Moscow; ' Chemical attack ' in Syria is FAKE NEWS

[moon]

Moscow calls ‘chemical attack’ in Douma ‘fake news,’ warns against Syrian intervention


Reports of an alleged gas attack in the Syrian town of Douma are ‘fake news’ aimed at justifying potential strikes against Syria, Moscow said. It warned of “dire consequences” in the event of any military interference.
The Russian Foreign Ministry denounced the latest reports about a chemical attack that allegedly affected dozens of civilians in the militant-controlled town of Douma. It said the reports were another example of a “continuous series of fake news about the use of chlorine and other chemical agents by the government forces.”


The ministry pointed out that the source of the reports was the notorious “civil defense” group, the White Helmets, which has been repeatedly accused of having ties to terrorists, as well as other groups based in the US and UK.

https://www.rt.com/news/423524-douma...k-fake-moscow/

Assad, along with the Russians, the Iranians and the Lebanese- has won the ' civil war ' in Syrian. They are mopping up around Damascus. There is no reason for him to use any proscribed munitions. It would be stupid- and he's not.
We'd better find out who IS- or a lot of people are going to die.

[kudzu]

Assad, along with the Russians, the Iranians and the Lebanese- has won the ' civil war ' in Syrian. They are mopping up around Damascus. There is no reason for him to use any proscribed munitions. It would be stupid- and he's not.
We'd better find out who IS- or a lot of people are going to die.

That's the kind of lies you get from Russia Today.

[moon]

That's the kind of lies you get from Russia Today.

If you cannot see with both eyes you are a propaganda sponge.

[evince]

That's the kind of lies you get from Russia Today.

and It sounds so much like a trumpy lie

[anatta]

The reason Assad used barrel bombs was lack of alternative munitions- has that changed?

[Irish Exit]

Assad, along with the Russians, the Iranians and the Lebanese- has won the ' civil war ' in Syrian. They are mopping up around Damascus. There is no reason for him to use any proscribed munitions. It would be stupid- and he's not.
We'd better find out who IS- or a lot of people are going to die.

I haven't seen anything that supports the allegation, not that I would be totally shocked if they did use it. I just need some strong evidence before deciding one way or the other given the histories of so many sides there

[blackascoal]

and It sounds so much like a trumpy lie

Moon is a Trump / Putin propagandist and mouthpiece,

Don't be fooled by her claims of caring for the Palestinians.

[moon]

You're a bunch of lemmings. Only fools would believe that this ' attack '- if indeed it took place- is anything but a BLACK OP AIMED AT KEEPING THE USA IN SYRIA

‘Syria gases own people just as Trump mulls withdrawal?’ Journalists question Douma ‘chem attack’

https://www.rt.com/news/423530-syria...ming-reaction/

They fooled you with Iraqi WMD- they fooled you with a Libyan ' No fly zone '- and they're quite certain that fools can be fooled repeatedly.

Meanwhile- who is looking at the ' Israeli' civilian-slaughtering atrocities ? Eh ? Bunch o' mugs.

[moon]

Moon is a Trump / Putin propagandist and mouthpiece,

Don't be fooled by her claims of caring for the Palestinians.

You're looking dumber every day, pal.

[anatta]

You're a bunch of lemmings. Only fools would believe that this ' attack '- if indeed it took place- is anything but a BLACK OP AIMED AT KEEPING THE USA IN SYRIA



They fooled you with Iraqi WMD- they fooled you with a Libyan ' No fly zone '- and they're quite certain that fools can be fooled repeatedly.

Meanwhile- who is looking at the ' Israeli' civilian-slaughtering atrocities ? Eh ? Bunch o' mugs.

possible. and I never underestimate the call for humanitarian intervention -even though it's bogus.

More likely is more airstrikes, but that would also increase the call to "check Russia and Iran"

forget that noise.. get out now

[moon]

I haven't seen anything that supports the allegation, not that I would be totally shocked if they did use it. I just need some strong evidence before deciding one way or the other given the histories of so many sides there

Just like the Salisbury ..er...' nerve gas attack'- it doesn't pass the logic test to shriek ' Assad ! ' any more than it did to blame Russia.
There is NO ADVANTAGE.

[cancel2 2022]

You're looking dumber every day, pal.

So apart from being a blubbering vagina, you also have one between your legs, is that right?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

[Irish Exit]

Just like the Salisbury ..er...' nerve gas attack'- it doesn't pass the logic test to shriek ' Assad ! ' and more than it did to blame Russia.
There is NO ADVANTAGE.

I agree with that context which heightens my need to see strong evidence with the allegation before deciding if I believe it.

[moon]

possible. and I never underestimate the call for humanitarian intervention -even though it's bogus.

More likely is more airstrikes, but that would also increase the call to "check Russia and Iran"

forget that noise.. get out now

' Chemical attacks ' will mysteriously cease should the US start to comply with international law and leave.
The Russians, Iranians and Lebanese are in Syria- LEGALLY.

[moon]

So apart from being a blubbering vagina, you also have one between your legs, is that right?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

Trollshit.