Another fake Democrat poll exposed

[Into the Night]

weighting wasn't proven wrong bro

Weighting is not allowed in statistical math. You cannot use cooked data in statistical math. Denial of mathematics.

[Into the Night]

Ever since Marbury v. Madison in 1803, it has had that authority. It is very much part of our system that it has that authority.

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

[Walt]

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

It does have the power to interpret the Constitution.

Kavanaugh is now claiming that the US Supreme Court has the final power to interpret the state constitutions. I disagree on this new power grab.

[artichoke]

It does have the power to interpret the Constitution.

Kavanaugh is now claiming that the US Supreme Court has the final power to interpret the state constitutions. I disagree on this new power grab.

James Madison mentioned adding the power of vetoing state laws to the federal government's enumerated powers and the outrage was so sweeping that it almost derailed the entire constitutional convention. It was summarily dropped and never brought up again. Nothing more clearly demonstrates that the federal government was never authorized to overturn state laws than this.

[Walt]

Nothing more clearly demonstrates that the federal government was never authorized to overturn state laws than this.

Your boy Kavanaugh disagrees not just with that, but also that federal government has the right to rewrite state constitutions.

[artichoke]

Your boy Kavanaugh disagrees not just with that, but also that federal government has the right to rewrite state constitutions.

I haven't seen anything that indicates that, but it he does, which I'm highly skeptical of, then he is completely violating his oath and butchering the Constitution.

[katzgar]

Another provably fake poll. This time, it's Quinnipac. They had to over-sample registered Democrats by 10% to manufacture their new claim about the child-molesting Alzheimer's patient now having "double-digit lead." They sampled 36% registered Democrats and 26% registered Republicans to make this happen.

This is why you ALWAYS click on the methodology and see how they got their numbers. This is the same kind of outright lie that caused people to think Hillary had a 92% chance of beating President Trump.

Attachment 15384

Biden Holds Double-Digit Lead Over Trump, New Poll Shows

Imagine the headlines conservatives could fabricate by wildly over-sampling registered Republicans like this:

-Majority of Americans want Obama administration officials prosecuted for treason

-Those who want to finish building the wall have a "double-digit lead" over those who do not

-American people overwhelmingly want power-abusing Democrat judges impeached and purged from federal judiciary

President elect Biden

[Walt]

Weighting is not allowed in statistical math.

Yes, it is.

[artichoke]

Yes, it is.

[Micawber]

We won.

[Walt]

GOP voters dominated the House & Senate races, then voted Biden?

The Republicans dominated nothing. The Democrats won the popular vote at all levels. The won the majority of the House elections, and would have won more if not for gerrymandering. In the US Senate, Democrats gained seats, and still might win control of the Senate.

[artichoke]

We won.

Cheating isn't winning.

[artichoke]

The Republicans dominated nothing.

Except for the House and Senate races, sure.

The Democrats won the popular vote at all levels.

There is no Electoral College for House and Senate races you fucking imbecile.

How did the GOP win more than a dozen House races if Democrats won the popular vote "at all levels?"

The won the majority of the House elections, and would have won more if not for gerrymandering. In the US Senate, Democrats gained seats, and still might win control of the Senate.

I mean, the GOP is +10 and Democrats are -9. See for yourself. What Democrats struggle with math as bad as they do literacy?

And let's not forget, all of this was after 6 months straight of you arrogant imbeciles taunting everyone about your big "blue wave" that was coming. That's NOTHING LIKE losing big in the House and Republicans holding onto the Senate.

Again, arrogant + idiot = Democrat.

[Walt]

How did the GOP win more than a dozen House races if Democrats won the popular vote "at all levels?"

First off, Democrats won the majority of the House races, which would be the first hint that maybe the also won the majority of the vote. Secondly, because of gerrymandering, to win the majority of the House races, they had to win a supermajority of the popular vote. They win races that they win by more votes than Republicans do due to gerrymandering.

I think Arminius is having trouble understanding the difference between winning fewer races than in the last very successful year, and losing most of the races. Democrats won the majority of the House races. They may also win a majority in the Senate.

What three predictions did I make?
1) Democrats would keep the House, and they did that.
2) Biden would almost certainly win. There was a very slight chance trump could win, but it was extremely doubtful. Biden won.
3) Democrats had a 50/50 chance of winning the Senate. They still have a chance of winning, but it is less than 50% chance now. Maybe a 20% chance.

[artichoke]

First off, Democrats won the majority of the House races, which would be the first hint that maybe the also won the majority of the vote.

I mean, you can just keep talking past the evidence already posted, but it's not going to get you anywhere.

Republicans won 28 of 29 most competitive House seats, added 3 state legislatures, did not lose a single House seat.

Again, the GOP is +10 and Democrats are -9. See for yourself.

Secondly, because of gerrymandering, to win the majority of the House races, they had to win a supermajority of the popular vote. They win races that they win by more votes than Republicans do due to gerrymandering.

You don't get to make up your own voting districts and insist that Democrats WOULD'VE won if the districts were different. You also don't get to just make shit up and assert, without any evidence, that all the Democrat losses were due to some extraordinary amount of gerrymandering that doesn't exist in every other district.

I think Arminius is having trouble understanding the difference between winning fewer races than in the last very successful year, and losing most of the races. Democrats won the majority of the House races. They may also win a majority in the Senate.

Which, even accepted at face value, is NOTHING LIKE the "blue wave" bullshit they taunted everyone with for six months straight. And is also nothing like the guy who didn't campaign getting more votes than any president in history. Democrats should have won EVERY House and Senate race if Democrats turned out in those kinds of numbers.

Comprehend it yet?

What three predictions did I make?
1) Democrats would keep the House, and they did that. [was inevitable because of which seats were up for election this time around]
2) Biden would almost certainly win. There was a very slight chance trump could win, but it was extremely doubtful. Biden won. [didn't come true]
3) Democrats had a 50/50 chance of winning the Senate. They still have a chance of winning, but it is less than 50% chance now. Maybe a 20% chance. [this was acknowledged by everyone involved]