Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 145

Thread: For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not.....

  1. #121 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    And this is my point exactly. In the eyes of the justice system people are innocent until proven guilty. That does not mean even in a criminal case, that a not guilty verdict is total exoneration.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019)

  3. #122 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    6,115
    Thanks
    17,760
    Thanked 3,240 Times in 2,333 Posts
    Groans
    97
    Groaned 161 Times in 150 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Wow! Jarod don't f-bomb much, he must be triggered!
    “The Communist party must control the guns.”
    ― Mao Tse-tung



    “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”-Generally attributed to Uncle Joe Stalin



    “Everything under heaven is in utter choas; the situation is excellent.”
    ― mao tse-tung

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Callinectes For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (12-09-2019)

  5. #123 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,713
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    They will in 2021, and they will for those who criminally support him.
    Why are they waiting until 2021? States are not bound by the DOJ policy about indicting a sitting president.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-09-2019)

  7. #124 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Why are they waiting until 2021? States are not bound by the DOJ policy about indicting a sitting president.
    Good question, Flash. The witnesses they need from the fed govt will not be available until then because Da Trump will block them from interaction with the state agencies.

    Nice to know they will be on stage in about 14 months.

  8. #125 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,650
    Thanks
    9,766
    Thanked 33,619 Times in 21,482 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    There needs to be no exoneration; because a person is considered INNOCENT, UNTIL proven GUILTY and I would think a self professed lawyer would know that.

    Like OJ? You see that expression is in the eyes of the law, not necessarily in reality.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  9. #126 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,713
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Good question, Flash. The witnesses they need from the fed govt will not be available until then because Da Trump will block them from interaction with the state agencies.

    Nice to know they will be on stage in about 14 months.
    For what crimes?

  10. #127 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,533
    Thanks
    65,160
    Thanked 38,093 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    No, criminal courts do not declare people innocent when they find someone not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, a doubt which could reside in the mind of a single juror.

    It is precisely the erroneous "obverse side of same coin" metaphor Mueller tried to explain away. "Had we been convinced Trump had not committed a crime, we would have so stated" - juries don't do that, they don't address that, the in quotes part.

    I'm surprised you are so thick. Meh, no I'm not.

    Acquittal is not a declaration of innocence.
    Thank you. I knew this but didn't know how to say it the right way.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  11. #128 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    You will be notified at the appropriate time.

  12. #129 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,533
    Thanks
    65,160
    Thanked 38,093 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Castor is turning the GOP into a laughing stock.
    He was horrible. I bet GOP members were clenching their teeth every time he tried to answer a question.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  13. #130 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,533
    Thanks
    65,160
    Thanked 38,093 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    There is a distinction with impeachment though.

    For example, it was an established fact that Clinton committed perjury over sex. The Senate ruled/decided Clinton shouldn’t be removed over that.

    The stunt democrats are trying to pull is to ‘establish the fact of guilt’ in a Senate trial. Notice how Nadler is *lying* about it being ‘a fact’ that Trump bribed/extorted/whatever the Ukrainians. IOW, if Democrats do ever actually vote and it moves to a Senate trial and it’s ruled that democrats can’t establish the fact of guilt—then Trump is effectively ‘exonerated’, innocent as fresh fallen snow or however you want to say it.
    Good to know that RWs can admit Clinton was innocent under law, then.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Cypress (12-09-2019), jimmymccready (12-10-2019)

  15. #131 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    The party's over for the Dems.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  16. #132 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,846
    Thanks
    13,245
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    No, criminal courts do not declare people innocent when they find someone not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, a doubt which could reside in the mind of a single juror.
    and yet, not guilty means not guilty......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  17. #133 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,783
    Thanks
    35,467
    Thanked 50,284 Times in 27,093 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    There is a distinction with impeachment though.

    For example, it was an established fact that Clinton committed perjury over sex. The Senate ruled/decided Clinton shouldn’t be removed over that.

    The stunt democrats are trying to pull is to ‘establish the fact of guilt’ in a Senate trial. Notice how Nadler is *lying* about it being ‘a fact’ that Trump bribed/extorted/whatever the Ukrainians. IOW, if Democrats do ever actually vote and it moves to a Senate trial and it’s ruled that democrats can’t establish the fact of guilt—then Trump is effectively ‘exonerated’, innocent as fresh fallen snow or however you want to say it.
    Perjury is lying under oath with regards to a criminal matter

    Sex between consenting adults is not a crime, and therefore there was no perjury

    And that is why Clinton was never charged with felony perjury in a court of law

    We all know the 1998 blowjob impeachment was really about sex, even if some lack the honesty and forthrightness to admit it

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    jimmymccready (12-10-2019)

  19. #134 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Like OJ? You see that expression is in the eyes of the law, not necessarily in reality.
    Once again, you are looking for an opinion.

    My OPINION has nothing to do with our justice system and someone who claims to be a lawyer should already know this; seeing as how INNOCENT until proven GUILTY, is the corner stone of what the courts are built on.

    INNOCENT, until PROVEN guilty.

    Why do you hate American laws??

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  20. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (12-09-2019)

  21. #135 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Good to know that RWs can admit Clinton was innocent under law, then.
    Show where one "RW" poster, said that.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


Similar Threads

  1. DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends
    By SmarterthanYou in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 1049
    Last Post: 12-30-2019, 12:14 PM
  2. NBC fucks up again.
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-09-2019, 01:14 PM
  3. Silencing Free Speech = Attempting To Remove The Right To Remove Rubbish Forced Into
    By David Jeffrey Spetch in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-09-2019, 01:10 PM
  4. APP - Texas MediCaid refusal affecting Veterans
    By tekkychick in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-03-2013, 10:11 AM
  5. Republican refusal to reveal details
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2012, 03:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •