Science says life begins at conception, or when the egg is fertilized. The "new morality", or lack of morals, says no.
https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-s...an-life-begins
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
It's killing a baby -- legal or not. It's murder. When you snuff out a life, it is murder. How do you describe it? An exercise in health?
I think you know it's murder and you're trying to convince yourself it's okay to advocate killing a baby. It must haunt any woman who does it in the worst way.
So don't do it. And now you're done, finished, there's the line.It's killing a baby -- legal or not. It's murder. When you snuff out a life, it is murder. How do you describe it? An exercise in health?
I think you know it's murder and you're trying to convince yourself it's okay to advocate killing a baby. It must haunt any woman who does it in the worst way.
what happens inside someones body is none of your fucking business
letting government officials define things for you that you would normally know just by normal intelligence is the sign of a weak mind and constitution. We all know that 'shall not be infringed' means that the federal government has NO POWER over firearms, but hearing someone in government say 'no right is absolute' and 'reasonable restrictions' satisfies the cowardly notion of safety, so the new definition is accepted. just remember, if no right is absolute, then abortion can be regulated.....it's just a matter of how much regulation the government wants to enforce.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks