Baltimore officer acquitted of all charges in Freddie Gray case

anatta

100% recycled karma
A judge on Thursday found the sole officer charged with murder in the death of Freddie Gray in police custody not guilty of all charges, leaving prosecutors without a conviction for the third time in the high-profile case that engulfed the city in riots and unrest.

The verdict announced Thursday in the trial of Caesar Goodson Jr. is the second acquittal handed down by Judge Barry G. Williams in the case. The judge last month acquitted the second officer who went to trial in Gray’s death. The first officer’s trial ended in a hung jury.

Goodson, 46, drove the van that transported Gray through West Baltimore the morning of April 12, 2015, when the 25-year-old was arrested. Gray suffered a severe neck injury in the back of the van and died a week later.

[Timeline and charges in the case]

Gray’s death triggered demonstrations and looting in the city as the nation was already mired in a fevered debate over fatal police encounters involving young black men. The mayor imposed a citywide curfew and the governor called in the National Guard amid the riots.

Ahead of the verdict, a small group of protesters gathered outside the courthouse, holding signs demanding justice for Gray.

A few led chants: “All night, all day, we’re going to fight for Freddie Gray,” and “Indict, convict, send these killer cops to jail. The whole damn system is guilty as hell.”
Goodson faced the most serious charge of the six officers charged in the case.

With more than 30 witnesses testifying over an eight-day trial, prosecutors attempted to convince Williams that Goodson was culpable for Gray's death. As the van driver, prosecutors argued, Goodson had ultimate custody and care for Gray but failed to both buckle Gray into the back of the wagon and get him immediate medical attention. They contended Gray got a “rough ride,” bouncing around the back of the wagon without a seat belt but with his wrists and legs shackled.

“Officer Goodson, as the driver of the wagon in which Freddie Gray was confined, neither ensured his safety nor his well-being,” Deputy State’s Attorney Janice Bledsoe said in closing arguments.

[Baltimore prosecutors say Freddie Gray was given ‘rough ride’ in police van]

Goodson's attorneys countered that the officer’s decision not to enter the narrow van compartment and put a seat belt on Gray was reasonable because Gray was combative during his arrest. Gray didn’t say he was in pain or show signs of a medical emergency, they said. Prosecutors did not have evidence of a “rough ride” or witnesses who saw him driving erratically, Goodson’s attorneys said.


The mere fact that harm resulted does not mean that Officer Goodson’s conduct was the cause of that harm,” the officer’s attorney Matthew Fraling said.

As he announced the verdict, Williams said the state presented no evidence that Goodson gave Gray a “rough ride,” calling it “an inflammatory term of art” that was “not to be taken lightly.” He also said that prosecutors failed to show that Goodson should be held criminally culpable for failing to get Gray medical attention when he asked for it.

“No evidence have proven that the defendant knew or should have known of the acute medical distress Mr. Gray was in at that time,” Williams said.

The judge said it was impossible to tell at which point during the ride to jail Gray suffered his fatal neck injury. Prosecutors argued it happened near the end of the trip, when Goodson took a sharp right turn while running a stop sign. But the judge said he reviewed surveillance footage from the turn more than a dozen times and was unable to draw the same conclusion.

Williams also noted that multiple witnesses for the prosecution couldn’t define specifically what a rough ride was. Only when pressed, Williams said, did prosecutors in closing arguments say a rough ride could be inferred from Gray’s injuries and the fact that officers didn’t buckle him into the van.

Even before the case went to Williams for a verdict, the judge appeared skeptical of the second-degree depraved-heart murder charge. To win that conviction, prosecutors had to prove that Goodson’s actions or lack of actions created a very high risk to Gray’s life and that despite knowing the risks, Goodson acted “with extreme disregard of the life-endangering consequences.”

When the judge considered a motion for a judgement of acquittal before the defense launched its case, he told prosecutors that moving forward with the murder charge was a “close call” even when looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the state. When considering the verdict, the burden of proof required for a guilty finding — beyond a reasonable doubt — was much higher.

While much of the witness and expert testimony in Goodson's case mirrored the trial of William Porter, the first officer who went to court, there were also unique moments of drama and legal sparring.

For months, Goodson's trial was delayed as prosecutors and the defense fought over whether Porter could be forced to testify against his colleague despite awaiting retrial in September. The state's highest court eventually ruled that Porter must testify since prosecutors have promised not to use his testimony against him at his retrial.

When taking the witness stand in Goodson's trial for two hours, Porter testified that Gray did not exhibit signs of “immediate medical distress” the day of his April 2015 arrest. But Porter said he told Goodson that Gray should have been taken to a hospital anyway because he wouldn't be admitted at central booking.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...p-top-table-main_gray-11am-top:homepage/story
 
the general consensus from my (white) friends back in Balto. is that the prosecutor was a greenhorn and way over-charged.

second-degree depraved-heart murder charge. To win that conviction, prosecutors had to prove that Goodson’s actions or lack of actions created a very high risk to Gray’s life and that despite knowing the risks, Goodson acted “with extreme disregard of the life-endangering consequences.”
 
Wasn't this moron prosecutor out celebrating in the streets with the rioters? She also said no justice no peace.

She's a pos. Good for the jury and judge not to be intimidated by the mob.
 
Wasn't this moron prosecutor out celebrating in the streets with the rioters? She also said no justice no peace.

She's a pos. Good for the jury and judge not to be intimidated by the mob.

why would they feel intimidated by something that happened over a year ago?
 
Wasn't this moron prosecutor out celebrating in the streets with the rioters? She also said no justice no peace.
She's a pos. Good for the jury and judge not to be intimidated by the mob.
she's a young prosecutor.
 
why would they feel intimidated by something that happened over a year ago?

Did the rioters leave? They are still there threatening the courtroom if they dare let these "pigs" go free.

In fact some of the largest riots in US history happened After the acquittal of officers.
 
Did the rioters leave? They are still there threatening the courtroom if they dare let these "pigs" go free.

In fact some of the largest riots in US history happened After the acquittal of officers.

Rodney King rings a bell.
 
the prosecutor should have gone for nothing more then manslaughter

lol. I dont think he had a choice. What will happen when the black community hears that the murder was charged with a lesser crime? Do you think they will listen to his legal arguments or call him a rayciss?

I see this as BLM and the liberal media overcharging the issue and shooting themselves in the foot :)

The people should definetly go ahead and do another riot though :3
 
Wasn't this moron prosecutor out celebrating in the streets with the rioters? She also said no justice no peace.

She's a pos. Good for the jury and judge not to be intimidated by the mob.

There was no jury. The cops were smart and all requested bench trials.
 
Good, judicial process at work.

Something that was part of the judicial process wasn't acceptable to all the rioters in Ferguson with the Michael Brown case. We both know how those disagreeing reacted.

Do you remember when white people rioted after OJ was acquitted? Me, neither. I do remember plenty of blacks rioting when LA police officers were acquitted in the Rodney King case. See the difference? Probably not.
 
The legislature should pass a bill of attainder sentencing the officer in question to death, to be carried out immediately by firing squad. The justice system can't be trusted in this instance.
 
Back
Top