Another PHONY RightWng "scandal" Goes Poof!

zappasguitar

Well-known member
BWAAAA H HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Expect much lamentation from the usual butthurt Righties!


FBI: We Do Not Expect To Find Any Criminal Wrongdoing On Hillary Clinton’s Part


CNN recently broke the news that according to investigators working with the FBI regarding Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

The story, published this weekend, has been buried as more information emerges regarding the horrific terrorist attack in Orlando that left 50 people dead and 53 injured.

The revelations from the FBI come as investigators begin poring through her emails regarding a classified drone campaign, which was eventually scrapped. Before it was scrapped, however, several media outlets (including the Washington Post) obtained information and circulated. Such information subsequently then ended up on Clinton’s private email server. According to CNN:

The CIA drone program is covert and considered classified, so while it is widely discussed in public and in media reports, any discussion of the program on a non-classified system is a violation of government rules. For this reason, the CIA insisted that the emails on the subject be retroactively classified.
Discussion of classified matters on government non-classified email systems is a perennial problem that occurs widely in the government, but damage is typically contained because violators use government email systems. What is not common is a cabinet-level official using a personal server to conduct all official business, outside the protection of government email servers.

So, as reported by the Inspector General, Clinton may have caused a bureaucratic headache, but has not broken any laws.

So sorry, Republicans (and Susan Sarandon), it looks as though there won’t be any indictment. And it’s not because President Obama endorsed her. It’s not because of a “rigged” system. It’s not because of the liberal media. It’s because she broke no laws.

And we all know Republicans hate the truth, so only time will tell until they start to turn their backs on the FBI and denounce them as traitors to America.

http://addictinginfo.org/2016/06/13...criminal-wrongdoing-on-hillary-clintons-part/
 
gosh, she can't even wait until the FBI talks before she gets her pet media to tell us what the FBI will say.......when Obama tried to tell us what the FBI was going to say it didn't quite work out the way she wanted......no reason to expect this is any different.....
 
gosh, she can't even wait until the FBI talks before she gets her pet media to tell us what the FBI will say.......when Obama tried to tell us what the FBI was going to say it didn't quite work out the way she wanted......no reason to expect this is any different.....

Pray for it Pastor.
 
Really, when the Bush/Cheney emails went missing from the RNC server, did you hear screaming about conspiracy or corruption?

Maybe a lone cry or two, but nothing whatsoever like this!
 
The CIA drone program is covert and considered classified, so while it is widely discussed in public and in media reports, any discussion of the program on a non-classified system is a violation of government rules. For this reason, the CIA insisted that the emails on the subject be retroactively classified.
Discussion of classified matters on government non-classified email systems is a perennial problem that occurs widely in the government, but damage is typically contained because violators use government email systems. What is not common is a cabinet-level official using a personal server to conduct all official business, outside the protection of government email servers
expected. rule breaking and putting security at risk doesn't always rise to classification law breaking.
Clinton could have classified any of this herself ( sec of state),or took it to the "high side"-but she chose to use her private server exclusively.

But to actually indict - each violation has to be weighed up against statutory law.
So you have a rogue communications system and a lieing Clinton's defense in the press, but it doesn't make it actually criminal.
The Dem's standard for ethical politics is "catch me if you can" - instead of ethical behavior.

In truth though the public doesn't demand anything from Clinton, having been already anointed in the press.
So this corruption skates into the WH. "People get the kind of government they deserve"
 
Once again the investigation is not over and Zappas is declaring this as fact.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk

Once again we discover, with Seasick, it's not about the truth, it's about being a douchebag.

The article in the OP CLEARLY states the investigation IS NOT YET OVER, that they have found NO EVIDENCE of wrongdoing, and that they DO NOT EXPECT to file any criminal charges against Hillary.

BUT that no final determination has yet been made.
 
Once again we discover, with Seasick, it's not about the truth, it's about being a douchebag.

The article in the OP CLEARLY states the investigation IS NOT YET OVER, that they have found NO EVIDENCE of wrongdoing, and that they DO NOT EXPECT to file any criminal charges against Hillary.

BUT that no final determination has yet been made.
So why does your title state it is a phony scandal? You just admitted the investigation is ongoing, thus how can you claim it is phony?

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top