Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old

    Here is the truth, if you can handle it. I expect most of you cant.
    http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html
    Do yourselves a favor and read the entire article before commenting. It will save you some embarrassment. If you have a short attention span and can't read the whole article, it would be best if you remain silent.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,209
    Thanks
    35,760
    Thanked 50,711 Times in 27,343 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old !
    No real scientist attempts to date dinosaur bones with Carbon 14.
    No real scientist even attempts to date the bones themselves, the material that is actually dated is the rock material surrounding the fossils.
    Based on a quick internet search, there is no evidence a "Dr. Thomas Seiler" has ever published any peer reviewed papers,
    no evidence he is employed at a reputable research institution or university,
    there is no record of his education or qualifications.
    A real scientist has a publication track record, and has reputable professional associations and credentials which should be easily found with google.

    All signs point to fake news, or somebody flat out lying their ass off.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    kudzu (11-09-2018), Phantasmal (11-09-2018)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    No real scientist attempts to date dinosaur bones with Carbon 14.
    No real scientist even attempts to date the bones themselves, the material that is actually dated is the rock material surrounding the fossils.
    Based on a quick internet search, there is no evidence a "Dr. Thomas Seiler" has ever published any peer reviewed papers,
    no evidence he is employed at a reputable research institution or university,
    there is no record of his education or qualifications.
    A real scientist has a publication track record, and has reputable professional associations and credentials which should be easily found with google.

    All signs point to fake news, or somebody flat out lying their ass off.


    There is so much evidence from East Africa across to Western Arabian Peninsula dating back 100,000 years. Very cool.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to kudzu For This Post:

    Phantasmal (11-09-2018)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,209
    Thanks
    35,760
    Thanked 50,711 Times in 27,343 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kudzu View Post
    There is so much evidence from East Africa across to Western Arabian Peninsula dating back 100,000 years. Very cool.
    I would love to find living or recent dinosaurs, but the evidence is overwhelming that they were taken out at the K-T extinction event.

    My current fascination is with human evolution. Apparently, modern humans have 1 to 3 percent neaderthal DNA, so our Neanderthal and possibly homo erectus hominid ancestors live on...in our DNA!

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Phantasmal (11-09-2018)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    Here is the truth, if you can handle it. I expect most of you cant.
    http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html
    Do yourselves a favor and read the entire article before commenting. It will save you some embarrassment. If you have a short attention span and can't read the whole article, it would be best if you remain silent.
    No, I'm not reading the article and I'm calling bullshit on it.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Lightbringer For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-09-2018)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProggyStyle View Post
    No, I'm not reading the article and I'm calling bullshit on it.
    Not only are you lazy, you are dishonest. The testing was performed on many different samples and standard procedures were employed to avoid contamination. I thought you people worshipped science. And yet here you are, refusing to look at scientific evidence because it doesn't fit your atheist narrative. How pathetic. Sucks to be you.

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Carbon 14 dating is very accurate for carboniferous samples up to about 4,000 years ago. This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age and provenance to determine the C12/C14 ratio at that period of time. Scientists have attempted to go back further back using tree ring data but this has proved problematic and unreliable.Carbon dating fossils is not possible as there is little or no carboniferous material and there is nothing to use as a reference anyway.

    So yeh it's bullshit, pure and simple.
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 11-09-2018 at 02:02 PM.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Rune (11-12-2018)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    I can believe it.

    Dinosaurs still exist!

    Crocs still crawl the Earth!

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProggyStyle View Post
    No, I'm not reading the article and I'm calling bullshit on it.
    You are living proof that it is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled. Why won't you look at the evidence? What are you afraid of?

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Carbon 14 dating is very accurate for carboniferous samples up to about 4,000 years ago. This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age and provenance. Scientists have attempted to go back further back using tree ring data but this has proved problematic and unreliable.Carbon dating fossils is not possible as there is little or no carboniferous material and there is nothing to use as a reference anyway.
    If the samples tested were as old as atheists claim, there would be no C14 at all. The fact that they found measurable amounts proves that they are not nearly as old as they believe.

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    You are living proof that it is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled. Why won't you look at the evidence? What are you afraid of?
    I don't think you have any evidence, I think you have bullshit.

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    Not only are you lazy, you are dishonest. The testing was performed on many different samples and standard procedures were employed to avoid contamination. I thought you people worshipped science. And yet here you are, refusing to look at scientific evidence because it doesn't fit your atheist narrative. How pathetic. Sucks to be you.
    Grugore, there are cave paintings in France and Spain that are 40,000 years old... a million years after the dinosaurs.

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    27,505
    Thanks
    5,209
    Thanked 7,295 Times in 5,845 Posts
    Groans
    1,263
    Groaned 390 Times in 368 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grugore View Post
    Not only are you lazy, you are dishonest. The testing was performed on many different samples and standard procedures were employed to avoid contamination. I thought you people worshipped science. And yet here you are, refusing to look at scientific evidence because it doesn't fit your atheist narrative. How pathetic. Sucks to be you.
    I'm dishonest? Dinosaurs weren't with us 40,000 years ago. Just stop, you're embarrassing yourself.

  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    19,925
    Thanks
    9,718
    Thanked 8,879 Times in 6,106 Posts
    Groans
    105
    Groaned 594 Times in 580 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    I can believe it.

    Dinosaurs still exist!

    Crocs still crawl the Earth!
    And birds.. Have you seen the fossilized dinosaur nests with dozens of eggs?


  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 442 Times in 356 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 73 Times in 64 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    No real scientist attempts to date dinosaur bones with Carbon 14.
    No real scientist even attempts to date the bones themselves, the material that is actually dated is the rock material surrounding the fossils.
    Based on a quick internet search, there is no evidence a "Dr. Thomas Seiler" has ever published any peer reviewed papers,
    no evidence he is employed at a reputable research institution or university,
    there is no record of his education or qualifications.
    A real scientist has a publication track record, and has reputable professional associations and credentials which should be easily found with google.

    All signs point to fake news, or somebody flat out lying their ass off.
    Dr. Thomas Seiler is a German physicist with a Ph.D. in physics from the University of Munich. He is a development engineer at Robert-Bosch-Corporation since 2004.
    Education: Diploma of Physics from the University of Freiburg, PhD in Physics from the Technical University of Munich

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-22-2017, 01:44 PM
  2. Replies: 147
    Last Post: 11-16-2017, 01:21 PM
  3. Roy Moore: I may have dated teenagers
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 250
    Last Post: 11-13-2017, 03:24 PM
  4. Grind's Dinosaur
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-24-2009, 09:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •