Earl (04-18-2019)
"This is actual collusion," Todd said on MSNBC's "Meet The Press." "In case you’re wondering what does collusion look like, it looks like the attorney general’s lawyers briefing the president before Congress or the public.”
Todd went on to claim that impeachment proceedings would have begun if a Democratic president had been involved in such discussions, pointing to Republicans' response to former President Obama's comments on the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's email server.
"Where are all of these House Republicans now that were so up in arms about the president talking about Hillary Clinton’s emails, when what you have here, the attorney general briefing the President of the United States on a case that involves the President of the United States. What is the difference?” Todd asked. "Straight up politics.".......................................
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4...report-this-is
Earl (04-18-2019)
Nomad (04-17-2019)
the next president, Democratic of course, will go after Barr just like he or she will go after the entire Trump crime family
these people all go to prison eventually
cancel2 2022 (04-18-2019)
butt hurt? Its to bad that Chuck Todd and NBC does not hold the office of Attorney General. Laugh My Ass Off. Question? Just when was there ever a grand jury convened in relation to Hillary Clinton with the applicable US CODE laws followed? Another question? Just what is the POTUS obstructing in relation to an investigation that has concluded with the AG already having declared the results? He is obstructing a Congressional Briefing? Again.....laugh my ass off.
Yes...we have no impeachment today. Clearly Chuck Todd is no constitutional scholar......he has never heard of EXEUCTIVE PRIVILEGE and how it applies as per the legal precedent established under the United States v. Nixon. The president has every right to see if he needs to invoke EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE....especially in relation to an investigation in which it is impossible to obstruct or collude.....one that is over with a legal determination already part of the record.
Todd is 100% correct.
This will be a great Dem talking point for the on-going election season.
Watch the pubs running holding their aching asses at the pounding they are going to get as they blame all . . . on . . . Hillary.
cancel2 2022 (04-18-2019)
jimmymccready (04-17-2019)
Indeed....they can explain just how they spent 30 million dollars and investigated for 2 years and still could not prove the propaganda they lied about for those 2 years. Just where is that evidence and why did Mueller not apply it....as Swallowswell and Shitforbrains declared....we have absolute evidence of collusion. What? Are they saving it for election day? It will be great press for someone. Beat that dead horse.
PostmodernProphet (04-18-2019)
btw if Trump suddenly flies to Moscow to meet with Putin, map out your neighborhood bomb shelter
cancel2 2022 (04-18-2019)
Bookmarks