Why is evince banned from so many threads

[Doc Dutch]

She's very likely dead as far as I can tell so there's no reason for anyone to ban her anymore.

BTW, the thread starter is a leftist who now posts under another name. Try to keep up, will you?

The question was asked while she was still here. Obviously it's stupid to ban someone who is dead. It's cowardly for any douchebag to ban mass numbers of people like this:

[Legion]

It's cowardly for any douchebag to ban mass numbers of people like this.

So you say.

What's the threshold for "bravery" when employing threadbans?

Give me a number.

I'll understand if you don't want to, of course.

[archives]

So you say.

What's the threshold for "bravery" when employing threadbans?

Give me a number.

I'll understand if you don't want to, of course.

One

It is a forum, meaning an exchange of views, not a marketplace to sell views, it ain’t talk radio, if you are afraid of being challenged don’t post, all you are doing is talking to yourself

[Legion]

The question was asked while she was still here.

It was, yet you claimed "the thread starter is afraid of her".

She's banned because the thread starter is afraid of her.

Then you claimed that people who ban you are "cowards" and "douchebags".

Are these people also "cowards" and "douchebags", according to you?

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

I ban people.

I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.

I don't allow racists, or haters in.

Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.

I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.

It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'

Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread

There are a handful of posters here who are such good-for-nothing trolls they don't deserve to be allowed to post in my threads. Or anyone else's either. Ergo, I ban only them from every thread I start.

The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.

Why, I see your name in the ban booster chorus....

[Legion]

It is a forum, meaning an exchange of views, not a marketplace to sell views, it ain’t talk radio, if you are afraid of being challenged don’t post, all you are doing is talking to yourself

So you say.

These folks disagree:

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

I ban people.

I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.

I don't allow racists, or haters in.

Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.

I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.

It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'

Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread

There are a handful of posters here who are such good-for-nothing trolls they don't deserve to be allowed to post in my threads. Or anyone else's either. Ergo, I ban only them from every thread I start.

The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.

[Doc Dutch]

So you say.

What's the threshold for "bravery" when employing threadbans?

Give me a number.

I'll understand if you don't want to, of course.

Zero.

What's your number? I understand if you are cowardly and afraid of getting your ass kicked every day. Snowflakes like you need a "safe space", but I don't agree with the practice because it is cowardly and dishonest.

[archives]

So you say.

These folks disagree:

Care less what “these folks” think, I am stating the reality, a forum isn’t a place to sell your views, only those afraid of being invalidated ban other posters

[Legion]

Zero.

That's not what you said before, is it?

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

What's your number?

My number is as many as it takes to can habitual trolls. If you don't like being banned, don't troll.

I don't agree with the practice because it is cowardly and dishonest.

You seem to "agree with the practice" when people you agree with politically use it, and you said so.

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

[Legion]

Care less what “these folks” think, I am stating the reality, a forum isn’t a place to sell your views, only those afraid of being invalidated ban other posters

Your opinion has been accorded all the consideration it merits.

What's your opinion of people who announce that they're "putting you on ignore"? Are they "afraid of being invalidated"?

[Doc Dutch]

That's not what you said before, is it?

My number is as many as it takes to can habitual trolls. If you don't like being banned, don't troll.

You seem to "agree with the practice" when people you agree with politically use it, and you said so.

You seem confused about the difference between understanding and condoning. No matter since I consider you to be unsalvageable but others still have a chance.

It was, yet you claimed "the thread starter is afraid of her". ...

Correct. Why else would a person like you habitually ban members?

If you consider me a troll, then why do you spend so much time on me every day?

[Legion]

Why else would a person like you habitually ban members? If you consider me a troll, then why do you spend so much time on me every day?

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls. That's you.

If you consider me a troll, then why do you spend so much time on me every day?

I sometimes enjoy seeing your posts and responding to them, because I can.

Don't be flattered. I used to threadban Desh, too, but I enjoyed engaging with her in her own threads.

BTW, I very much doubt the the OP of this thread "feared" Desh.

[Doc Dutch]

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls. That's you.



I sometimes enjoy seeing your posts and responding to them, because I can.

Don't be flattered. I used to threadban Desh, too, but I enjoyed engaging with her in her own threads.

BTW, I very much doubt the the OP of this thread "feared" Desh.

Sorry for speaking above your level of comprehension. The OP of this thread hasn't banned anyone. He asked the question "Why is evince banned from so many threads" my answer was "She's banned because the thread starter is afraid of her. It happens to me a lot by JPP cowards like Teflon Don/ILA/Joe Hiden/et al, Legion and other douchebags."

You're lying claiming I said otherwise. Sad, but expected from a lowlife Nazi scumbag.

[Legion]

The OP of this thread hasn't banned anyone. He asked the question "Why is evince banned from so many threads"; my answer was "She's banned because the thread starter is afraid of her.

And you talk about "comprehension"?

She's banned because the thread starter is afraid of her.

Where's your evidence that the thread starter who was Oracle Of JPP 714 AKA Oracle Of Delphi AKA UnkaRitche AKA Liberalavenger was afraid of Desh?

[Doc Dutch]

And you talk about "comprehension"?

Where's your evidence that Oracle Of JPP 714 AKA Oracle Of Delphi AKA UnkaRitche AKA Liberalavenger was afraid of Desh?

Yes. Obviously you need some.

Never said he did. I don't even know him. He obviously didn't ban Evince since he was the one asking the question. Sane, mature, non-Nazi, non-fuckwads can figure it out.

[Legion]

Never said he did.

She's banned because the thread starter is afraid of her.

Do you know who started this thread? It was Oracle Of JPP 714 AKA Oracle Of Delphi AKA UnkaRitche AKA Liberalavenger.

Where's your evidence that Oracle Of JPP 714 AKA Oracle Of Delphi AKA UnkaRitche AKA Liberalavenger was afraid of Desh?