charlotte, N.C., headquarters, saying he gets "a little incensed when you think about how much good all of you do, whether it's volunteer hours, charitable giving we do, serving clients and customers well."


He went on to say to the bank's critics, "You ought to think a little about that before you start yelling at us."


If you think a little about that, you'll quickly see it's completely irrelevant. All those charitable, volunteering employees have nothing to do with what people are yelling about.


If banking had an Academy Award for disingenuousness, Moynihan would be the industry's Meryl Streep.


Yes, Bank of America branches have employees who are really nice people.


But the analysts, regulators, investors, customers and others who are "yelling" at the bank aren't yelling at its employees, they're yelling about the bank's behavior.


Does Moynihan think people didn't notice that the second-largest American non-oil company (after only Walmart) took $45 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program bailout money and then announced they would charge people $5 a month to use their debit cards to access their own money?


Does Moynihan think people don't remember the bank's $50 billion "deal from hell" to buy bankruptcy-bound Merrill Lynch, and the $3.6 billion it handed out in bonuses to Merrill Lynch executives even as Merrill was reporting a loss of $27 billion for the year, and B of A was seeking more TARP money?


Maybe people didn't notice that when two of B of A's top executives, both reporting to Moynihan, were shown the door last month, their severance pay was more than $11 million.


In a J.D. Power and Associates customer satisfaction survey this month, B of A came in 24th out of 24 banks.


Consumerist.com named the bank the nation's second-worst American company of any kind.


B of A missed the gold only because of the presence of Darth Vader-ish BP on the list.


But since the "it's-not-our-fault" oil spillers are a British company, B of A could probably claim the all-American double: last in customer satisfaction and first as worst American company.


Maybe some of the people yelling want to know why, if Moynihan gets so incensed on behalf of the bank's charitable employees, he is planning to cut 30,000 of them from the payroll, as the bank announced last month.


Maybe they notice that B of A is facing skepticism from the market, anger from investors, lawsuits from its role in the mortgage debacle and a government investigation into its foreclosure practices, which have included such quirks as trying to foreclose on the wrong home.


Or that the bank has been selling off assets.


Or that its common stock has been dipping under $7 in recent days, about half its 52-week high.


Or that it's being sued by the Feds for allegedly misrepresenting the quality of mortgages it sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


Some have even noticed that the bank claims a book value (assets minus liabilities) of more than $200 billion, although the market doesn't agree, and its actual market cap is only about $72 billion.


If I were a customer, a shareholder, or an employee — even a charitable, volunteering one — I'd be incensed.



http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111030/NEWS/110300327

[URL]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66979.html#ixzz1cFy9baSN[/URL]
 
How dare any of the 99% criticize the 1%...they're the lordly 'job creators', and must be subsidized, bailed out, and protected by right wing conservatives at all costs...



cartoon080209_128541a.jpg
 
How dare any of the 99% criticize the 1%...they're the lordly 'job creators', and must be subsidized, bailed out, and protected by right wing conservatives at all costs...

We never should have bailed them out. They failed, and they should have gone bankrupt. Subsidizing their was just a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich.
 
We never should have bailed them out. They failed, and they should have gone bankrupt. Subsidizing their was just a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich.

Remind me...which Administration concocted TARP?
 
Funny how the JPP righties seem ashamed of the GOPs history of subsidizing the failures of the 'job creators' with the savings and net worth of the 99%...remember the savings and loan bailout?

Remind me...which administration was that?
 
Funny how the JPP righties seem ashamed of the GOPs history of subsidizing the failures of the 'job creators' with the savings and net worth of the 99%...remember the savings and loan bailout?

Remind me...which administration was that?

Do you somehow have the impression that I wish to defend Republicans? They're just as much traitors to the constitution and American people as the Democrats. I don't play the Team Red v. Team Blue game.
 
How did Republicans get their reputation for being stingy? Seems to me they're very generous with the American peoples money...as long as they are taking from the 99% and giving it to the rich...
 
Do you somehow have the impression that I wish to defend Republicans? They're just as much traitors to the constitution and American people as the Democrats. I don't play the Team Red v. Team Blue game.

Nope. I am opposed to conservatism, Tea-rorism, and rightwing hypocrisy. Those behaviors just happen to describe the GOP.
 
How did Republicans get their reputation for being stingy? Seems to me they're very generous with the American peoples money...as long as they are taking from the 99% and giving it to the rich...

In complete disregard to their oath to uphold the constitution, I might add.
 
Our financial industry has grown so large and rich it has corrupted our real institutions through political donations.


As Senator Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, bluntly said in a 2009 radio interview, despite having caused this crisis, these same financial firms “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they, frankly, own the place.”


Our Congress today is a forum for legalized bribery.


One consumer group using information from Opensecrets.org calculates that the financial services industry, including real estate, spent $2.3 billion on federal campaign contributions from 1990 to 2010, which was more than the health care, energy, defense, agriculture and transportation industries combined.


Why are there 61 members on the House Committee on Financial Services? So many congressmen want to be in a position to sell votes to Wall Street.


We can’t afford this any longer.


We need to focus on four reforms that don’t require new bureaucracies to implement.

1) If a bank is too big to fail, it is too big and needs to be broken up. We can’t risk another trillion-dollar bailout.
2) If your bank’s deposits are federally insured by U.S. taxpayers, you can’t do any proprietary trading with those deposits — period.
3) Derivatives have to be traded on transparent exchanges where we can see if another A.I.G. is building up enormous risk.
4) Finally, an idea from the blogosphere: U.S. congressmen should have to dress like Nascar drivers and wear the logos of all the banks, investment banks, insurance companies and real estate firms that they’re taking money from. The public needs to know.


Capitalism and free markets are the best engines for generating growth and relieving poverty — provided they are balanced with meaningful transparency, regulation and oversight.


We lost that balance in the last decade.


If we don’t get it back — and there is now a tidal wave of money resisting that — we will have another crisis.


And, if that happens, the cry for justice could turn ugly.


Free advice to the financial services industry: Stick to being bulls. Stop being pigs.





http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/30/o...-you-hear-the-one-about-the-bankers.html?_r=1
 
Back
Top