Additional exposure of Benghazi Scandal.

Raptor

Verified User
Additional exposure of Benghazi Scandal.

Judicial Watch: New Benghazi Email Shows DOD Offered State Department “Forces that Could Move to Benghazi” Immediately – Specifics Blacked Out in New Document

DECEMBER 08, 2015

“They are spinning up as we speak.” U.S. Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash Tuesday, September 11, 2012, 7:19 PM

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released a new Benghazi email from then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash to State Department leadership immediately offering “forces that could move to Benghazi” during the terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. In an email sent to top Department of State officials, at 7:19 p.m. ET, only hours after the attack had begun, Bash says, “we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak.” The Obama administration redacted the details of the military forces available, oddly citing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption that allows the withholding of “deliberative process” information.

Bash’s email seems to directly contradict testimony given by then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February 2013. Defending the Obama administration’s lack of military response to the nearly six-hour-long attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Panetta claimed that “time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response.”

The first assault occurred at the main compound at about 9:40 pm local time – 3:40 p.m. ET in Washington, DC. The second attack on a CIA annex 1.2 miles away began three hours later, at about 12 am local time the following morning – 6 p.m. ET.

The newly released email reads:

From: Bash, Jeremy CIV SD [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Sherman, Wendy R; Nides, Thomas R
Cc: Miller, James HON OSD POLICY; Wienefeld, James A ADM JSC VCJCS; Kelly, John LtGen SD; martin, dempsey [REDACTED]
Subject: Libya

State colleagues:

I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S [apparent reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton].

After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include a [REDACTED].

Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, we will ask State to procure the approval from host nation. Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us [REDACTED].

Jeremy

Jacob Sullivan was Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the time of the terrorist attack at Benghazi. Wendy Sherman was Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, the fourth-ranking official in the U.S. Department of State. Thomas Nides was the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

The timing of the Bash email is particularly significant based upon testimony given to members of Congress by Gregory Hicks, Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. embassy in Tripoli at the time of the Benghazi terrorist attack. According to Hicks’ 2013 testimony, a show of force by the U.S. military during the siege could have prevented much of the carnage. Said Hicks, “if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.”

Ultimately, Special Operations forces on their own initiative traveled from Tripoli to Benghazi to provide support during the attack. Other military assets were only used to recover the dead and wounded, and to evacuate U.S. personnel from Libya. In fact, other documents released in October by Judicial Watch show that only one U.S. plane was available to evacuate Americans from Benghazi to Tripoli and raise questions about whether a delay of military support led to additional deaths in Benghazi.

The new email came as a result of a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on September 4, 2014 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01511)), seeking:

Records related to notes, updates, or reports created in response to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. This request includes, but is not limited to, notes taken by then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton or employees of the Office of the Secretary of State during the attack and its immediate aftermath.
“The Obama administration and Clinton officials hid this compelling Benghazi email for years,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The email makes readily apparent that the military was prepared to launch immediate assistance that could have made a difference, at least at the CIA Annex. The fact that the Obama Administration withheld this email for so long only worsens the scandal of Benghazi.”
 
So the DOD was ready, willing and able to assist our assets in Benghazi and the State Dept. that approval DID NOT COME

THAT IS A STAND DOWN ORDER,,,,if it quacks likes a duck, its a duck.


Records related to notes, updates, or reports created in response to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. This request includes, but is not limited to, notes taken by then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton or employees of the Office of the Secretary of State during the attack and its immediate aftermath.
“The Obama administration and Clinton officials hid this compelling Benghazi email for years,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The email makes readily apparent that the military was prepared to launch immediate assistance that could have made a difference, at least at the CIA Annex. The fact that the Obama Administration withheld this email for so long only worsens the scandal of Benghazi.”
 
Another glimpse into HRC is her lying about not telling the family of the deceased it was about a video. The family says she did.
Snakes would not attempt that lie.
An amazingly enough, she has not been excised from the field campaigning.
 
Another glimpse into HRC is her lying about not telling the family of the deceased it was about a video. The family says she did.
Snakes would not attempt that lie.
An amazingly enough, she has not been excised from the field campaigning.

“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) said on WIBX First News with Keeler in the Morning, a radio show in upstate New York.
 
“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) said on WIBX First News with Keeler in the Morning, a radio show in upstate New York.

Given the parade of lies that got exposed of course it was. People not being honest in conjunction with the job the citizens paid them to do NEEDS to be pursued. It's oversight Congress is obligated to do.
What difference does it make ? A lot.
 
Given the parade of lies that got exposed of course it was. People not being honest in conjunction with the job the citizens paid them to do NEEDS to be pursued. It's oversight Congress is obligated to do.
What difference does it make ? A lot.

lol, you guys try to make a bigger deal of this than the other attacks on embassy, it is ridiculous.
 
“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.) said on WIBX First News with Keeler in the Morning, a radio show in upstate New York.

Yep; one guys OPINION is all RanaTARD needs to exonerate a partisan crook and liar like Hillary.

 
lol, you guys try to make a bigger deal of this than the other attacks on embassy, it is ridiculous.

Were those attacks lied about by the administration ?
Were they further lied about after the lie was discovered ?
This is not troubling to you ?
 
Were those attacks lied about by the administration ?
Were they further lied about after the lie was discovered ?
This is not troubling to you ?

No one questioned the administration on what they said about the attacks, the reason they focused on Hillary and Benghazi is due to their fear of her winning the election, they have confessed to this, why do you all refuse to believe them?
 
No one questioned the administration on what they said about the attacks, the reason they focused on Hillary and Benghazi is due to their fear of her winning the election, they have confessed to this, why do you all refuse to believe them?

Untrue. The administration was called on it as they lied the most about the video especially
 
Untrue. The administration was called on it as they lied the most about the video especially

Lol, you just don't get it, this huge ordeal over Benghazi has been exposed for what it is, they were never really interested in it beyond getting Hillary. The very simple way to protect our personnel in hostile countries is for us to simply not be there. Problem solved.
 
I am sure that when something like this happens, the Pentagon jumps into action and gets the best possible mission in place, even if it is very unlikely to work, then briefs the President on how unlikely it is to work. They stand at the ready incase the CIC decides to go against their advice and order it.

If the President ordered a doomed rescue mission and more were killed because of it, they would be attacking him for that. (See Jimmy Carter in his hostage rescue mission in Iran)

What this has to do with Hillary Clinton is beyond me.
 
Lol, you just don't get it, this huge ordeal over Benghazi has been exposed for what it is, they were never really interested in it beyond getting Hillary. The very simple way to protect our personnel in hostile countries is for us to simply not be there. Problem solved.

So the lies don't trouble you. Not even a little bit.
May want to revise the post in the grizzly welcome thread about walking in lockstep.
 
So the lies don't trouble you. Not even a little bit.
May want to revise the post in the grizzly welcome thread about walking in lockstep.

Politicians lie and it they do it sometimes in the interest of National Security, this lie that the terrorist attacks were the results of a video, an attack that happened with in days of other attacks that were about the video, were corrected when more information was garnered.

You know the lie that did affect me and continues to affect me because of the ongoing chaos in the region, that Saddam had a nuclear program and weapons of mass destruction and that we needed to invade Iraq.

So, forgive me for not getting worked up about Obama and Hillary misnaming, mischaracterizing the event in Benghazi at first and the failures of the State Department to protect our embassy personnel when Bush sent thousands of young soldiers to Iraq to be maimed and killed.
 
Politicians lie and it they do it sometimes in the interest of National Security, this lie that the terrorist attacks were the results of a video, an attack that happened with in days of other attacks that were about the video, were corrected when more information was garnered.

You know the lie that did affect me and continues to affect me because of the ongoing chaos in the region, that Saddam had a nuclear program and weapons of mass destruction and that we needed to invade Iraq.

So, forgive me for not getting worked up about Obama and Hillary misnaming, mischaracterizing the event in Benghazi at first and the failures of the State Department to protect our embassy personnel when Bush sent thousands of young soldiers to Iraq to be maimed and killed.

You know, it's funny.

With all the whining and all the hysterics about Hillary lying, nobody wants to discuss Rumsfeld's outlandish lie: "We know Saddam has WMD's. We know where they are."

Republican hysterics concerning Benghazi might be a bit believable if they had spent even a DAY freaking out over Rummy's bullshit.
 
lol, you guys try to make a bigger deal of this than the other attacks on embassy, it is ridiculous.

YEAH, tell it our people that it wasn't that big of a deal; but you want to lol about it

Does it look like he's laughing, you fucking disingenuous bitch?
Benghazi-torture.jpg


whatdifference-e1376969577252.jpg
 
Back
Top