evince (08-02-2018)
Is that your current tactic to meddle the water?
Trump: I'm 'concerned' Russia may interfere in midterms to help Democrats
BY BRETT SAMUELS - 07/24/18 11:58 AM EDT
Trump's latest absurd Tweet/Lie
I’m very concerned that Russia will be fighting very hard to have an impact on the upcoming Election. Based on the fact that no President has been tougher on Russia than me, they will be pushing very hard for the Democrats. They definitely don’t want Trump!
11:50 AM - Jul 24, 2018
The Appeaser in Chief/Putin's Puppet has lost what little mind he had left.
Thoughts about his "Toughness" towards Hitler....oops.....Putin?
Nobody has been tougher? Trump says the stupidest shit and his followers buy it every time. Trump attacked NATO and European allies like a Putin puppet would. Trump flipped the world connections over and over to Russia's adbvantage.
confound black and white
Obviously, Trump and his mastermind knew or had hacked Clinton's emails already. (US politicians are under surveillance of the Feds(the FBI)). Trump's call for Russian's hacking was a practice to call for a hostile country to frame an US politician's campaign activity. That's a collusion with hostile foreign nation. What Clinton have done? Did she invite Russian to hack her emails? It's like a lady put her money in purse not in Safe for convenience. Her rival knew it and bribed a thief to steal the money. So in this case, Clinton was a victim. The Feds and Trump 's tactic was to frame Clinton in a "treasonous" case. That's how Clinton was blamed "treason" and even was threatened to be put in prison by Trump. But who was real "treason"? Who called for Russians? Why did Russians obeyed the order? It's very obvious. The strange thing is, such a clear thing has been meddling for years. Because this country is ruled by a Deep State which manipulate the government system and media.
if it were Hillary instead of Daffy doing this shit, the rightys would be clutching their flags and constitutions and demanding impeachment. When trump does such horrible things, they accept it and laud it. No president has used clearances as a method to punish. No president would interject in an ongoing trial. Nixon slipped and said that Manson was guilty and we were all worried that it might result in a mistrial. A president can effect a trial. So all presidents are very careful to say nothing. Trump just blabs away. And you assholes do not care.
And Trump is directly involved in the case. How much more wrong could trump be?
Last edited by Nordberg; 08-19-2018 at 12:02 PM.
Inside Putin's feared GRU spy network that casts a shadowy web of covert operations across the globe and whose agents are blamed by Mueller for trying to influence the 2016 US election
Special Counsel handed down indictments against 12 members of the GRU
Full name is Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces
An afterthought in USSR , it is now country's largest foreign intelligence agency
By ARIEL ZILBER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and REUTERS 17 July 2018
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...m=rta-fallback
Ex-FBI agent: Trump got elected, thanks to Russia
David Knowles,Yahoo News •August 1, 2018
“Yes. I think just alone the hacking, particularly of the DNC and the time to release by WikiLeaks and DCLeaks and others of hacked materials offset the media narrative,” Watts, who has been an outspoken critic of the current president, told “Bots & Ballots” host Grant Burningham.
For many agents in the FBI, Watts said it became clear that the biggest goal for “active measures” was advancing Trump’s presidential bid, in part by utilizing vulnerable social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.
“By the time 2016 came around, it was very clear that they had four campaign messages that they wanted to push. The first one was very anti-Hillary Clinton, and that was from the beginning. The second one was very pro-Trump,” Watts said. “The third one was when the hacking kicked in, which was that Bernie Sanders got a raw deal from the DNC, and you can see that in these hacked emails. That’s really when we started to see that hacking was starting to power influence. And the last one, which was very minor, was that you still need to show up for Jill Stein. So, the equation was quite clear, it was how do we elevate Trump to the top spot and sort of suppress Clinton turnout and people wanting to support her.”
In “Messing With the Enemy,” his new book on modern cyberwarfare campaigns, Watts said that the election results in traditionally Democratic states like Michigan and Wisconsin prove just how effective the Russian campaign was. Still, Watts notes that because of incomplete social media data and notoriously inaccurate polling, that it’s “almost impossible to prove one way or another whether Russia won the election” for Trump. What is clear is that Trump’s election was itself a victory for Moscow.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-fbi-ag...090006587.html
G.R.U. is a military spy organization. It doesn't work for individual deal. Because Trump has spy back ground, so Russian took over the deal. But could Russian really manipulate US voters? I don't think so. What the Feds needed was an excuse to justify Trump's victory. Russia was just a scapegoat.
To send an unqualified man to the seat of President, they need a rigged election. In US, they pick up president by rigged election because they control the spy system.(FBI) And justify the result by poll because they control the media. (controlled by the Feds too) This time is particular one so they bought Russia to meddle the water.
Bookmarks