Members banned from this thread: Cypress, FUCK THE POLICE, Jarod, Mott the Hoople, blackascoal, midcan5, Cancel 2018. 3, evince, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Phantasmal, Rune, moon, iolo, Text Drivers are Killers, Bill, domer76, sear, archives, Nomad, Micawber, TTQ64, zymurgy, crowonapost, Tomas Fabregas, J.kennedy, mak2, Irish Exit, Mason Michaels, JqYaqui, ThatOwlWoman, Tranquillus in Exile, katzgar, Joe Capitalist, Jade Dragon, Nordberg, Crazy Cat Lady, Bourbon, Frank Apisa, TrippyHippy, Cancel 2019.1, Gotcha68, Centerleftfl, kudzu, volsrock, PoliTalker, rjhenn, Guno צְבִי, Rigby5, jbander1, Fentoine Lum, Jack, Aarr!, magellan, rhym3pays, LV426, Old Trapper, jacka, Lesh and NiftyNiblick |
From the DEMOCRAT-infested liberal media
From chain e-mails
From online gossip
From reading other liberals' lies on JPP
They do seem to make assumptions based on race which aren't accurate, don't they?
I heard that Twitter, Facebook and YouTube are "shadow-banning" major conservatives and that there may be an investigation.
If it's found that Twitter, YouTube and Facebook are intentionally favoring leftists and suppressing conservatives they could be forced to registers as PACs, I think.
Rat Robbersson (07-27-2018)
Stay tuned as your stomach churns from watching the cfm/legion bromance.
sounds of silence!
Controlled Opposition (07-27-2018)
Twitter shares drop 16 percent after reporting declining monthly active users
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/27/twitter-earnings-q2-2018.html
I don't recall citing any World News Bureau.
Liberal site: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/..._n_215692.html
Real pic:
The Gray Lady feels the agony of political defeat — in her reputation and in her wallet.
After taking a beating almost as brutal as Hillary Clinton’s, the New York Times made an extraordinary appeal. The publisher’s letter to subscribers was part apology and part defense of its campaign coverage.
Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. admitted the paper failed, while insisting his staff had “reported on both candidates fairly,” he also vowed that the paper would “rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor.”
Times reporters saw Trump “as an abnormal and potentially dangerous candidate” and thus couldn’t be even-handed.
That wasn’t one reporter talking — it was policy.
The standards, developed over decades to force reporters and editors to be fair and to build public trust, were effectively eliminated as too restrictive for the Trump phenomenon.
The man responsible for that rash decision, top editor Dean Baquet, later said that “nailed” his thinking. Baquet also said of the "struggle" for fairness, “I think that Trump has ended that struggle.”
Mocked even by liberals for its bias, the paper is also apparently bleeding readers — and money.
https://nypost.com/2016/11/11/new-york-times-we-blew-it-on-trump/
Bookmarks