Afghanistan will revert to being a terrorist haven after withdrawal, US report warns

cancel2 2022

Canceled
Afghanistan could become a future terrorist haven when the U.S. withdraws unless a larger and more expensive Afghan security force is planned, a study has warned. The report sketched a scenario in which the Taliban would seek to capitalize on the absence of foreign combat forces and press its campaign to regain political power in Kabul. 'History suggests that the Taliban will use sanctuaries in Pakistan to regenerate their capabilities as military pressure on the movement declines,' the report said.

As a first step, in 2015-16, the Taliban may put additional pressure on Afghan security forces in rural areas, expand their control and influence in areas vacated this year by coalition forces, encircle key cities and conduct high-profile attacks in urban areas, the report said. By 2016-18, after recovering from the military pounding it has taken in recent years from U.S. and coalition forces, the Taliban may be in position to press a more aggressive and intense military campaign. The report also says the U.S. will need to keep pressure on what remains of al-Qaida inside of Afghanistan in order to prevent it from becoming a significant future threat. It said small numbers of al-Qaida members are still active in the remote valleys of northeastern Afghanistan — an assessment shared by U.S. intelligence agencies.


 
Afghanistan could become a future terrorist haven when the U.S. withdraws unless a larger and more expensive Afghan security force is planned, a study has warned. The report sketched a scenario in which the Taliban would seek to capitalize on the absence of foreign combat forces and press its campaign to regain political power in Kabul. 'History suggests that the Taliban will use sanctuaries in Pakistan to regenerate their capabilities as military pressure on the movement declines,' the report said.

As a first step, in 2015-16, the Taliban may put additional pressure on Afghan security forces in rural areas, expand their control and influence in areas vacated this year by coalition forces, encircle key cities and conduct high-profile attacks in urban areas, the report said. By 2016-18, after recovering from the military pounding it has taken in recent years from U.S. and coalition forces, the Taliban may be in position to press a more aggressive and intense military campaign. The report also says the U.S. will need to keep pressure on what remains of al-Qaida inside of Afghanistan in order to prevent it from becoming a significant future threat. It said small numbers of al-Qaida members are still active in the remote valleys of northeastern Afghanistan — an assessment shared by U.S. intelligence agencies.

Shut up, Zionist. Nobody cares about your propaganda.
 
Tom, send your two boys to fight the Taliban. This country is bankrupted by our efforts there and we have sacrificed enough of our children, chicken hawk.
 
Yes. And I exposed your propagandistic machinations.

So you are saying that only Zionists are worried that Afghanistan will revert back to the Taliban controlled hellhole and become a haven for Islamic terrorists again? I thought that was pretty damned obvious irrespective of your political persuasions.
 
So you are saying that only Zionists are worried that Afghanistan will revert back to the Taliban controlled hellhole and become a haven for Islamic terrorists again? I thought that was pretty damned obvious irrespective of your political persuasions.

Yes. And think again, stymie.
 
Radicals or not, we love Afghanistan and will always embrace it as it is, no matter how it is.

-- The Left

If you believe there is a problem in Afghanistan or Pakistan, the smartest thing to do would be to disallow all travel of those people into their target areas, "the west". Problem solved. Oh wait, that would actually work, cheaply. That policy would not help the war machine at all.

Perpetual war for generations is the solution of a madman.
 
If you believe there is a problem in Afghanistan or Pakistan, the smartest thing to do would be to disallow all travel of those people into their target areas, "the west". Problem solved. Oh wait, that would actually work, cheaply. That policy would not help the war machine at all.

Perpetual war for generations is the solution of a madman.

That is just totally unworkable, do you know how many Pakistanis live in the UK? Just two miles from me is a large Pakistani area, should we put a fence around it?
 
Radicals or not, we love Afghanistan and will always embrace it as it is, no matter how it is.

-- The Left
Granule; In the thousands of years no one has conquered the Afgan mountains. That is why Bin Laden was able to hide there from our very best for the entire presidency of Dubya.

War there bankrupted the USSR, leaving the US as sole super power in the world.

We (the US) are now at the brink of bankruptcy due to our involvement there.

Is that what you want, that the US go the way of the USSR? I realize you are an uninformed moron, which is why I spelled this out for you.

So, Granule, what is it going to be; financial collapse of the US, or childish churlishness about the "liberals? Act your age, not your IQ, moron.
 
That is just totally unworkable, do you know how many Pakistanis live in the UK? Just two miles from me is a large Pakistani area, should we put a fence around it?

So do you propose war on the UK? of course, to you any solution but military force in the Mideast is unworkable.
 
That is just totally unworkable, do you know how many Pakistanis live in the UK? Just two miles from me is a large Pakistani area, should we put a fence around it?

Don't be an extremist thinker, Tom, and fight your own battles with your own children and treasure.
 
Back
Top