ALVIN BRAGG ISN'T A DEMOCRAT, HE'S A REPUBLICAN - A "BANANA REPUBLICAN."

Dachshund

Verified User
On his first day in Office, Alvin Bragg - the Soros - backed, New York, Democrat, District Attorney (DA) began by announcing all the crimes that he would NOT prosecute. The person elected as New York's top, law - enforcement official has a long list of laws he didn't respect enough to follow. Here are just some of the crimes that DA Bragg's office won't prosecute even though they remain criminal offences in the state of New York....



* Possessing marijuana

* Refusing to pay the fare for public transportation

* Trespassing

* Failing to pay fines for unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle

* Committing any traffic infraction

* Resisting arrest

* Obstructing a governmental administration

* Engaging in prostitution

* Most other misdemeanour offences



Yes, that's right, "Fat Alvin" substituted his politics for the rule of law because that's what so-called, reformist, progressive, prosecutors do; and there was not the faintest squeak of dissent to be heard anywhere, or from anyone, on the left. Felonies would be downgraded, serious cases dismissed or pled down and prison terms would rarely be served.




What made Alvin feel he was justified in showing this kind of flagrant disrespect for the law? Well, the reason was that "Fat Alvin"" knows that he is an exceptional genius; and his field of expertise is "Social Engineering". This means that Alvin has a near-luminous insight into the profound complexities human nature, and thus the way that human societies like America function. Given this he know exactly what must be done in order to advance the progress American society ever further towards its ideal state. This state is a future paradise on Earth called "Utopia." In his role as a progressive Democrat and enlightened "Social Engineer" (NB: for over 100 years now, "Progressive" American Democrats have been "Social Engineers.") - Alvin is boldly following in footsteps of political giants, including :such "great spirits"as: Chairman Mao Zedong and the brilliant, Pol Pot. Special mention is also in order for that visionary and revolutionary/ progressive, Venezuelan leader, Nicolas Maduro (a personal friend of our own beloved Commander- in -Chief, President"Blow-Hole" Joe Biden, who is without doubt one of greatest leaders and statesmen in the history of the American republic.:clap::clap:



Returning now on a more sober note to the subject of this OP; it is Indeed an astonishing thing, friends, that DA Bragg has discerned the one crime that is worth the full weight of his office. Forget about guns, homicide, rape, robbery and acts of violence. What really captured DA Bragg's attention was the issue of "Hush Money - that is, the payment of money to a person or persons to ensure they will be quiet, in this case, about about a sexual "fling." What totally blew DA Bragg's tiny mind, was his conclusion that "Hush Money" had been paid by his sworn enemy, former President Trump, in respect of his philanderings with two "Scarlet Women, both notorious American "Jezebels." One payment of some $130,000 (USD) was given to a porn actress - ( a "boobilicious", bottle - blonde who had made her name in the industry as a talented, "anal acrobat") - her name is Stormy "Horse-Face" Daniels. Ms Daniels has claimed she had sex with President Trump in a luxury apartment complex one evening in 2006, after being introduced to him on a nearby golf course a few days earlier..DA Bragg alleges that "hush money" was also paid to another woman who was engaged in a separate sexual relationship with Donald Trump that same year.. This woman was the former, "Playboy Magazine" model and Playmate of the Year", one, Karen McDougal. The former Heffner Bunny has recent confirmed that she and Donald Trump were embroiled in an intimate affaire d'Coeur for 10 months after they first met in 2006.



It is a curious thing that, DA Bragg, has spend years "wetting his panties" about these two sexual intrigues involving President Trump, both of which took place that took place some 17 years ago. "Alvin" is particularly concerned about the hush money" that was paid to Ms Daniels in 2016 ( to seal a a Non-Disclosure Agreement - NDA) during Donald Trump's campaign as Republican Party's Presidential nominee for the election that was held in November of that year.. In his recent indictment of Donald Trump, DA Bragg presented an outlandish, extremely weak and dubious criminal case against Trump, that no other Federal or state prosecutor had or would ever have dreamed of pressing. Bragg's case is grounded on the "hush money" payment to Stormy Daniels, but is is not a crime to pay money for an NDA. As well as this the Statuto of imitation had expired on Bragg's case and there were a host of other legal problems with his indiction including major violations of legal due process.


THIS OP WILL BE COMPLETED SHORTLY. RIGHT NOW IT IS TIME FOR MY AFTERNOON NAP !
 
Last edited:
Not a shred of documented, legal proof from this mental diarrhea by our UK neo-nazi dog. Just a regurgitation of the blather echoed in the Murdoch media empire.

Murdoch copped under threat of legal perjury in a court of law (under oath) that he KNEW that his Fox organization in America was pushing a BIG LIE for Trump.

Got that? Also, in the Dominion lawsuit it's revealed that all the talking heads of Fox News KNEW that it was a Big Lie.

So with all these exposed and confessed liars, why should we believe anything they say or theorize? And why are goose steppers like the OP author here so willing to play the sap for the aforementioned?

Once again, fascists & bigots trade in lies to make their disgusting mindset seem plausible. I almost have pity for them.
 
Not a shred of documented, legal proof from this mental diarrhea by our UK neo-nazi dog. Just a regurgitation of the blather echoed in the Murdoch media empire.

Murdoch copped under threat of legal perjury in a court of law (under oath) that he KNEW that his Fox organization in America was pushing a BIG LIE for Trump.

Got that? Also, in the Dominion lawsuit it's revealed that all the talking heads of Fox News KNEW that it was a Big Lie.

So with all these exposed and confessed liars, why should we believe anything they say or theorize? And why are goose steppers like the OP author here so willing to play the sap for the aforementioned?

Once again, fascists & bigots trade in lies to make their disgusting mindset seem plausible. I almost have pity for them.

Dachshund is an Aussie, imbecile!!
 
attachment.php
 
Here comes the judge:


Judge Overseeing Trump’s Case in Manhattan Could Face Ethics Complaint
Photo of Jon Dougherty Jon DoughertyApril 7, 2023
Creative Commons

The New York judge overseeing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against former President Donald Trump could himself face an ethics complaint and investigation for his own past actions.

Several legal experts and former prosecutors believe that Judge Juan Merchan may have violated New York’s Code of Judicial Conduct by making three donations to Democrats in 2020, adding that could be grounds for an ethics investigation, according to Breitbart News.

Per Section 100.5 of the New York Code of Judicial Conduct, sitting judges cannot “directly or indirectly engage in any political activity.” Among the prohibited political activity: “(h) soliciting funds for, paying an assessment to, or making a contribution to a political organization or candidate.”

The New York State Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics’s yearly-updated handbook points this out clearly: “A sitting judge may not make political contributions at any time, even to a U.S. presidential candidate or to a federal congressional candidate outside of New York State (Opinion 11-146; 22 NYCRR 100.5[A][1][h]).”

And, according to the American Bar Association’s Model Code of Judicial Conduct, a judge shall not, unless permitted by law, “solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution to a political organization or a candidate for public office.”

“However, Merchan — a New York state judge — made three political donations in 2020, according to public Federal Election Commission records,” Breitbart pointed out.

FEC records reveal that Merchan contributed $15.00 to Biden for President, Trump’s opponent, on July 26, 2020, through ActBlue. On the following day, July 27, 2020, he made a $10.00 donation to the Progressive Turnout Project, an organization focused on encouraging Democrat voters to turn out. Additionally, he donated $10.00 to Stop Republicans, which is part of the Progressive Turnout Project that aims to resist the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s “radical right-wing legacy,” also through ActBlue, Breitbart News reported.
 
$35.00!??!? That's what all this "belief" of what "may be" a rule violation is about?

Well, let these ANONYMOUS "legal experts and former prosecutors" make their case in court. Until then, ex-con Bannon's video rag is just making MAGA noise as usual.
 
$35.00!??!? That's what all this "belief" of what "may be" a rule violation is about?

Well, let these ANONYMOUS "legal experts and former prosecutors" make their case in court. Until then, ex-con Bannon's video rag is just making MAGA noise as usual.

The amount is unimportant, it's the intent. The judge should be recused at the very least.
 
Back
Top