More Trump Treason-US allies to no longer share critical Intel after declassification

[domer76]

Why are his financial records anyone's business? Will you make yours public? I sure as hell won't make mine public.

If Mueller found all those obstructions, why didn't he bring charges? Hell, he couldn't even get a grand jury to indict.

Because, dumbfuck, there is credible evidence that he has committed bank fraud, insurance fraud and has continued to violate the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

Dumbfuck, Mueller followed DOJ rules that you can’t indict a sitting President. How many times does that have to be explained to you l?

Fucking illiterate moron

[RB 60]

Because, dumbfuck, there is credible evidence that he has committed bank fraud, insurance fraud and has continued to violate the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

Dumbfuck, Mueller followed DOJ rules that you can’t indict a sitting President. How many times does that have to be explained to you l?

Fucking illiterate moron

Then why didn't the IRS or an AG go after him.

Mueller could have recommended impeachment, Clinton was impeached.

Does the constant infantile name calling make you feel like you're something above others? Face the fact that you're inferior to most here.

[domer76]

Then why didn't the IRS or an AG go after him.

Mueller could have recommended impeachment, Clinton was impeached.

Does the constant infantile name calling make you feel like you're something above others? Face the fact that you're inferior to most here.

I don't know the answer to that. Just release the records and we'll see, huh?

Perhaps Mueller COULD HAVE. Quit diverting.

Calling a spade and spade, moron.

Inferior to you blind Trumptards? Priceless!

I don't need to feel superior to anyone, idiot. I just point out the lies, distortions and utter bullshit.

Now, go wipe the Trump jizz off your chin.

[Grokmaster]

Because, dumbfuck, there is credible evidence that he has committed bank fraud, insurance fraud and has continued to violate the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

Dumbfuck, Mueller followed DOJ rules that you can’t indict a sitting President. How many times does that have to be explained to you l?

Fucking illiterate moron

Says WHO? The MORON DUNCEOCRATS?


The IRS and ENTIRE TAX ASSESSOR OFFICE of NEW YORK CITY don't think so, they know a helluva lot more about than the Dunce-o-crat House Numbskulls...and CONGRESS DOES NOT GET TO GO "LOOKING FOR 'POSSIBLE' CRIMES"....


"While it is true that IRS Code 6103(f) appears to give the committee the power to get tax returns, the statute must be exercised in a way consistent with Congress’ constitutional authority. The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571











Mueller COULD HAVE INDICTED EVRERYONE WHO WAS A PART OF ANY OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, besides the POTUS.


HE DID NOT.

Why do you think THAT WAS DIPSHIT?

[dukkha]

Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

Mueler had nothing, but he knew if he left it unresolved, the Dems could us that mentions as a political cudgel.
Mueller is a partisan hack

[domer76]

Says WHO? The MORON DUNCEOCRATS?


The IRS and ENTIRE TAX ASSESSOR OFFICE of NEW YORK CITY don't think so, they know a helluva lot more about than the Dunce-o-crat House Numbskulls...and CONGRESS DOES NOT GET TO GO "LOOKING FOR 'POSSIBLE' CRIMES"....


"While it is true that IRS Code 6103(f) appears to give the committee the power to get tax returns, the statute must be exercised in a way consistent with Congress’ constitutional authority. The Supreme Court has said Congress has broad authority to conduct inquiries but that its authority is not unlimited. In the 1881 case Kilbourn v. Thompson, the Supreme Court held that Congress can’t use its powers to delve into someone’s private financial matters unless there is a proper legislative purpose. In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571











Mueller COULD HAVE INDICTED EVRERYONE WHO WAS A PART OF ANY OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, besides the POTUS.


HE DID NOT.

Why do you think THAT WAS DIPSHIT?

Wrong again on the indictments, moron. You saying it over and over doesn't make it true. You know the DOJ rule about indicting a sitting President. He was following that. Just ask the black out rapist, Kavanaugh about that.

1) on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request,

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103

The statue is consistent with Congress' Constitutional authority. That's a "legitimate task of the Congress". The power of oversight and investigating possible impeachable offenses. So far, two judges concur.

Dismissed.

[dukkha]

I don't know the answer to that. Just release the records and we'll see, huh?

go fish

[dukkha]

Because, dumbfuck, there is credible evidence that he has committed bank fraud, insurance fraud and has continued to violate the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

Dumbfuck, Mueller followed DOJ rules that you can’t indict a sitting President. How many times does that have to be explained to you l?

Fucking illiterate moron

the fact you are reduced to Emoluments - even though the money is not gifts- -shows you got nothing.

There is no "credible evidence" and Congress cant start a criminal investigation to find one.

You can impeach -go for it!

[Adolf_Twitler]

[dukkha]

The statue is consistent with Congress' Constitutional authority. That's a "legitimate task of the Congress". The power of oversight and investigating possible impeachable offenses. So far, two judges concur.

Dismissed.

so go impeach or go home. you can't solely look for impeachable offenses outside impeachment hearings

[Grokmaster]

I don't know the answer to that. Just release the records and we'll see, huh?

Perhaps Mueller COULD HAVE. Quit diverting.

Calling a spade and spade, moron.

Inferior to you blind Trumptards? Priceless!

I don't need to feel superior to anyone, idiot. I just point out the lies, distortions and utter bullshit.

Now, go wipe the Trump jizz off your chin.

What "RECORDS" ? Mueller released his report.

[Grokmaster]

Wrong again on the indictments, moron. You saying it over and over doesn't make it true. You know the DOJ rule about indicting a sitting President. He was following that. Just ask the black out rapist, Kavanaugh about that.

1) on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request,

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103

The statue is consistent with Congress' Constitutional authority. That's a "legitimate task of the Congress". The power of oversight and investigating possible impeachable offenses. So far, two judges concur.

Dismissed.

More of your idiocy, stupidfuck.


CAN'T FUCKING READ...or just lack comprehension ability?



WHAT I SAID:


Mueller COULD HAVE INDICTED EVRERYONE WHO WAS A PART OF ANY OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, besides the POTUS .

There is NO RULE regarding anyone else in the administration. Why didn't Mueller INDICT ANY OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED in the "OBSTRUCTION" you keep deluding about?


Fucking numbskull.


And ALSO AS I SAID, Congress does NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEMAND PERSONAL FINANCIAL DATA FOR A FISHING EXPEDITION:

In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes."

https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...returns-226571


Stupidass dunce...can't fucking read.



If the Dunce-o-crats are "seeking the Truth" WHY ARE THEY SHITTING THEIR DIAPERS OVER THE DECLASSIFICATIOIN of the RUSSIA PROBE DOCS???

[domer76]

go fish

Oversight and impeachment inquiry. Proper power of Congress.

Deny all you want, but Trump is hiding his financial records for some reason. And since he has no principles, it's not that reason, is it?

Emoluments, pal.

[Grokmaster]

Oversight and impeachment inquiry. Proper power of Congress.

Deny all you want, but Trump is hiding his financial records for some reason. And since he has no principles, it's not that reason, is it?

Emoluments, pal.

Congress DOEDS NOT HAVE "OVERSIGTHT" of the POTUS.

THEY HAVE TO FILE AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY...and CITE THE ALLEGED CRIMES...they are too terrified to do so...WHY?


Makeup some MORE BULLSHIT that is not in the Constitution.

[domer76]

the fact you are reduced to Emoluments - even though the money is not gifts- -shows you got nothing.

There is no "credible evidence" and Congress cant start a criminal investigation to find one.

You can impeach -go for it!

Here's the text, you fucking moron.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Emolument (def) - a salary, fee, or profit from employment or office.

Why don't you idiots do your homework for once?