Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 82

Thread: And the news keeps getting worse for the democrat party

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,334 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FastLane View Post
    The Dems presented their evidence for their "lock solid case" of a case their 17 witnesses were evaluated. The Senate decided the House did not prove their case. Now perhaps if the House had not been so sloppy with making their case things might have turned out different. You only have Adam Schiff, Pelosi, and Nadler to blame. Not the Senate.
    ...or rushed. But seriously; there was NOTHING to this lie filled narrative and when Trump released the transcript, Schiff was too stupid to retreat.

    Nadler: ‘Evidence is undisputed’ for impeachment"
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020)

  3. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FastLane View Post
    The Dems presented their evidence for their "lock solid case" of a case their 17 witnesses were evaluated. The Senate decided the House did not prove their case. Now perhaps if the House had not been so sloppy with making their case things might have turned out different. You only have Adam Schiff, Pelosi, and Nadler to blame. Not the Senate.
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.

  4. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    They argued that the House made its own case, in that it interviewed witnesses and delivered the Senate articles of impeachment.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Minister of Truth For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020), Truth Detector (02-12-2020)

  6. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    Democrats claimed they had overwhelming evidence of guilt. When they realize they had no such thing, they started calling for the Senate to do what they clearly failed to do in the House.

    Don't like the result, tough shit. Talk to Nancy's peons in the House that did such a poor job they should have prepared better.

  7. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The House was anything but sloppy.

    We have a president who refuses to obey the law or act with American values.
    Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    Mason Michaels (02-12-2020)

  9. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,334 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    In 1999, Democrats in the Senate refused to convict BillyBob Clinton for Obstruction of Justice and Perjury he admitted to, REAL crimes. The notion that leftists who defended the corrupt rot that is the Party of the Jackass can now lecture ANYONE on what is right is laughably stupid and inept.

    Obstruction of Congress and Maladministration are NOT impeachable crimes, will never be impeachable crimes and one has to be a low IQ, uneducated dumbass to even make such moronic arguments.

    So if Nadler argued that impeaching Clinton for REAL crimes was lowering the standard, WTF does he think he just did without any real crimes????

    Good lord; leftists give new meaning to the words, gullible lemmings.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020)

  11. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,334 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    The House was anything but sloppy.
    We have a president who refuses to obey the law or act with American values.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020)

  13. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Democrats claimed they had overwhelming evidence of guilt.
    They did, but that's beside the point. In a trial, you try to get as much relevant evidence as possible. Unless it's a shame trial, then evidence and facts don't matter. That's why I knew the Republicans were going to block witnesses and documents.

  14. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    23,501
    Thanks
    3,062
    Thanked 9,759 Times in 7,263 Posts
    Groans
    49
    Groaned 1,060 Times in 1,005 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    I don't think it is possible to re-educate indoctrinated morons.
    I know for a fact that it's not possible to educate a blob of bullshit.

  15. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    They did, but that's beside the point. In a trial, you try to get as much relevant evidence as possible. Unless it's a shame trial, then evidence and facts don't matter. That's why I knew the Republicans were going to block witnesses and documents.
    Apparently not since after all the witnesses they called claiming they had overwhelming evidence, they demanded the Senate do what they clearly didn't do.

    Nowhere in the definition of trial is the word witnesses. It says examination of evidence.

  16. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    34,321
    Thanks
    3,498
    Thanked 11,601 Times in 9,273 Posts
    Groans
    632
    Groaned 1,405 Times in 1,371 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    History will record,the Senate didn't hold a trial,and that outside of Romney.
    Every Republican Senator was a coward.
    AM I, I AM's,AM I.
    What day is Michaelmas on?

  17. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    It's not merely because he's a RepubliCon...it's because the criminal will sign any shit they put in front of his repulsive orange face. He needs them to help him stay in office in order for him to stay out of prison.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  18. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Apparently not since after all the witnesses they called claiming they had overwhelming evidence, they demanded the Senate do what they clearly didn't do.

    Nowhere in the definition of trial is the word witnesses. It says examination of evidence.
    Testimonies from witnesses are, obviously, considered evidence.
    While they did have overwhelming evidence, it's beside the point. In a trial, you gather as much relevant information as possible. Unless the trial is a sham, that is.

  19. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,126 Times in 9,657 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Testimonies from witnesses are, obviously, considered evidence.
    While they did have overwhelming evidence, it's beside the point. In a trial, you gather as much relevant information as possible. Unless the trial is a sham, that is.
    but all evidence is not testimony. and even testimony is only evidence if it isn't hearsay.

    you're fucking up with your arguments right now.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Hermes Thoth For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-13-2020)

  21. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Testimonies from witnesses are, obviously, considered evidence.
    While they did have overwhelming evidence, it's beside the point. In a trial, you gather as much relevant information as possible. Unless the trial is a sham, that is.
    The House called their witnesses. If they didn't do a good job, it's not a sham if someone else doesn't do what someone else wants them to do.

    The claim of overwhelming evidence is the point.

    In a trial, by definition, you examine the evidence.

    Trump is acquitted and there isn't a goddamn thing you can do about it is whine like the rest of the nigger lovers whose boy left in 2017 and who got their ass kicked in the 2016 election.

Similar Threads

  1. BREAKING NEWS: Top democrat party witness is FAKE NEWS
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-15-2019, 06:38 AM
  2. APP - Bad news for democrat party
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2018, 06:53 AM
  3. APP - Great news for the democrat party
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-13-2018, 05:39 AM
  4. The Democrat Party Is in Worse Shape Than You Thought
    By MAGA MAN in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-09-2017, 05:25 PM
  5. It keeps getting worse for the democrat party
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-25-2016, 02:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •