TEXAS DEFENDS THE UNBORN

[Into the Night]

It has never been about women's bodies.

Most believe a human life begins during or after the first trimester.

This is about dehumanizing the unborn.

Nope. You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.
Abortion for convenience is murder.

[Into the Night]

Nothing is stopping them from coming to Massachusetts to get scraped. Women have rights here.

Still, Biden should set up federal clinics in Texas that aren't under the jurisdiction of local authorities.

That would put the fucking cracker Jesus freaks in their place.

How is it possible to not viscerally hate all of those creeps?

But children have no rights there. They get murdered for convenience.

[Into the Night]

The majority of the country supports a baby's right to live. ...full stop!

Sorry dude, you don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

[Into the Night]

Texas, a state with one of the highest teen pregnancies and that has one of the highest child poverty rates, your good ole boy repukes are not doing children any good unless they scribble in their dictator laws to agree to use their money to support a child when it is born until they turn 18 as a result of being born into poverty or as a result of a mother dying in labor as a result of being incapable of carrying a full term pregnancy or incestuous rape, etc."

A new report released Thursday ranks Texas 43rd in overall child well-being based on measures of education, financial security, health, and community factors, down from 41st in 2016.

Of the 7.4 million children in the state, 21 percent live in poverty, according to the 2018 State of Texas Children Report, issued by Austin-based Center for Public Policy Priorities (CPPP), a progressive nonprofit that analyzes state-level socioeconomic data. The report is part of the Kids Count Project, a state-by-state effort to track the status of children in the United States funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, a national advocacy group for child well-being."

...deleted Holy Link...

Random numbers are not data. Argument from randU fallacy.

[Into the Night]

Not everyone can. You can guess that the poor and minorities would suffer the most. Nothing pertains to the wealthy.

Suffer?? You are talking about murdering a child!

[Cypress]

It is not subjective. It is the law.

Irrelevant.

Which Texas has done.

You bible thumpers have been hollering at me for decades that science has proven a human being's life begins at conception.

It is striking how rapidly you abandoned that claim in the face of this logic:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...27#post4643727

Now that you concede it is completely subjective where we draw the boundary of when a fetus becomes a human being, my work is done. Old white men in a legislature just codified their opinion by statutory law.

I have always maintained that the question of when a human being's life begins is a metaphysical question, not a scientific one.

[Into the Night]

You bible thumpers

Not a bible thumper.

have been hollering at me for decades that science has proven a human being's life begins at conception.

Science has no proofs. Science is an open functional system.
At the moment of conception, however, there exists a cell that can replicate into an entire human being. To destroy it for convenience is murder in my opinion. Texas has taken a looser view. It defines abortion past the point of a heartbeat to be murder.

It is striking how rapidly you abandoned that claim in the face of this logic:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...27#post4643727

I have abandoned nothing. Neither has Texas.

Now that you concede it is completely subjective where we draw the boundary of when a fetus becomes a human being, my work is done. Old white men in a legislature just codified their opinion by statutory law.

That is correct. Deal with it.

I have always maintained that the question of when a human being's life begins is a metaphysical question, not a scientific one.

Irrelevant.

[Nordberg]

Rightys defend nobody with abortion laws. They help unwanted kids get born. They resign them to a home where they can not be afforded or are not wanted for other reasons.
If rightys really cared about the potential kids, they wouldbring them into their homes or provide coverage for feeding them, educating them and healthcare. Rightys, for some reason, just want kids born. After that, they are done with them.

[ExpressLane]

That includes spontaneous abortions the Texas law does not cover that .

[ExpressLane]

SAVE THE FETUS/SCREW THE CHILD so that they can be killed in their schools and by gun violence or Covid mask free zones. Fuck off!!

Texas Ted Cruz will ponder how much he loves kids and life the next time he's in Cancun during a killer storm and power outage.

You are an idiot

[AProudLefty]

That includes spontaneous abortions the Texas law does not cover that .

LOL. That's true. What will they do when a woman smokes a lot, does drugs and/or drinking a lot?

[ExpressLane]

"Lot" of "babies".

So if they aren't aborted they become zebras?

[ExpressLane]

LOL. That's true. What will they do when a woman smokes a lot, does drugs and/or drinking a lot?

Call them idiots.

[AProudLefty]

So if they aren't aborted they become zebras?

Yep. Or they become ugly monkeys.

[AProudLefty]

Call them idiots.

Yes they're idiots indeed. Doing things that are harmful to the fetuses are pretty dumb.