Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 106

Thread: JPP Chickenshi...I mean Conservatives

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default JPP Chickenshi...I mean Conservatives

    And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

    They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

    Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ZappasGuitar For This Post:

    evince (09-15-2017)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Where Woke Goes to Die
    Posts
    14,127
    Thanks
    10,362
    Thanked 8,959 Times in 6,246 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 483 Times in 453 Posts

    Default

    Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Life is Golden For This Post:

    Русский  (09-13-2017)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    4,929
    Thanked 3,685 Times in 2,733 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 707 Times in 647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

    They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

    Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.
    It's almost embarrassing......almost!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to TTQ64 For This Post:

    evince (09-15-2017)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trump Diva View Post
    Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?
    They do, but Zappacrite won't acknowledge that fact, yet he call others cowardly.

    Zappacrite also won't engage I Love America despite numerous direct challenges, yet he call others cowardly.

    Zappacrite claimed that a man was a "Trumpkin" on August 24th and despite being asked for evidence, has provided none, won't admit his error, yet he call others cowardly.

    Thus, ZappasGuitar + hypocrite - Guitar = Zappacrite.

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trump Diva View Post
    Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?
    Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.

    So now, after being cornered, cowardly Zappacrite walks back his oft-proclaimed opinion that anyone who threadbans is "chickenshit".

    Now, it's suddenly a question of degree.

    Tell us, O wise arbiter of all forum morality, what is the acceptable number of people that can be threadbanned with out incurring the scorn of the mighty Zappacrite?

    4? 5? 6?

    Or will you predictably assert that it's the "motivation" that counts?

    Summon your lil ho for a good fluff, Zappacrite. Do you like it when she wears her pink pussy hat?


  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Where Woke Goes to Die
    Posts
    14,127
    Thanks
    10,362
    Thanked 8,959 Times in 6,246 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 483 Times in 453 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.
    But the ones who do are just chickenshits, right?

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trump Diva Redneck Racist View Post
    Do any of the Progressives thread-ban others?
    Only redneck racists like you.
    USFREEDOM911 Expresses one of his homosexual prison rape fantasies;
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    he may be getting several boners, they just won't be his.
    "You got shot in the balls and you're still walking!! Then this probably won't hurt you at all (as he unzips his pants)."




    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I would kill someone who didn't pay me, after I give them a blowjob.
    Does that make me insane?

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,491
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

    They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

    Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.
    zappa, you're like in the top 5 list of one of the LAST people to talk about any kind of derangement syndrome and dissenting opinions. really.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    And just HOW scared of honest dialogue are the usual JPP conservatives/Trumpkins?

    They've dedicated an entire thread to showcasing their Clinton Derangement Syndrome, but STILL just can't stand to have a dissenting opinion distract from their mastabatory Clinton hate/Trump love!

    Yes indeedy, they are most definitely a brave little clutch of Trumpkins.
    Nothing bigoted going on here folks move along. LMAO You certainly are the poster child for left wing "tolerance".

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    Русский  (09-14-2017)

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,856
    Thanks
    13,248
    Thanked 40,793 Times in 32,156 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Not a laundry list of posters like some of the more cowardly JPP Righties do.
    /shrugs......its just a list of folks not worth listening to.....

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Русский  (09-14-2017)

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    So now, after being cornered, cowardly Zappacrite walks back his oft-proclaimed opinion that anyone who threadbans is "chickenshit".

    Now, it's suddenly a question of degree.

    Tell us, O wise arbiter of all forum morality, what is the acceptable number of people that can be threadbanned with out incurring the scorn of the mighty Zappacrite?

    4? 5? 6?

    Or will you predictably assert that it's the "motivation" that counts?

    Summon your lil ho for a good fluff, Zappacrite. Do you like it when she wears her pink pussy hat?

    In your case, as in many of the other banning conservatives, it is in the thirties, and I can't even recall that many left of center posters on this Forum

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    ZappasGuitar (09-14-2017)

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    /shrugs......its just a list of folks not worth listening to.....
    Which in several conservative posters here means anyone who could possible offer an alternative view, that's not a forum but rather talk radio

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to archives For This Post:

    evince (09-15-2017), ZappasGuitar (09-13-2017)

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,856
    Thanks
    13,248
    Thanked 40,793 Times in 32,156 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Which in several conservative posters here means anyone who could possible offer an alternative view, that's not a forum but rather talk radio
    but you're on the list because you aren't worth listening to.......

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Русский  (09-14-2017)

  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Which in several conservative posters here means anyone who could possible offer an alternative view, that's not a forum but rather talk radio
    It's not the "alternative view"; but instead all the other baggage that JPP liberal snowflakes tend to include; unless you're going to try and say that such a thing never happens.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  24. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Русский  (09-14-2017)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2017, 11:22 AM
  2. What conservatives don't get
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-29-2012, 12:18 PM
  3. Conservatives...
    By Bfgrn in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 348
    Last Post: 06-18-2011, 07:40 AM
  4. Fiscal Conservatives in - Social Conservatives out.
    By Socrtease in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 10-10-2010, 10:27 AM
  5. I <3 conservatives
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-02-2010, 03:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •