ThatOwlWoman (03-01-2021)
Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Minister of Truth, The Anonymous, USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, Legion, Truth Detector, Niche Political Commentor, Superfreak, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, Lord Yurt, OG Yurt, Yakuda, ParachuteAdams and Son of the Revolution |
I currently lean towards number two, but keep an open mind.
It would be nice if we had more intel on emergence: the transition from non-life to life. There is zero chance something as mind boggling complex as even a single eukaryotic cell just appeared on the scene without an incredible sequence of interim events. Unless we were seeded from another planetary body.
Three Possible End-Member Scenarios for the Origin of Life
1) The origin of life may have been a miracle.
2) The origin of life was an event fully consistent with chemistry and physics, but one that was almost infinitely unlikely and required an improbable sequence of numerous steps.
3) The universe is organized in such a way that life is an inevitable consequence of chemistry, given an appropriate environment and sufficient time.
Source credit: Dr. Robert Hazen, George Mason University
ThatOwlWoman (03-01-2021)
It's a form of the junkyard tornado fallacy.
That is a good one - a tornado blows the junkyard into a 747 jet.
We are obviously missing almost all the details of what happened before primitive archea and primitive eukaryotic cells.
We can synthesize amino acids under laboratory conditions. But that is still one thousand light years away from synthesizing something as complex as a cell.
As child of a scientist and mother of another, and a spiritual being connected to all the life on the this planet (like all of us)... I'm going with #3.
We simply do not know enough about life forms on THIS planet, let alone others. We don't know as much of biochemistry as we want to. We can sequence DNA, but we cannot replicate what it does.
Given our infantile state of growth as a species, I'd say that that is an excellent thing!
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
CASPER (03-01-2021), cordeela (03-02-2021), Cypress (02-28-2021), Lightbringer (03-01-2021)
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
Cypress (02-28-2021), ThatOwlWoman (02-28-2021)
ThatOwlWoman (02-28-2021)
great points
What is weird to me is that even after 4 billion years, life apparently only evolved once on earth. Every living thing today is a genetic descendent of those first microbes from 3.8 billion years ago.
I just wonder why life did not evolve more than once on earth? If life is so resilient, why didn't different genetic strains of life evolve, or why didn't entirely different life forms evolve here?
ThatOwlWoman (03-01-2021)
Funny you should ask that. It has been discussed and studied already.
IN 4.5 billion years of Earthly history, life as we know it arose just once. Every living thing on our planet shares the same chemistry, and can be traced back to “LUCA”, the last universal common ancestor. So we assume that life must have been really hard to get going, only arising when a nigh-on-impossible set of circumstances combine.
Or was it? Simple experiments by biologists aiming to recreate life’s earliest moments are challenging that assumption. Life, it seems, is a matter of basic chemistry – no magic required, no rare ingredients, no bolt from the blue.
And that suggests an even more intriguing possibility. Rather than springing into existence just once in some chemically blessed primordial pond, life may have had many origins. It could have got going over and over again in many different forms for hundreds of thousands of years, only becoming what we see today when everything else was wiped out it in Earth’s first ever mass extinction. In its earliest days on the planet, life as we know it might not have been alone.
https://www.newscientist.com/article...ut-many-times/
christiefan915 (02-28-2021), ThatOwlWoman (03-01-2021)
"And that suggests an even more intriguing possibility. Rather than springing into existence just once in some chemically blessed primordial pond, life may have had many origins. It could have got going over and over again in many different forms for hundreds of thousands of years"
I have heard that hypothesis too; the multiple evolutionary events hypothesis..
I like the idea as a hypothesis. But the scientist in me sees it as speculative at this time.
AProudLefty (02-28-2021)
ThatOwlWoman (03-01-2021)
Bookmarks