You have to have a scanning electron microscope to even DETECT virus particles. They are infinitesimally small. They are pouring out of those masks at every turn through all the gaps and any part that isn't sealed. That's just a fact. And it's a virus with a 99% survival rate, so who gives a shit in the first place?
These 12 Graphs Show Mask Mandates Do Nothing To Stop COVID
Trumpet (10-30-2020)
katzgar
Verified User
This message is hidden because katzgar is on your ignore list.
Poor Arminius is not right in the skull.
Lock Him Up
How bad were your grades in the 7th grade that you do not know basic science and how viruses travel, live, and spread? Are you still in the 7th grade?
Wash yer hands
Avoid public toilets
Dont fuck anything you can find the hips on
Masks are not doing much
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
artichoke (10-30-2020)
Oklahoma turns out to be a mask experiment. They did not intend it for that, but some communities enforced masks and distancing. They have half the corona those run by Repuibs have. https://oklahoman.com/article/566981...eres-the-proof
Apparently the COVID numbers in all those graphs didn't get the memo. They evidently don't know how "basic science" works, either.
My background is microbiology dumb-ass. Find a new invalid ad hominem fallacy to try condescending with.
See what I mean about how every time you try, even just a little, to actually debate instead of just whining all the time, you get your ass handed to you?
Correlation does not imply causation, Doctor Nerdberg.
If you read the fine print on most consumer masks you will see something along the line of “not intended for medical purposes and has not been tested to reduce the transmission of disease.”
Masks can work well when they’re fully sealed, properly fitted, changed often, and have a filter designed for virus-sized particles. This represents none of the common masks available on the consumer market, making universal masking much more of a confidence trick than a medical solution.
Mask manufacturers should be conducting scientific tests evaluating masks specifically for their ability to reduce the spread of coronavirus.
The Food and Drug Administration and CDC should be making recommendations on which masks to use and approving masks based on their scientific efficacy rather than promoting the wrapping of any piece of miscellaneous material around your face.
Effective masks, if they exist, should be distributed to highly vulnerable groups for use only in rare and extenuating circumstances.
There would be little point for the population at large to wear masks all the time because it is not possible to eradicate a virus or stop its spread.
Universal use of unscientific face coverings is closer to medieval superstition than it is to science, but many powerful institutions have too much political capital invested in the mask narrative at this point, so the dogma is perpetuated.
- The narrative says that if cases go down it’s because masks succeeded.
- It says that if cases go up it’s because masks succeeded in preventing more cases.
- The narrative assumes rather than proves that masks work, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.
The narrative further ignores places like Sweden and Georgia, which never required masks in the first place, and it suppresses new scientific evidence if it doesn’t support desired political results, such as data from the world’s only randomized trial investigating if masks actually protect from COVID-19. Even a Nobel laureate has been canceled because his COVID charts and data were found to be undesirable.
Bookmarks