Mutilating children?
Wonder what's going on here? The APA hasn't explained why they did this.
"Twitter users called attention to the fact that the study’s abstract with “strong” conclusion is not under a paywall, though the correction itself is.
“The original abstract remains public yet the letters of dissent and the correction is paywalled...”
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
Probably for the same reason the NY Times runs hundreds of front-page stories smearing, for example, the Duke Lacrosse team and then quietly runs their admission that they knew for an entire year that the team was innocent WHILE they lied about them...on page 27b a single time. Humiliation coupled with dishonest corruption and bias.
Bookmarks