The judge didn't say it. The prosecutors called out the laundry list of Nelson's lies during their rebuttal. They used the word 'story' a few times.
The most glaring lie Nelson told was that the prosecutor had to prove beyond a doubt that Floyd didn't die from carbon monoxide, or from his health conditions.
That should get him sanctioned.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
The judge overseeing the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin on Monday excoriated House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters after she urged protesters to "get more confrontational" if the jury did not return a guilty verdict for the murder of George Floyd.
Judge Peter Cahill told Chauvin's defense team that the California Democrat "may have given you something on appeal that may result in his whole trial being overturned."
"I wish elected officials would stop talking about this case, especially in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch and our function," he said.
You replied to this comment. I thought you were referring to it.
Yes. The judge was angry at Waters. Why do you suppose he wasn't as angry at Tucker Carlson?
He refused to grant a mistrial based on the Waters comments. He said that there might be an issue for an appeal. We know that there is little chance of that based on Waters.
He also said the same thing when the defense claimed prosecutorial misconduct for the reason I stated above.
No mistrial, but he can try for an appeal.
You omit the fact that the judge said that he instructed the jury NOT to watch the news, so he wasn't that concerned about Waters. To admit to hearing that by any juror is to admit to ignoring a judge's direction.
What are the odds of that?
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
yes, a conviction, but even thats not enough for the far left lunatics, maybe a public beheading would satisfy them. The rioters are still going at it, sooooo, this really has nothing to do with Floyd or Chauvin, its about stealing looting and destroying the property of those who have worked for it (of all races).
What will satisfy them???? its a serious question, if you answer, be specific and detailed or don't bother.
Bookmarks