Originally Posted by
Flanders
Note that the irrelevant hag is now an elector in NY State:
Almost 4 years of stewing in bitter anger has not softened the edges on Hillary Clinton. Retreating to long walks in the woods and the comforts of Chardonnay has done nothing to mellow her out. On the contrary, with her plastic surgery falling apart, her cackle as robust as ever (a model for Kamala Harris), and her voice still able to strip paint, newly available video of her interview yesterday on Sirius/XM is the perfect warmup for Halloween this weekend
If you dare, 4-plus minutes of video is embedded below, in which she plans on “moving quickly” following the election victory she anticipates, on “the courts” and “ everything, election reform, climate change, COVID relief, expanding healthcare, everything that we care about.”
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._revenge_.html
A local elections board in Pennsylvania filed a motion with the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday requesting that Justice Amy Coney Barrett recuse herself from a high-profile voting rights case that could have a major impact on the 2020 general election.
Recusal for thee but not for me.
Supreme Court justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elana Kagan must recuse themselves from the upcoming decision on homosexual marriage.
The reason is simple: their impartiality on the matter has been hopelessly compromised.
Here’s how Title 28, Part I, Chapter 21, Section 455 of the U.S. Code reads (emphasis mine): “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
Thus any justice who has tipped his hand on how he would vote on gay marriage, any justice who has taken sides, any justice whose ability to be objective on the matter in question, has a legal, moral, ethical and professional duty to withdraw. In fact, he would be violating federal law if he didn’t. His sacred, sworn duty as a justice is to uphold the law, not break it.
Both Kagan and Ginsburg have performed same-sex wedding ceremonies. Ginsburg has at least three and maybe five such ceremonies under her belt, and she had the effrontery to perform one of them in the chambers of the Supreme Court itself.
And lets not forget this one.
The Chicago sewer rat moved into the White House in January of 2009. He signed the healthcare bill on March 24, 2010. Based on dates alone there is no way Justice Thomas was required to recuse himself even if it can be proved he and his wife talked about socialized medicine in a philosophical way.
Obama appointed Elena Kagan solicitor general on Jan. 26, 2009, only days after he took office; so she was there when the Democrats first realized they had a shot at ramming socialized medicine down the country’s throat.
On May 10, 2010, forty-seven days after singing Hillarycare II, Obama nominated Kagan to the Supreme Court. Even if you accept Kagan’s dates as a coincidence, there is e-mail evidence that she should have recused herself. There is nothing to suggest that Justice Thomas was legally, or ethically, obligated to recuse himself.
Bookmarks