Cypress (08-05-2022)
Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, The Anonymous, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Niche Political Commentor, Superfreak, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, saltydancin, serenity, Yakuda and ParachuteAdams |
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Cypress (08-05-2022)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
PoliTalker (08-05-2022)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
To me actions speak louder than words. But people are complex and can be awake to social injustice in some ways but not others. People can also be awake to social injustice in some circumstances but not in other circumstances. It’s very complex.
I do not understand how being awake to social injustice could ever be considered a negative thing. Unless of course you are a racist, Then I guess you would consider being woke to social justice a negative thing.
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
christiefan915 (08-05-2022), Nomad (08-05-2022)
Nomad (08-05-2022)
If you're so fucking stupid you spell "bear" as "bare", that disqualifies anything else you say from being taken seriously.
Besides, Kavanaugh lied his drunken ass off.
His college roommate said as much.
Plus, he and Barret both lied about respecting precedent.
But then that's what conservatives do.
They lie about everything to get what they want.
C'MON MAN!!!!
I don't really like buzzwords, and Woke is just the latest buzzword Republicans have latched onto to manufacture rage in the MAGA base.
18 months from now, no Republicans are going to be strutting around and derisively invoking the word Woke. It's just the current fad they have been ordered to parrot.
christiefan915 (08-05-2022)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Cypress (08-05-2022)
Recognizing social injustice is one thing. But, there is, like with anything else, the possibility of being over-woke. Or taking wokeness to absurd extremes to the point that you're seeing bogeymen around every corner and calling things racism that, as you said are more complex than that.
I think over-wokeness is a common condition nowadays and, like extremist conservatism, is part of the reason for the social divide in this country.
Nobody wants or even knows how to moderate their views and use common sense.
JMHO.
C'MON MAN!!!!
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
If I want to offer grace I’d say it’s understandable older (white) people might not have heard of the term although it’s been around since at least 2016 (that’s when I first started really hearing it) and was a term used by progressives. So people who are saying they never heard the term until Republicans used within the past year or two live in a serious bubble to me, however offering grace one can say it’s a generational thing. Like a lot of movements they can go too far and get pushback and that’s what has happened to the woke movement.
Bookmarks