All I can do is offer the explanation I just posted, maybe you'll get it if you hear it from a conservative
A conservative explanation of the gravity of Don Jr's blunder
"Conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer blasted Republicans defending President Trump's eldest son on Tuesday"
"Look, this is incompetence, they got swindled and he admits 'If I had known, I wouldn't have done this,'" Krauthammer added. "But to say 'I love it,' to be informed that the Russians are working on their behalf, contradicts six months of stories."
"Krauthammer indicated that newly revealed correspondence showing Trump Jr. setting up a meeting with a Russian lawyer changed his view of Trump's team amid probes into possible ties between his campaign and Russia."
"I defended them, because up until today there was no 'there' there," he said"
"Well now there is a 'there.'"
"The denial of collusion is very weak right now because it looks as if Don Jr. was receptive to receiving this information," he concluded."
“This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump,” Goldstone wrote."
“If it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer," Trump Jr. replied"
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...e-for-trump-jr