Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Trump knew exactly what was going on

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Trump knew exactly what was going on

    Lev Parnas, the associate of Rudy Giuliani who has been indicted for campaign finance crimes, called out President Donald Trump directly in a new interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

    The interview, which will air in full Wednesday night, came out the same week in which House investigators released several new troves of evidence — including texts, letters, and hand-written notes — that give a much more detailed look into the background dealings of Trump’s Ukraine scheme than we’ve seen before. Some of those texts indicate that Parnas was texting with someone who surveilled the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. There’s even some indication, though it’s not clear how serious it was, that they may have been considering threats to her security or life. Trump eventually fired the ambassador, a goal Parnas, Rudy Giuliani, and some in Ukraine were seeking.

    “What do you think is main inaccuracy, or the main lie, that’s being told that you feel like you can correct?” Maddow asked Parnas, in a clip first aired on Ari Melber’s “The Beat.”

    “That the president didn’t know what was going on,” Parnas said. “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all of my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020), Trumpet (01-16-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    As did Pompeo and the VP.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    Trumpet (01-16-2020)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,520
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,566 Times in 17,093 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    The whole Trump cabal was involved in pressuring a brand new Ukraine president. They worked together to get a long-time highly respected ambassador out of the way because they knew she would not play ball. Yovanovich had her reputation and career destroyed. Trump does what he wants and defies you to do anything about it.
    Last edited by Nordberg; 01-16-2020 at 12:23 PM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  8. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (01-16-2020)

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

  10. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Toensing



    Victoria Ann Toensing (née Long; born October 16, 1941) is a conservative lawyer, Republican Party operative and partner with her husband, Joseph diGenova, in the Washington law firm diGenova & Toensing.[6][7] The couple reportedly have worked with Rudy Giuliani and Ukrainian interests in support of President Donald Trump.[8][9][7] Toensing and her husband frequently appear on Fox News and Fox Business Channel.[10]

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  12. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (01-16-2020)

  13. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Lev Parnas, the associate of Rudy Giuliani who has been indicted for campaign finance crimes, called out President Donald Trump directly in a new interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

    The interview, which will air in full Wednesday night, came out the same week in which House investigators released several new troves of evidence — including texts, letters, and hand-written notes — that give a much more detailed look into the background dealings of Trump’s Ukraine scheme than we’ve seen before. Some of those texts indicate that Parnas was texting with someone who surveilled the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. There’s even some indication, though it’s not clear how serious it was, that they may have been considering threats to her security or life. Trump eventually fired the ambassador, a goal Parnas, Rudy Giuliani, and some in Ukraine were seeking.

    “What do you think is main inaccuracy, or the main lie, that’s being told that you feel like you can correct?” Maddow asked Parnas, in a clip first aired on Ari Melber’s “The Beat.”

    “That the president didn’t know what was going on,” Parnas said. “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all of my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.
    If it's important now, then it should have been important prior to them voting on the Articles of Impeachment.

    I doubt that they're going to get another "bite at the apple".
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-17-2020)

  15. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    If it's important now, then it should have been important prior to them voting on the Articles of Impeachment.

    I doubt that they're going to get another "bite at the apple".
    This information was not known prior to the voting on the impeachment. Thats just why Nancy did the right thing to wait.

  16. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Parnas is right, and Trump is a criminal.
    Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.


  17. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

  18. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    This information was not known prior to the voting on the impeachment. Thats just why Nancy did the right thing to wait.
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  19. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-17-2020)

  20. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".
    So you don't care if it's true that the POTUS has been lying through his teeth - it's inadmissible, right?

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".

    Just pretend whatever you want.

  22. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,520
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,566 Times in 17,093 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".

    Now rightys are crying about hurrying. Before they cried about why it was taking so long. There is no mulligan. the House can offer a new impeachment if they feel the need.

  23. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,490
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    So you don't care if it's true that the POTUS has been lying through his teeth - it's inadmissible, right?
    I think this is the part where you acknowledge the argument about PROCESS!!!!!!! As in 'had the democrats followed the PROCESS, then they'd have had a much better case for impeachment'...............see how that works?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  24. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,389
    Thanks
    101,920
    Thanked 54,767 Times in 33,631 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    I think this is the part where you acknowledge the argument about PROCESS!!!!!!! As in 'had the democrats followed the PROCESS, then they'd have had a much better case for impeachment'...............see how that works?
    Lol, such a bogus argument. Usually, the DoJ does the investigation, that wasn’t the case because Barr is obstructing. The process was broken before it started, so naturally, the process is different.

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. everyone already KNEW Trump put a hit out on Epstein
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-30-2019, 09:55 AM
  2. Clearly Trump knew this was coming.... Ghina!!!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-04-2019, 12:53 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-06-2019, 04:04 PM
  4. Cohen says trump knew about Trump tower meeting
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-27-2018, 04:29 PM
  5. Everyone knew Trump would win, and that the media was lying
    By TheDonald in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-13-2016, 11:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •