Anti-Clinton Hypocrisy.

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Hypocrisy!

Dangerous Don has a huge history of documented affairs including a child while married to another woman.

To cover this up, he fools his voters by attacking HRC because she didn't divorce her husband when he had an affair.... And you fools are falling for it!

So, lets get this straight.... You guys are voting for Dangerous Don, the serial adulterer over HRC because she didn't leave her husband when he had an affair? Very consistent of you! Love those anti women values.



Now watch as they ignore this or try desperately to change the subject!
 
Give it up, Counselor. They don't care about their Don's hypocrisy. They don't care about their Don's lies.

He is the...

hqdefault.jpg
 
If a man has affairs, that's ok.

If a woman does not divorce a man who has affairs, not ok.


Double standard much?
 
If a man has affairs, that's ok.

If a woman does not divorce a man who has affairs, not ok.

Double standard much?

If I were Hillary I wouldn't go there. There's a whole generation of young women voters who were mere rug rats when Hillary was doing her best Tammy Wynette imitation in 'standing by her man' lol, when in reality she was managing the 'bimbo eruptions' from the WH.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0WiQRBN8igE

Those of us old enough to remember, recall the hypocrisy of the feminists standing by the Clintons as well. All of that laundry will be aired if Hillary decides to go down that road.

Donald Trump isn't Mittens Romney.
 
HRC says she is the champion of women, that she will fight for them. But when women came forward to get some justice for Bubba's abuse of them where was she ?

I don't care whether she divorced him or not but it hardly projects the sort of fighter she would have you believe.

I'm not aware of Trump claiming such a mantle and it seems he did find himself single for his indescretions.

There is hypocrisy but it rests in the Clinton camp.
 
HRC says she is the champion of women, that she will fight for them. But when women came forward to get some justice for Bubba's abuse of them where was she ?

I don't care whether she divorced him or not but it hardly projects the sort of fighter she would have you believe.

I'm not aware of Trump claiming such a mantle and it seems he did find himself single for his indescretions.

There is hypocrisy but it rests in the Clinton camp.

The Hypocrisy is attacking HRC because her husband had an affair, while supporting a man who cheated on wife #1, had a baby with another woman while married to #1, cheated on #2, then married #3.
 
If I were Hillary I wouldn't go there. There's a whole generation of young women voters who were mere rug rats when Hillary was doing her best Tammy Wynette imitation in 'standing by her man' lol, when in reality she was managing the 'bimbo eruptions' from the WH.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0WiQRBN8igE

Those of us old enough to remember, recall the hypocrisy of the feminists standing by the Clintons as well. All of that laundry will be aired if Hillary decides to go down that road.

Donald Trump isn't Mittens Romney.

A true feminist would stand by a woman's right to chose to divorce her adulterous husband OR to keep her family together. Don't blame the victim!

Trump has made a career out of blaming victims.
 
Consigliere, nothing you say will stick. His soldiers are loyal to their Capo di tutt'i capi, the Teflon Don.

Your arguments sleep with the fishes.

hqdefault.jpg
 
The Hypocrisy is attacking HRC because her husband had an affair, while supporting a man who cheated on wife #1, had a baby with another woman while married to #1, cheated on #2, then married #3.

I realize you would like it to be so. Doesn't make it so.
 
HRC says she is the champion of women, that she will fight for them. But when women came forward to get some justice for Bubba's abuse of them where was she ?

I don't care whether she divorced him or not but it hardly projects the sort of fighter she would have you believe.

I'm not aware of Trump claiming such a mantle and it seems he did find himself single for his indescretions.

There is hypocrisy but it rests in the Clinton camp.

I have to think you posted this just to get a reaction. During the Clinton impeachment it was found that there was consensual contact with a lot of those women, not abuse. The focus was on infidelity but now cons are trying to rewrite history.

Did you support McCain back in 2008... when his marital cheating was aired and the first wife defended him anyway? How about when Gingrich's first wife defended him, did you smear her character for doing so?
 
I think that informing American women they're not good feminists if they don't kiss the ass of a woman who fucked their husband is a great message to run on. Going by Trump's polling among women I can see it's working already. Stick with it.
 
American political circus....why does anyone care about Hillary's bimbos(sic) or Trump;s lovechild?
"What difference does it make at this point?"
 
Hypocrisy!

Dangerous Don has a huge history of documented affairs including a child while married to another woman.

To cover this up, he fools his voters by attacking HRC because she didn't divorce her husband when he had an affair.... And you fools are falling for it!

So, lets get this straight.... You guys are voting for Dangerous Don, the serial adulterer over HRC because she didn't leave her husband when he had an affair? Very consistent of you! Love those anti women values.



Now watch as they ignore this or try desperately to change the subject!

I don't see how this type strategy by you and your people is going to help your Hillary because everybody knows Hillary looked the other way while Bill screwed around then covered for him when the allegations started.

Sorry, this is a loser .. failed.
 
Back
Top