CrowdStrike Revises Russian Hack Into Ukrainian Artillery
https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/0...ian-artillery/
Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike recently revised a report from December that insisted that the group “Fancy Bear,” which has ties to Russian intelligence, used malware to hack into Ukrainian artillery. In the same report, the firm said “Fancy Bear” used the same malware to “hack” into the American election.
Well, British think tank International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) found that CrowdStrike “erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion.” This also calls into question its findings of meddling in our election.
~~~
CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims
https://www.realclearinvestigations....ng_claims.html
While the 448-page Mueller report found no conspiracy between Donald Trump's campaign and Russia, it offered voluminous details to support the sweeping conclusion that the Kremlin worked to secure Trump's victory.
The report claims that the interference operation occurred "principally" on two fronts:
1. Russian military intelligence officers hacked and leaked embarrassing Democratic Party documents,
2.and a government-linked troll farm orchestrated a sophisticated and far-reaching social media campaign that denigrated Hillary Clinton and promoted Trump.
But a close examination of the report shows that none of those headline assertions are supported by the report’s evidence or other publicly available sources. They are further undercut by investigative shortcomings and the conflicts of interest of key players involved:
Bookmarks