Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 145

Thread: For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not.....

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    barren Jarot....
    damn......I hope so.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Untrue, please show me some support for that claim? He most certainly could still be prosecuted in criminal court once he is done being president.

    You are the exact dumb fuck I was talking about.
    speaking of criminal.......Horowitz made 8 referrals to the FBI for criminal investigation
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Which idiot claimed that? Trump?
    Last edited by Cinnabar; 12-08-2019 at 08:41 PM.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  5. The Following 2 Users Groan At Cinnabar For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-08-2019), Earl (12-09-2019)

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,706
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,653 Times in 4,435 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Since Trump has not been charged with anything there is nothing to be exonerated from.

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-08-2019), Earl (12-09-2019), Stretch (12-08-2019), USFREEDOM911 (12-08-2019)

  8. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Careful they will get triggered!
    Dumb twat can't even spell Barron correctly!!

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019), Stretch (12-08-2019)

  10. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    damn......I hope so.
    No sadly, he has spawned little Jarheads.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Stretch (12-08-2019)

  12. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Untrue, please show me some support for that claim? He most certainly could still be prosecuted in criminal court once he is done being president.

    You are the exact dumb fuck I was talking about.

    For what crime?

    You are spinning GayRod. You have gone completely off the rails. Trump has broke you.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), cancel2 2022 (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019)

  14. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”

    Synonyms for Not guilty:
    •adj.


    blameless (adjective) faultless,
    unimpeachable,
    immaculate,
    above suspicion,
    clear,
    good,
    irreproachable,
    stainless,
    clean,
    upright,
    untarnished,
    unsullied,
    Irreprehensible,
    impeccable,
    unblemished,
    pure.
    •unblamable (adjective) lily-white.
    •uncorrupted (adjective) un-corrupted,
    un corrupted.
    •untainted (adjective) un tainted,
    un-tainted.







    Synonyms for exonerated


    absolved,
    acquitted,
    cleared,
    exculpated,
    vindicated




    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/exonerated




    Synonyms for acquitted




    absolved,
    cleared,
    exculpated,
    exonerated,
    vindicated



    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/acquitted.




    STUPID FUCKING DUNCE.....AND YOUR LIESPEAK BULLSHIT....
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019), Stretch (12-09-2019), USFREEDOM911 (12-08-2019)

  16. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Yes it does. To say otherwise, is the dumbest thing yet.

  17. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cinnabar View Post
    Which idiot claimed that? Trump?
    It meant that to you lefties when Clinton was not removed. Why do things change when a Republican is in office?

    You took the same attitude with Supreme Court nominations. When a Republican was in office, the nomination shouldn't take place during an election year, however, when the black (POS) Democrat was in office and a vacancy came up during an election year, you no longer thought it applied.

  18. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,628 Times in 5,136 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Yes it does. To say otherwise, is the dumbest thing yet.
    Are you saying that if the Senate does not remove him, he could not be arrested when he is no longer President?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  19. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,628 Times in 5,136 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Dumb twat can't even spell Barron correctly!!
    You mentioned his name... May the wrath of God descend upon you.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  20. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Barron has two ‘r’s in it lol.

    Refusal to remove means democrats failed to bring a convincing argument to the table. I think that would make twice in the space of a year they failed to remove a duly elected President.

    The exoneration question is stupid, frankly. If the Senate rejects the articles passed by the House there’s nothing to be exonerated *from*.

    The interesting question is whether Democrats will try and pull the Trifecta lol. Do you think they will or will they throw in the towel, finally? Or cry uncle? Or tap-out?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019)

  22. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Democrats, and you sheep that follow them have been led down this trail to nowhere, so don't complain now that you are at the end and theres nothing here
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019)

  24. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,628 Times in 5,136 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Barron has two ‘r’s in it lol.

    Refusal to remove means democrats failed to bring a convincing argument to the table. I think that would make twice in the space of a year they failed to remove a duly elected President.

    The exoneration question is stupid, frankly. If the Senate rejects the articles passed by the House there’s nothing to be exonerated *from*.

    The interesting question is whether Democrats will try and pull the Trifecta lol. Do you think they will or will they throw in the towel, finally? Or cry uncle? Or tap-out?
    NO, it means Republican senators claim that there was not convincing evidence. Trump will be impeached before Christmas. Still interested in a bet? ( I doubt it)
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

Similar Threads

  1. DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends
    By SmarterthanYou in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 1049
    Last Post: 12-30-2019, 12:14 PM
  2. NBC fucks up again.
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-09-2019, 01:14 PM
  3. Silencing Free Speech = Attempting To Remove The Right To Remove Rubbish Forced Into
    By David Jeffrey Spetch in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-09-2019, 01:10 PM
  4. APP - Texas MediCaid refusal affecting Veterans
    By tekkychick in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-03-2013, 10:11 AM
  5. Republican refusal to reveal details
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2012, 03:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •