Fauci finally admits therapeutics work

[Darth Omar]

Shut up LOL We're fine.

http://ww11.doh.state.fl.us/comm/_pa...ata_latest.pdf (graph on page 8)

But the cases!! lol

Yeah, Fauci is about a year behind. I wonder how many Covid victims died needlessly over the therapeutic disinformation put out by Fauci and the medical bureaucracy?

[Stretch]

Merck Spends Big on COVID-19 Candidate, But Ignores Its Own Ivermectin Product
TrialSite Staff February 14, 2021
https://trialsitenews.com/merck-spen...ectin-product/

_____________________


As we all know, Merck was involved in the development of a competing drug and had 356 million reasons to throw its own cheap, unprofitable Ivermectin under the bus. Furthermore, the US government was likewise involved in a significant financial conflict of interest with Merck.
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=67179

[Stretch]

Horowitz: Merck rejects ivermectin for COVID treatment after getting $1.2 billion gov’t contract for expensive, unproven drug
Op-ed
Daniel Horowitz
June 21, 2021

For those trying to follow the science and the law, it's been impossible to ascertain a modicum of consistency in the government's COVID response. However, when you follow the money, everything officials are doing (as well as what they are not doing) makes perfect sense.

Don't miss out on content from Dave Rubin free of big tech censorship. Listen to The Rubin Report now.

The same government that has the power to use COVID to shut down our lives and our breathing also has the power to determine to which pharmaceutical company it will send billions of taxpayer dollars, a decision that is governed 100% by money and politics, not by sound medicine. We already understand why the vaccine companies have been funding a war against cheap, effective therapeutics such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, but many have wondered why Merck would oppose a drug that the company itself has made for many years.

On Feb. 4, Merck came out with a shocking statement warning against the use of ivermectin to treat COVID. The statement claimed there was "no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies" and that there was "a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies."

This was quite a bizarre assertion given that 59 studies, including 30 randomized controlled trials, have shown the drug to be extremely effective at all stages of the virus. The statement regarding safety concerns was even more ludicrous given that nearly 4 billion doses of this drug have been dispensed for parasitic ailments, it won the Nobel prize, and it is listed among the WHO's most essential drugs. There is no logical reason why someone would somehow begin experiencing dangerous side effects if he happens to use ivermectin for COVID instead of for scabies or river blindness.

Nonetheless, Merck's statement served as a strong blow to the use of ivermectin, because Merck was a large dispenser of this drug. After all, why would the company dump on its own drug?

"This mechanism is to disrupt the SARS-COV-2 virus' RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) enzyme," said Dr. Mobeen, who runs a medical education center. "Copying this mechanism will give Merck a way to earn from an existing cheap drug's action by relabeling it; however, I believe that molnupiravir will continue to be less effective as studies show that ivermectin has more mechanisms to disrupt the SARS-COV-2 replication and spread. Hence, ivermectin will continue to be a superior choice over molnupirivir or other RdRp disrupters."
Article continues at https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horow...-unproven-drug

[Phantasmal]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special...clusives/92323


Now, after reading about Molnupiravir, do you think the two drugs sound the same? They certainly don’t to me.

[Old Trapper]

[B][SIZE=3]About damn time. Most of us knew that a year ago. One was Ivermectin.

One thing is certain about liars like you, you are easily proven to be liars. Of course, since denial is a way of life in your low IQ world, well..... That is why you bitch, and whine, about a free vaccine, yet are willing to take a pill that is approved to kill parasites, not viruses:

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

[Old Trapper]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special...clusives/92323


Now, after reading about Molnupiravir, do you think the two drugs sound the same? They certainly don’t to me.

Did you see this one?

"A team of researchers in Singapore has found a combination of antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs that can be used to treat Covid-19 patients with mild to moderate disease.

The team from National University of Singapore (NUS) found that a combination of antiviral molnupiravir and anti-inflammatory baricitinib can be effective against the Beta and Delta variants of the virus, the Strait Times reported.

The combination could strongly inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 virus in laboratory tests, making it suitable for further clinical evaluation, Professor Dean Ho, director of the NUS's Institute for Digital Medicine, was quoted as saying.

"... we are looking for combination therapies that can eventually be given to patients with mild illness who are recovering at home, or in community care facilities," Ho said.

Experts from the National Centre for Infectious Diseases, NUS Medicine and the National University Hospital (NUH) tested 12 drugs -- which included a range of antivirals and cancer drugs.

The molnupiravir-baricitinib combination was identified for possible treatment, the report said.

However, there is no data yet from clinical trials that show the drug combination is effective in all phases of Covid-19 disease, Dr Louis Chai, a senior consultant at the NUH Division of Infectious Diseases, was quoted as saying."

https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/wor...ts-find-723863

[Stretch]

Scientists hope they’re closing in on a cure for COVID-19
Health Jun 1, 2021 4:26 PM EDT

By repurposing an existing medicine and using already-developed compounds, both Garcia-Sastre and Hazuda shaved precious time off the drug development process. Piggybacking off already identified candidates also helps sidestep some of the cost spent on basic research.

“That’s particularly useful because you don’t have to reinvent the wheel in a way,” Sampat said.

Remdesivir, so far the only antiviral approved for COVID-19, benefited from the same leg up. Developed nearly a decade ago and shown effective against other coronaviruses including Ebola, SARS and MERS, it was fast tracked for use against COVID-19 and greenlit by the FDA in October 2020.

Another existing drug, ivermectin, may also have potential against SARS-CoV-2. A May meta-analysis suggests it could speed recovery and reduce mortality from COVID-19. The idea is controversial; some experts are unconvinced while proponents are eager to put it to use as a cheap, effective treatment. The anti-parasitic, developed by Merck in the 1980s, is no longer under patent. The company has contended there is not sufficient evidence for its use against COVID. Merck declined to respond to PBS NewHour’s request for comment.
Article continues at https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/...ir-plitidepsin

[Darth Omar]

This bunch really puts the mixed in messaging, don’t they lol?

Didn’t the Mean Tweeter say something about Ivermectin?

[Darth Omar]

Only him talks about it.

BTW, this is a perfect facepalm for the OP.

The facepalm is over Fauci ‘getting around’, finally, to talking about something like Ivermectin.

[Nordberg]

Stretch is wrong. The pill does not exist yet. He is talking about making one. They put 3.2 billion into research. https://www.clickorlando.com/news/po...-for-covid-19/ Some research is started.

[AProudLefty]

The facepalm is over Fauci ‘getting around’, finally, to talking about something like Ivermectin.

Is anybody talking about it except him?

[Stretch]

But the cases!! lol

Yeah, Fauci is about a year behind. I wonder how many Covid victims died needlessly over the therapeutic disinformation put out by Fauci and the medical bureaucracy?

Too many. Ivermectin is FDA approved for use in people and animals. Lot of people out here in horse country just pick it up at Tractor Supply. I just love Ocala, LOL.

[Stretch]

One thing is certain about liars like you, you are easily proven to be liars. Of course, since denial is a way of life in your low IQ world, well..... That is why you bitch, and whine, about a free vaccine, yet are willing to take a pill that is approved to kill parasites, not viruses:

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

LOL!!!!!!!! Yup. FDA-approved for humans and animals for years.

[Stretch]

One thing is certain about liars like you, you are easily proven to be liars. Of course, since denial is a way of life in your low IQ world, well..... That is why you bitch, and whine, about a free vaccine, yet are willing to take a pill that is approved to kill parasites, not viruses:

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

Nooooooo. The Molnupiravir is the unproven drug that Dr. Death is so "happy" about.

[Stretch]

The facepalm is over Fauci ‘getting around’, finally, to talking about something like Ivermectin.

LOL. I know, right? Did you listen to him speaking? He actually said that he was "happy" about it.
Happy about all the rest of us and Trump being right though? HAH! We'll see.