A 'COWARD' BANS MEMBERS from commentary on a POLITICAL board.

[Centerleftfl]

Just thought I would mention it! Now to address the COWARDS commentary. LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS could NOT catch up to the lies of commission, omission or STRAIGHT up in your face LIES that have been foisted upon this country causing MASSIVE death, destruction and DEBT.

I bring you exhibit #1. Of course the LITANY of lies surrounding the 'opportunity' to even take the photo belies any know MANIPULATION OF INTELLIGENCE in US history. Of course, we don't know yet the extent about the master manipulator's machinations depth and DESTRUCTION.

[Centerleftfl]

And this is one of a LITANY of whoppers--before the election. Never mind after....p
Trump Team Claims ‘No Contact’ With Russia
​
By The New York Times•July 12, 2017

Trump advisers have often insisted that the campaign had no contact with various Russian insiders — claims

[canceled.2021.2]

bye bye thread

[TOP]

???? So sad when this happens.....

[Geeko Sportivo]

Why would any credible intelligent forum have a facility to ban certain users by name from threads- YET HAVE THE OPTION TO IGNORE ANYONE OF THEIR CHOOSING?

Most intelligent forums provide a feature to completely ban trolls and enemies completely from their online experience in the forum.

So this says more about the administration than it does about the Thread banning idiots!

[Legion]

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

I ban people.

I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.

I don't allow racists, or haters in.

Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.

I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.

It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'

Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.

[Earl]

Thread bans prevent all loons like you from posting on the link.

An ignore only shields the person from you.

[John Barron]

It must be exhausting being a Trump supporter.

Every day you have to defend an idiotic comment or insane action,

because you can't admit you made a mistake and voted a total moron

into the most powerful office in the world.

[moon]

Why would any credible intelligent forum have a facility to ban certain users by name from threads- YET HAVE THE OPTION TO IGNORE ANYONE OF THEIR CHOOSING?

Most intelligent forums provide a feature to completely ban trolls and enemies completely from their online experience in the forum.

So this says more about the administration than it does about the Thread banning idiots!

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes.
Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic.
Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread, the repetitious losers such as Earl, Legion etc, the gross gutter- crawlers, CFM, volsrock etc., the socks and the degenerate contrarians such as the Brit maggot.
At other times you might allow these throwbacks access to your thread in order to make fools of themselves and thus reinforce your points.
They are easy to manipulate . You can also fine-tune your thread-ban, excluding the total assheads , the graphic-swampers, such as Arminius and Truth Deflector along with the overtly insane on occasions but permitting those on your list that you wish to specifically target .
That's how you survive the excesses of JPP- not by ' Ignore ', not by permanent banning, but by putting your trolls to work. They sometimes even bump their own humiliations.


Haw, haw.................................haw.

[Mason Michaels]

Thread bans prevent all loons like you from posting on the link.

An ignore only shields the person from you.

Or banning a Trump cum sump pump like Earl

[Into the Night]

Just thought I would mention it! Now to address the COWARDS commentary. LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS could NOT catch up to the lies of commission, omission or STRAIGHT up in your face LIES that have been foisted upon this country causing MASSIVE death, destruction and DEBT.

I bring you exhibit #1. Of course the LITANY of lies surrounding the 'opportunity' to even take the photo belies any know MANIPULATION OF INTELLIGENCE in US history. Of course, we don't know yet about the master manipulator's machinations have been.

Base rate fallacy. NYT is fake news.

[Into the Night]

Thread bans prevent all loons like you from posting on the link.

An ignore only shields the person from you.

Actually it doesn't. Nothing prevents an open thread from discussing the same things a closed thread is discussing. Where such an open thread exists, running parallel to a closed thread, the closed thread usually dies off pretty quickly.

Banning people only lets them talk about you behind your back. You have accomplished nothing but removing yourself from the conversation.

Attempting to build kiddie pools by banning users never really works.

[Into the Night]

It must be exhausting being a Trump supporter.

Every day you have to defend an idiotic comment or insane action,

because you can't admit you made a mistake and voted a total moron

into the most powerful office in the world.

What mistake?

[Into the Night]

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore '

You tried that once, and found it didn't work.

but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes.

None.

Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic.

Since you consider anyone that disagrees with you is a 'troll', and since you are a liberal, you consider any conservative a 'troll'. One of your favorite buzzwords.

Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread, the repetitious losers such as Earl, Legion etc, the gross gutter- crawlers, CFM, volsrock etc., the socks and the degenerate contrarians such as the Brit maggot.

Since you also consider anyone that disagrees with you a 'sock', same thing applies. YALSA.

At other times you might allow these throwbacks access to your thread in order to make fools of themselves and thus reinforce your points.

Assumption of victory fallacy. You rarely make any points at all.

They are easy to manipulate.

Inversion fallacy.

You can also fine-tune your thread-ban, excluding the total assheads , the graphic-swampers, such as Arminius and Truth Deflector along with the overtly insane on occasions but permitting those on your list that you wish to specifically target.

Specifically targeting a user and to goad them is to be a troll. You are what you accuse others of being.

That's how you survive the excesses of JPP- not by ' Ignore ', not by permanent banning, but by putting your trolls to work.

Inversion fallacy.

They sometimes even bump their own humiliations.

Inversion fallacy.

[moon]

Into the Night Soil;

Inversion fallacy.

Seems I've upset a sock.


Haw, haw........................haw.