Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 100

Thread: A challenge to the anti-gun crowd here. - part deux

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default A challenge to the anti-gun crowd here. - part deux

    On the original thread, Stone and I were having an exchange, regarding firearms, he made a comment, I challenged him, and apparently he's developed amnesia since then, seeing as how he's ran from his own assumptions.

    I therefore have decided to move the conversation to it's own thread, so it's easier for him to "find".

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Then explain which ones you FEEL need to be under greater control and please don't try to use the worn out argument concerning hunting?
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Any gun that fires faster than a standard handgun, or can hold more than ten rounds, should be illegal.
    There can be exceptions, of course. Maybe rural areas with dangerous animals can have less strict regulations.
    Do you FEEL that would be enough to defend yourself?
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Before we get into this to deep, what is your qualification for a "standard handgun"?

    How would banning magazines that hold more then 10 rounds make a difference, in you opinion?
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Guns like the Beretta M9.

    It would make killing lots of people on a shooting spree more difficult, but you'd still be able to defend yourself from home invaders.
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Don't tell me a make or model; but what the overall design of the hand gun essentially is;; because then we can move forward.

    By the way, the Beretta M9 has a 15 round Magazine Capacity.
    Stone doesn't see his error.

    Can anyone else see it??
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    On the original thread, Stone and I were having an exchange, regarding firearms, he made a comment, I challenged him, and apparently he's developed amnesia since then, seeing as how he's ran from his own assumptions.

    I therefore have decided to move the conversation to it's own thread, so it's easier for him to "find".







    Stone doesn't see his error.

    Can anyone else see it??
    Yes, the Beretta M9 model should be changed to only hold ten rounds. However, it fires at a standard speed.
    And there is no reason to get triggered, we're just talking.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    On the original thread, Stone and I were having an exchange, regarding firearms, he made a comment, I challenged him, and apparently he's developed amnesia since then, seeing as how he's ran from his own assumptions.

    I therefore have decided to move the conversation to it's own thread, so it's easier for him to "find".







    Stone doesn't see his error.

    Can anyone else see it??
    Sure, that is easy, he engaged in an exchange with a gun advocate who is never going to accept the fact that more guns doesn't make the US safer, nor has it ever made the US safer, common sense dictates the opposite seeing we got more guns out there and are still the leading developed nation in the world with gun deaths

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Yes, the Beretta M9 model should be changed to only hold ten rounds. However, it fires at a standard speed.
    And there is no reason to get triggered, we're just talking.
    But for some reason you didn't include this "disclaimer", when you suggested it.

    Why is that?

    Maybe you didn't realize that it held 15 rounds and just FELT that it sounded good!!

    But how would changing the size of the magazine, make it "safer'??
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Sure, that is easy, he engaged in an exchange with a gun advocate who is never going to accept the fact that more guns doesn't make the US safer, nor has it ever made the US safer, common sense dictates the opposite seeing we got more guns out there and are still the leading developed nation in the world with gun deaths
    Nope, you've failed; but thanks for giving it your best "shot".
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Nope, you've failed; but thanks for giving it your best "shot".
    Maybe, but the "common sense" comment is indisputable

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Maybe, but the "common sense" comment is indisputable
    Common sense says if you don't think people should own guns, you should get off your lazy ass and personally try to take them.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    But for some reason you didn't include this "disclaimer", when you suggested it.

    Why is that?

    Maybe you didn't realize that it held 15 rounds and just FELT that it sounded good!!

    But how would changing the size of the magazine, make it "safer'??
    You're being ridiculous now.

    Changing the size of the magazine would make it harder to kill more people on a shooting spree.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    JPF (04-14-2019)

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Maybe, but the "common sense" comment is indisputable
    But it is disputable; because it has not been shown that removing the availability of guns from law abiding citizens make them safer from the criminals.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    You're being ridiculous now.

    Changing the size of the magazine would make it harder to kill more people on a shooting spree.
    I have something to show you, that proves you to be in error; but I would rather see how you FEEL it would make it harder.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Common sense says if you don't think people should own guns, you should get off your lazy ass and personally try to take them.
    Now we got this one with his lame ass challenges, I'm not driving to Mississippi or whatever backward State you reside in to take away your toys, you kidding, considering the the possibilities of anyone getting shot by a gun go up astronomically by just having a gun present I hope you have all the toys your underdeveloped libido requires.

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Now we got this one with his lame ass challenges, I'm not driving to Mississippi or whatever backward State you reside in to take away your toys, you kidding, considering the the possibilities of anyone getting shot by a gun go up astronomically by just having a gun present I hope you have all the toys your underdeveloped libido requires.
    Which is bullshit; unless you can explain why MILLIONS of people haven't been shot, seeing as how they own firearms.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I have something to show you, that proves you to be in error; but I would rather see how you FEEL it would make it harder.
    Isn't it obvious?
    Do you really FEEL I need to go into details?

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Isn't it obvious?
    Do you really FEEL I need to go into details?
    You may think it's obvious; but please, go into detail why you think it's going to make it harder.

    Unless you're not confident to defend your assertion(s).
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  16. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    You may think it's obvious; but please, go into detail why you think it's going to make it harder.

    Unless you're not confident to defend your assertion(s).
    Bullets are needed to kill people. A gun with less bullets can kill less people. Having to reload will literally save lives.

    By the way, your signature really undercuts your argument.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    JPF (04-14-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Another question for the anti NRA crowd
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-25-2019, 12:39 PM
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 01-20-2019, 06:01 PM
  3. Question for the anti NRA crowd
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-23-2018, 07:44 AM
  4. Woo Hoo! -= part deux
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-27-2016, 07:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •