Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 vote counts

[LV426]

hopefully you realize that it is wrong to prohibit any examination of the process because YOU believe some previous action was not done in good faith..

There was no fraud in the 2020 election, the WI SCOTUS made their ruling 2 years after the 2020 election, and you have been spreading the lies that there was fraud but you don't stand behind what you say here.

You're a phony.

And even throwing WI's votes out, TRUMP STILL LOSES THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

So this isn't about correcting a wrong, this is about you trying to rig the game because you can't win a majority of votes and haven't been able to in 20 years.

[LV426]

anything done in bad faith can be rejected by a majority of the House or the Senate..

Actually, it's not on either of those, and it's on the VP.

And who is the current VP?

So do you really, really think Harris is going to certify a questionable election for Trump?

[LV426]

pass this bill and you will never again be allowed to raise your GOOD FAITH objections........

Don't pass this bill and Kamala Harris can overturn the 2024 election results herself if she doesn't like them.

[LV426]

pass this bill and you will never again be allowed to raise your GOOD FAITH objections........

Sure I can! At the state level.

That's where the objections need to be because State Legislatures certify those results.

By saying Congress should object, you're also saying that you don't think states should certify the results.

So once again, your position is completely contradictory and shortsighted.

Why would you object to election results that a state legislature has already certified? Because you're trying to pull off a coup.

[PostmodernProphet]

OK, so why didn't you go to DC on 1/6 to prevent certification of an "unconstitutional" election?

why do you keep asking the same stupid question?.....

[PostmodernProphet]

Because I'm not a mouth-breathing idiot

liar.....

[PostmodernProphet]

LIAR.

The 4 Conservatives on the WI SCOTUS said drop boxes were unconstitutional IN 2022.

They did not rule that prior to the 2020 election, nor did they say the 2020 election was unconstitutional.

So you don't seem to know what the fuck you're talking about.

lol.....if they were unconstitutional in 2022 how would they have not been unconstitutional in 2020?.....

[LV426]

why do you keep asking the same stupid question?.....

Because you won't answer it.

The reason you won't answer it is because there's no answer to that question that makes you look good coming out the other side. All answers to that question will impeach your character and your sincerity, and you can't win either. So you are either:

- Too much of a coward to show up on 1/6.

OR

- Knew that you were spreading lies and didn't want to end up in jail over them.

Because other than the people in jail or facing trial for 1/6 now, no one else truly believes that the 2020 election was stolen or unconstitutional, not even you.

[evince]

"Possibly"????

Oh ffs, give me a fucking break with this shit already.

The election was secure and the only reason anyone thinks it wasn't is because of Donald Trump's big, fat, fucking LOSER mouth.

And Fox TV lies

[LV426]

liar.....

You're so fucking stupid, you couldn't tell the difference between a pig, a cat, and a human.

[LV426]

lol.....if they were unconstitutional in 2022 how would they have not been unconstitutional in 2020?.....

Because that is not how linear time works.

[PostmodernProphet]

you stepped on my penis!

sorry.....it must have fallen out of your ear.....

[LV426]

sorry.....it must have fallen out of your ear.....

And right on schedule comes the part of the debate where you tank it rather than be held accountable for the lies you were spreading after the 2020 election that led to the Capitol being attacked by Nazis.

You're so full of shit ALL THE TIME, and this "unconstitutional" horseshit is just another instance of you being full of shit.

Because prior to the 2020 election, you never said once that drop boxes were unconstitutional.

You only started saying that after your other excuses fell flat or were laughed out of court.

But none of it answers why you sat here on JPP and ran your big mouth all day on 1/6/21.

[PostmodernProphet]

Actually, it's not on either of those, and it's on the VP.

And who is the current VP?

So do you really, really think Harris is going to certify a questionable election for Trump?

so you are totally unaware of either the current law or the demmycunts proposals......

[PostmodernProphet]

Because you won't answer it.

there are lots of incredibly stupid things you post that we don't respond to.......its for your own best interests.......