Page 39 of 102 FirstFirst ... 293536373839404142434989 ... LastLast
Results 571 to 585 of 1523

Thread: Kyle Rittenhouse

  1. #571 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,563 Times in 17,090 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    He shot a guy who had his hands up in self-defense. That makes sense to rightys.

  2. #572 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,707
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,654 Times in 4,435 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
    i do not believe he should be charged with intent to murder, just reckless endangerment and negligent homicide. he overreacted to a loony tune who was coming towards him unarmed, and shot 4 times. then as he ran away with witnesses yelling out stop him he just shot a man, he slipped and fell and a guy on a skateboard tried to wrestle the gun away from him, unarmed, like a hero, and the asshole shot him to death.
    The issue is whether the negligent homicide was a case of self-defense. If he thought the man who was trying to get his gun might use it against him and he legitimately feared for his life, then he has a possible defense; especially since the man yelled he was going to kill him. Or, whether the man was "falling" toward the gun rather than lunging to get it as the witness stated in an interview after the shooting occurred.

    It depends on what facts the jury believes. But, again, to try to reach conclusions now before the trial is even complete usually means we are basing our decisions on our political biases. Just note how the liberals want him convicted and the conservatives think he is not guilty. That is not based on facts but on bias.

  3. #573 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,754
    Thanks
    6,477
    Thanked 11,418 Times in 7,537 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    He shot a guy who had his hands up in self-defense.
    .
    No he did not shoot that guy.


  4. #574 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flush View Post
    The issue is whether the negligent homicide was a case of self-defense. If he thought the man who was trying to get his gun might use it against him and he legitimately feared for his life, then he has a possible defense; especially since the man yelled he was going to kill him.
    "Possible"?

  5. #575 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerdberg View Post
    He shot a guy who had his hands up in self-defense.
    Did he?

  6. #576 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,563 Times in 17,090 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    No he did not shoot that guy.

    The guy was injured by him and is testifying right now. I suppose you think these people should be punished for stealing his bullets.

  7. #577 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,707
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,654 Times in 4,435 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    "Possible"?
    Yes. Possible meaning if the facts meet the requirements for self-defense under WI law.

  8. #578 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,707
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,654 Times in 4,435 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    He shot a guy who had his hands up in self-defense. That makes sense to rightys.
    Which guy was that in your picture?

  9. #579 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,754
    Thanks
    6,477
    Thanked 11,418 Times in 7,537 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The guy was injured by him and is testifying right now. I suppose you think these people should be punished for stealing his bullets.
    Not that guy in the photo I posted. Kyle restrained from shooting him.
    You’re talking about the convicted criminal that was in illegal possession of a gun he was brandishing.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to anonymoose For This Post:

    Sailor (11-08-2021)

  11. #580 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flush View Post
    Yes. Possible meaning if the facts meet the requirements for self-defense under WI law.
    939.48  Self-defense and defense of others.

    (1)  A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.



    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/III/48/1m

  12. #581 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,595
    Thanks
    46,750
    Thanked 68,617 Times in 51,912 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    939.48  Self-defense and defense of others.

    (1)  A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.

    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/III/48/1m
    This is going to be really cool.

    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  13. #582 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,563 Times in 17,090 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Which guy was that in your picture?
    I watched the testimony. It was not a picture.

  14. #583 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,221
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked 3,581 Times in 2,074 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 92 Times in 88 Posts

    Default


  15. #584 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,221
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked 3,581 Times in 2,074 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 92 Times in 88 Posts

    Default


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to ziggy For This Post:

    Minister of Truth (11-08-2021)

  17. #585 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,649
    Thanks
    9,766
    Thanked 33,617 Times in 21,480 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Watching the Rittenhouse trial today....

    I think the kid is going down.


    He killed that guy, then chased down two more people and shot them.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    christiefan915 (11-08-2021), evince (11-08-2021), Guno צְבִי (11-08-2021)

Similar Threads

  1. Kyle Rittenhouse is an idiot
    By WalterWilson in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-05-2021, 02:57 PM
  2. Kyle Rittenhouse suing Biden, campaign
    By anonymoose in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-05-2020, 10:10 AM
  3. Kyle Rittenhouse -THE TRUTH
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-23-2020, 04:31 AM
  4. Kyle Rittenhouse - Trumpper
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 362
    Last Post: 09-03-2020, 02:48 PM
  5. Trump DEFENDS Kyle Rittenhouse as we all should
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-03-2020, 12:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •