Page 18 of 25 FirstFirst ... 8141516171819202122 ... LastLast
Results 256 to 270 of 369

Thread: Fox News says Mueller report did NOT clear Trump

  1. #256 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    In America, no collusion and insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction means that, in the eyes of the law, you are innocent.
    why do you keep saying there was insufficient evidence? They did not conclude that, not by a longshot.

  2. #257 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    Hello politalker.

    The special counsel sends the report to the AG not to congress. The AG explains it to congress.

    For your review please read this thoroughly or this is a wasted exercise

    https://www.brookings.edu/testimonie...l-regulations/
    And he misrepresented it to Congress. Mueller’s team had to write a letter about it.

  3. #258 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Hello Southern Chicken,



    I disagree.

    Mueller indeed left it up to the house to proceed with charges if they deem fit. He did so create a list of possible infractions. He stated that he is prevented from bringing an indictment against a sitting president.

    The AG is likewise unable to indict the president. That task is left up to the house.
    The Attorney General’s regulations provide for reports from a special counsel to the Attorney General, and for reports from the Attorney General to Congress. For the former, there are to be annual (section 600.8(a)(2)) and closing (section 600.8(c)) reports by special counsel to the Attorney General.

  4. #259 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    In America, no collusion and insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction means that he is innocent.

    Ya esta.
    You are simply a fucking dumbshit to be repeating the same bullshit over and over.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Port Tack For This Post:

    domer76 (06-13-2019)

  6. #260 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Indeed.

    Until now, I don't recall reading of any prosecutor ever stating that although a person under investigation was not being indicted, they aren't being cleared.
    Thats because this was the president and he can't indict him, if he could have he would have.

  7. #261 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    Nor did he indicate there was reason to go farther and closed his office! No collusion no evidence of obstruction!
    How the fuck you dumbshits can clearly keep repeating there was no evidence of obstruction is amazing, that was not the case.

  8. #262 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    A prosecutor doesn’t exonerate. He either finds enough evidence to charge someone or he doesn’t
    He did but he can't charge a president. How many times must that be explained to you dumbfucks?

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Port Tack For This Post:

    domer76 (06-13-2019)

  10. #263 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Port Tack View Post
    They had plenty to indict and would have if they could have.
    And nine out of ten juries would have thrown the indictment out.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Earl (06-13-2019)

  12. #264 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Port Tack View Post
    He has the evidence and gave it to congress, it's their responsibility.
    Mueller didn't give his report to congress. He gave it to the Attorney General. The Attorney General explains it to congress

  13. #265 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Read it.
    I have. It isn't in there. So you can either back your claim by citing page and paragraph or you can admit you were wrong

  14. #266 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Port Tack View Post
    why do you keep saying there was insufficient evidence? They did not conclude that, not by a longshot.
    New American:

    "Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 22-month-long investigation of alleged Russian collusion and interference in the 2016 election is summarized in a 448-page report released (in redacted form) Thursday. The wait is over; now the frenzy begins. Enemies of President Trump have claimed — since before he was even elected — that he colluded with Russia. The report, however, makes clear that there is no evidence of those claims. And it fails to provide sufficient evidence of obstruction."

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...of-obstruction

    I will continue to answer redundant posts by the loons on the left...with redundancy.

  15. #267 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    LMAO. And indictment is warranted in a case where the individual is above the law? That's funny.
    No individual is above the law. Not even the President. The DoJ may delay the indictment, but that is all

  16. #268 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    "The Attorney General has full control over the assignment to a special counsel of additional jurisdiction (section 600.4(b)) that is “necessary in order to fully investigate and resolve the matters assigned, or to investigate new matters that come to light” during a special counsel’s investigation. A special counsel is to consult with the Attorney General, who will then “determine whether to include the additional matters within the Special Counsel’s jurisdiction or assign them elsewhere.”
    Why do you cite this bullshit when you obviously don't know what the fuck you are talking about? The president can only be charged by the house of representatives.

  17. #269 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Port Tack View Post
    They had plenty to indict and would have if they could have.
    Wrong. They could have and didn't. The DoJ letter ruling would only delay the indictment, not eliminate it's possibility.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Superfreak For This Post:

    Earl (06-13-2019)

  19. #270 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,570
    Thanks
    664
    Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,591 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 410 Times in 377 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    No individual is above the law. Not even the President. The DoJ may delay the indictment, but that is all
    The DoJ cannot indict the president either. It is up to the house to indict and bring charges.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-21-2019, 05:44 AM
  2. Trump: Its fake news.... Mueller report.... Nope.
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 229
    Last Post: 04-19-2019, 10:09 AM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2019, 09:06 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-21-2019, 09:07 AM
  5. Mueller to Clear Trump
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 03-26-2018, 09:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •