Truth Detector (12-22-2017)
Truth Detector (12-22-2017)
Truth Detector (12-22-2017)
Truth Detector (12-22-2017)
C'MON MAN!!!!
The responses by Steele as referenced were made in a "London courtroom". That's in England, Soymad. Try reading the OP before you comment.
Here's another article about the case:
"...he and his company, Orbis Business Intelligence Limited, have filed a defence in the high court of justice in London, in a defamation case brought by Aleksej Gubarev, a Russian venture capitalist and owner of a global computer technology company, XBT, and a Dallas-based subsidiary Webzilla."
If you have trouble understanding where "the high court of justice in London" is, let me know.
Christopher Steele is not a DEMOCRAT. He's British, and his statement is a matter of record in court documents as reported in the British press by the left-leaning Guardian back in April:
A statement by Steele’s defence lawyers, endorsed by the former MI6 agent, said Orbis was hired between June and November last year by Fusion GPS, a Washington-based research consultancy to look into Trump’s links with Russia.
In that period, Steele produced 16 memoranda citing mostly Russian sources as describing a web of alleged contacts and collusion between Trump aides and Russian intelligence or other Kremlin representatives.
The document said that he passed the memos to Fusion on the understanding that Fusion would not disclose the material to any third parties without the approval of Steele and Orbis. They did agree to Fusion providing a copy to Senator John McCain after the veteran Republican had been told about the existence of Steele’s research by Sir Andrew Wood, a former UK ambassador to Moscow and an Orbis associate, at a conference in Canada on 8 November.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/apr/28/trump-russia-intelligence-uk-government-m16-kremlin
Poor Zappacrite.
Now, watch him dance.
I command you to dance, Zappacrite.
Dance!
Hey MORON.... which country's legal system is OURS modelled after????
It works the same way in England as it does here. Wealthy individuals and organizations with unlimited resources can use the legal system to beat up the little guy.
So, the point still stands.
Try reading a history book before YOU comment.
C'MON MAN!!!!
Talk about naive, the case is in the UK you flipping moron.
Further, in this country it is highly possible for him to get attorney fees if he wins. Also, with such a high profile case if you don't think someone or some org like the ACLU would take the case at no charge, YOU are the naive one
Basically, your unsubstantiated claim is that he is now telling a different "truth" solely because of money. You are not only naive, but highly ignorant.
Truth Detector (12-22-2017)
Read my above post re: UK legal system vs US.
The rest of your blather is just oversimplification. In civil matters, the truth is rarely as cut & dried as in criminal cases, so "proving" one's case is not always as easy as you and your Trumpsucker buddy are trying to make it appear.
If the guy has limited resources compared to accusers, he has to be extremely careful, possibly even backing off his claims out of fear of being financially ruined.
And as for that nonsense about the ACLU, they would only get involved if it was a civil rights case.
You highly ignorant fuck.
C'MON MAN!!!!
Rune (12-23-2017)
Nomad (12-22-2017), zappasguitar (12-22-2017)
Last night "legal eagle" Soymad thought Trump was a party to the case, apparently.
Libel law in the UK is vastly different, despite Soymad's ignorant assertion.
"English laws are much more favorable for someone looking to protect their reputation," says Jenny Afia, a lawyer in London who often represents people making libel and privacy claims. "Crooks and brigands from around the world come here to launder their reputations, where they couldn't get exculpation in either their home country or indeed in the United States of America," says Mark Stephens, a London lawyer who often represents media companies in these cases.
https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/03/21/394273902/on-libel-and-the-law-u-s-and-u-k-go-separate-ways
I enjoy Soymad's public humiliation.
Rune (12-23-2017)
Bookmarks