Another climate warming lie exposed.

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
Remember when the headlines said this?

Polar bears could disappear by 2100 due to melting ice, climate change, study says
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/...-2100-due-melting-ice-climate-change-n1234439

Then of course, the FAKE media takes that line and copies it.

Polar Bears Could Face Extinction By 2100 Due To Climate Change, Study Says
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisett...to-climate-change-study-says/?sh=7ba1a7152276

Climate change on track to wipe out polar bears by end of century, study warns
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/climate-change-polar-bears-extinct-by-2100/

Its ALL a big fat lie people!
 
The Myth That the Polar Bear Population Is Declining
The story of a resurgent polar bear population deserves to be told and applauded.
Monday, September 9, 2019

Many of us watched the viral video in horror. A starving polar bear scavenging for food on barren land, his ribs visible beneath a jaundiced white coat.

“This is what climate change looks like,” said National Geographic.

The magazine explained that because of melting sea ice, precipitated by climate change, more of these mammals are starving. They pointed to a new study in Science suggesting that polar bears require much greater caloric intake in their diet than previously believed.

The video, shot by photographers Paul Nicklen and Cristina Mittermeier on Somerset Island, sparked outcry over the decimation of polar bears due to global warming.

The footage was viewed by 2.5 billion people, National Geographic estimated. The video remains the most viewed on National Geographic’s website—ever.

What Followed

While many remember the footage of the polar bear, fewer are aware of what followed.

As Michele Moses recently explained in The New Yorker, scientists accused National Geographic of “being loose with the facts.” There was no evidence, many pointed out, that the bear’s condition was the result of climate change. The bear simply could have been old, ill, or suffering from a degenerative disease.

Mittermeier admitted as much a year later.

“I can’t say that this bear was starving because of climate change,” she wrote in National Geographic.

Perhaps we made a mistake in not telling the full story—that we were looking for a picture that foretold the future and that we didn’t know what had happened to this particular polar bear.

What the Numbers Say

While you’ll find no shortage of headlines declaring that polar bears face extinction, the numbers tell a different story.

In fact, though polar bears were placed under the protection of the Endangered Species Act in 2008 over concerns that its Arctic hunting grounds were being reduced by a warming climate, the polar bear population has been stable for the last three decades.

In 1984, the polar bear population was estimated at 25,000. In 2008, when polar bears were designated a protected species, The New York Times noted that number remained unchanged: “There are more than 25,000 bears in the Arctic, 15,500 of which roam within Canada’s territory.”

New estimates from the International Union for Conservation of Nature show a mid-point estimate of 26,500 (range: 22,000 to 31,000) in 2015. In The State of the Polar Report 2018, zoologist Susan J. Crockford says updates to IUCN data put the new global mid-point estimate at more than 30,000.

Even accepting the lower figure, the estimate is the highest since the polar bear became internationally protected in 1973.


https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-polar-bear-population-is-declining/
 
It's time for the sheeple to realize they are being severely gaslighted by the media, special interests and power-hungry Government apparatchiks that use these false claims as ways to grab for more power.

The media have proven time and again that they are liars more interested in promoting false narratives that only serve Governments interests than we, the sheeple.
 
Back
Top