USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
So you would refuse to take responsibility for a child that was born in your house!!
Why is that??
Arizona's Next Immigration Target: Children of Illegals
- Thread starter SmarterthanYou
- Start date
So you would refuse to take responsibility for a child that was born in your house!!
Why is that??
Honestly, I think it is possible to make an argument that the children of parents who ONLY cross the border ILLEGALLY in order to give birth are not citizens, as their allegiance is of such a short duration and is in such a limited way as to be meaningless. But any illegal that has remained here for any significant period of time owes considerable allegiance to our laws and has submitted to the jurisdiction of our laws.
The problem with that argument, as I see it, though, is that we have created a precedent by a long standing custom of considering those children citizens.
The only way that can or should be changed is with an amendment. Or you can justify it by just ignoring the Constitution and making up shit as you go, like the many other enemies of our Constitution.
The problem with that argument, as I see it, though, is that we have created a precedent by a long standing custom of considering those children citizens.
The only way that can or should be changed is with an amendment. Or you can justify it by just ignoring the Constitution and making up shit as you go, like the many other enemies of our Constitution.
I am not going to continue chasing a point of no seeming relevance. But one more...
No. Because I am not liable for it by it being simply born in my house. Nowhere has any such nonsense ever been the case in US or common law history.
I see no relevance in this to birthright citizenship. If you want to continue this line you need to show why it is relevant.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Yeah, that was worth it. /sarcasm
The question was not whether I would give aid to the mother or child but whether it indicates any liability on my part.
This was a completely and pointless exercise. I don't like to use the ignore for anyone, but I am starting to consider it with you since you have nothing to say that is of any value. But, I can't resist kicking your ass all over the board, so it would not last long anyway.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You really must have your keyboard checked; because you keep typing in "kk", when it's obvious you should have put in "ss".
So now birth responsibility is considered by "liability" on someones part.
I guess using "ignore" would be in your best interest, seeing as how you don't seem to have the ability to just not respond.
Have you always been this weak willed??
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Exactly. Historically we don't not have a further level of debate about whether or not our laws should actually be enforced. the relevancy of the anchor baby issue approaches nill as our enforcement of immigration law approaches infinity.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Fortress America 2012 or Bust!