Ignored. You're obviously too stupid to understand that any mischaracterization of someone else's position is dishonest. I did explain fully why you did so.
Did I write "For example ..."? Wait, you don't know what that means, do you? You need me to teach you. Fine. How much do you think I'll need to dumb it down for you?
Why did you insert the word "basically"? You can't write "... and eliminates the need for a designer."
Dawkins himself doesn't believe there is a designer, but he does not claim that science proves this. You mischaracterize his position.
