Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    If the samples tested were as old as atheists claim, there would be no C14 at all. The fact that they found measurable amounts proves that they are not nearly as old as they believe.
    The half-life of C14 is 5730 years, but remember this is first order decay. So after 5730 years there is 50% left and after another 5730 years there is 25% left, and so on.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProggyStyle View Post
    I don't think you have any evidence, I think you have bullshit.
    Why won't you look at the evidence? You dismissed it without even looking at it? Know what that makes you? A FOOL!

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    Why won't you look at the evidence? You dismissed it without even looking at it? Know what that makes you? A FOOL!
    I've read many of your links. I learn from experience.

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    The half-life of C14 is 5730 years, but remember this is first order decay. So after 5730 years there is 50% left and after another 5730 years there is 25% left, and so on.
    After 40,000 years, that would leave about .30 percent left. Easily enough to be tested. And I'll remind you that fossils millions of years old would contain exactly none. Zip. Zero. Nada.

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    After 40,000 years, that would leave .39 percent left. Easily enough to be tested. And I'll remind you that fossils millions of years old would contain exactly none. Zip. Zero. Nada.
    You are about 100 years behind the times.. and even 100 years ago scientists knew that dinosaurs did not roam the earth with mankind and the creation story was allegory.

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProggyStyle View Post
    I've read many of your links. I learn from experience.
    Make all the excuses you want. It doesn't change the fact that you refuse to even look at the evidence. That being the case, what are you doing here?

  7. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    Make all the excuses you want. It doesn't change the fact that you refuse to even look at the evidence. That being the case, what are you doing here?
    You're basically Evince.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Lightbringer For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-09-2018)

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProggyStyle View Post
    You're basically Evince.
    And you refuse to engage in honest debate. Look at the evidence and try to refute it. You cant.

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    And you refuse to engage in honest debate. Look at the evidence and try to refute it. You cant.
    Stop being stupid and I'll stop treating you like you're stupid.

  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProggyStyle View Post
    Stop being stupid and I'll stop treating you like you're stupid.
    Speaking of stupid, what would you call someone who comments on something they have refused to even read?

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    And you refuse to engage in honest debate. Look at the evidence and try to refute it. You cant.
    You can't engage in honest debate with someone who believes the earth is young and dinosaurs lived alongside of men.. You become a huge waste of time.

  13. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    23,532
    Thanks
    3,066
    Thanked 9,766 Times in 7,268 Posts
    Groans
    49
    Groaned 1,060 Times in 1,005 Posts

    Default

    Oh Your God, Grugore (to coin an expression)!

    You're not going to quit, are you?
    There is obviously no end to your sketchy sources publishing inane papers and articles!

    I guess what makes you funny is that you don't even realize the laughing stock you make of yourself.

    I love the comical smugness with which you think you've finally backed us into a corner with THE TRUTH!!!!


    Look, Grugore,
    I understand that you didn't draw your own blueprint.
    I don't imagine that anybody WANTS to be a fucking idiot.

    In fact, I consider it a slight, personal character flaw on my own part
    that I wish you'd disappear.

    I prefer my comedy from professionals.

  14. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    Speaking of stupid, what would you call someone who comments on something they have refused to even read?
    Your beliefs reject science and education in favor of religious mythology that has always been understood as didactic literature. I am sorry for you.

    Since the mid-20th century, young Earth creationists—starting with Henry Morris (1918–2006)—have devised and promoted a pseudoscientific explanation called "creation science" as a basis for a religious belief in a supernatural, geologically recent creation.

    Contemporary YEC movements arose in protest to the scientific consensus, established by numerous scientific disciplines, which demonstrates that the age of the universe is around 13.8 billion years, the formation of the Earth happened around 4.5 billion years ago, and the first appearance of life on Earth was at least 3.5 billion years ago.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-22-2017, 01:44 PM
  2. Replies: 147
    Last Post: 11-16-2017, 01:21 PM
  3. Roy Moore: I may have dated teenagers
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 250
    Last Post: 11-13-2017, 03:24 PM
  4. Grind's Dinosaur
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-24-2009, 09:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •