Matthew Kacsmaryk, the Texas federal judge who took it upon himself to impose a national ban on the FDA approved abortion pill, turns out to have had his name removed from a law review article in preparation for his Presidential interview. In the article, the "unappointed jurist" made clear his opposition to "drugs designed to kill unborn children".
hhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/15/matthew-kacsmaryk-law-review/
"...a few months after the piece arrived, an editor at the law journal who had been working with Kacsmaryk received an unusual email: Citing “reasons I may discuss at a later date,” Kacsmaryk, who had originally been listed as the article’s sole author, said he would be removing his name and replacing it with those of two colleagues at his legal group, First Liberty Institute, according to emails and early drafts obtained by The Washington Post.
What Kacsmaryk did not say in the email was that he had already been interviewed for a judgeship by his state’s two senators and was awaiting an interview at the White House....'
hhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/15/matthew-kacsmaryk-law-review/
"...a few months after the piece arrived, an editor at the law journal who had been working with Kacsmaryk received an unusual email: Citing “reasons I may discuss at a later date,” Kacsmaryk, who had originally been listed as the article’s sole author, said he would be removing his name and replacing it with those of two colleagues at his legal group, First Liberty Institute, according to emails and early drafts obtained by The Washington Post.
What Kacsmaryk did not say in the email was that he had already been interviewed for a judgeship by his state’s two senators and was awaiting an interview at the White House....'