several Clinton donors are jurist in Sussman trial

[dukkha]

This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors

[dukkha]

Baker testimony blew up Sussmans claims -yet he'll walk because of a tainted jury

Must be nice to be a DC bigwig.you do what you want and you never pay the piper

[dukkha]

Baker wouldn't have met with Sussmann if he admitted he was representing Clinton
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...enting-clinton

[evince]

Democrats are allowed on juries fuck lips

[Poor Richard Saunders]

This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors

Neither Clinton or Trump are on trial. Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI.
All this frother BS about Clinton people being on the jury is just an attempt to hide the fact that Durham has no case.

[RB 60]

Democrats are allowed on juries fuck lips

Not when they have opinions or ties to the case they don't. And it works both ways.

That said, I don't trust the DOJ. Both prosecution and defense have the same right to pick or reject each member of the jury. They must both agree on each of the number of jurors needed and alternates.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Baker testimony blew up Sussmans claims -yet he'll walk because of a tainted jury

Must be nice to be a DC bigwig.you do what you want and you never pay the piper

The defense got to ask Baker about all the other times he testified differently while under oath. Somehow I don't think Baker is a reliable witness since he now remembers clearly something that happened over 6 years ago but doesn't remember what happened the day after when they talked on the phone.

Baker was also under investigation by Durham so has every reason to lie for Durham to prevent being prosecuted. It's amazing how you don't know any of the facts in this case.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Not when they have opinions or ties to the case they don't. And it works both ways.

That said, I don't trust the DOJ. Both prosecution and defense have the same right to pick or reject each member of the jury. They must both agree on each of the number of jurors needed and alternates.

Nope. That's not the way it works. They both don't have to agree on jurors. If the juror says they can be impartial and the judge sees no reason to not believe them then neither side can remove them unless they use one of their limited peremptory strikes.

[RB 60]

Nope. That's not the way it works. They both don't have to agree on jurors. If the juror says they can be impartial and the judge sees no reason to not believe them then neither side can remove them unless they use one of their limited peremptory strikes.

That's exactly how it works. I was the foreman on a Federal case some years ago.

[evince]

Not when they have opinions or ties to the case they don't. And it works both ways.

That said, I don't trust the DOJ. Both prosecution and defense have the same right to pick or reject each member of the jury. They must both agree on each of the number of jurors needed and alternates.

You hate everything American


RUBEpublican

[dukkha]

Neither Clinton or Trump are on trial. Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI.
All this frother BS about Clinton people being on the jury is just an attempt to hide the fact that Durham has no case.

you can say that -although bakers testimony blew that up
. But it doesn't mean judge should accept a DONOR to DEMs juror. thats an advocate juror

[Concart]

I'm pretty sure political contributions don't disqualify you for jury duty. Anatta continues to be one of the whiniest, lamest, dumbest posters here.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

That's exactly how it works. I was the foreman on a Federal case some years ago.

As a foreman on the jury you weren't privy to the process that every juror was selected.

The transcript from the day of jury selection clearly shows the judge asking jurors if they can be impartial, and after they say, "yes." telling the prosecution they can use a peremptory strike if they don't like the juror.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you can say that -although bakers testimony blew that up
. But it doesn't mean judge should accept a DONOR to DEMs juror. thats an advocate juror

The judge also accepted a donor to GOP so your argument is Bullshit.

[dukkha]

The defense got to ask Baker about all the other times he testified differently while under oath. Somehow I don't think Baker is a reliable witness since he now remembers clearly something that happened over 6 years ago but doesn't remember what happened the day after when they talked on the phone.

Baker was also under investigation by Durham so has every reason to lie for Durham to prevent being prosecuted. It's amazing how you don't know any of the facts in this case.

True Baker is a crooked Swamp Critter
But the text backs him up as well.. I dont study the minutia - no point.
Durham sniffed out Clinton bought and paid for the Steele dossier and misrepresented it to the FBI while Nellie Ohr was backdooring it

Then the whole fake FISA and a special counsel appointed while page testified they had no evidence of Russian collusion
I ertainly dont expect any justice - this is the Swamp. More light on the cockroaches is the most I expect