Must be terrible to walk around with all that hate. Bigots are so proud of hating and wonder why don't all hate like them. Some of us really don't hate like you do. You must see so many enemies everywhere you go. That must be weird .
Must be terrible to walk around with all that hate. Bigots are so proud of hating and wonder why don't all hate like them. Some of us really don't hate like you do. You must see so many enemies everywhere you go. That must be weird .
If the pie gets smaller because those relying on someone else won't do for themselves, there won't be anything for them to get unless they earn it. Since most of them are entitlement minded and don't have a clue that in order for them to get what they have someone else had to pay for it, maybe they think the government simply prints money so they can get "paid".
Are you saying someone that earned it and wants to keep it is greedy but someone that didn't earn it yet somehow thinks a portion is their isn't greedy?
How can wealth be transferred to someone that would be hundreds of years old? I see, you're one of those that thinks people who weren't slaves should be handed something funded by those that never owned slaves.
Guno צְבִי (07-20-2018)
Tell me, did they not "earn" by enslaving others, and profiting from their labor? And the ones that inherited this "earned" wealth how did they do so save for the right of inheritance? If the hears to that wealth can just receive it without working for it, then why cannot the heirs of the slaves that created it? Is that beyond your understanding? Jefferson, and Madison, understood it, and got laws passed in Va that eliminated transference of inherited wealth. Then too, they opposed income inequality (as did Christ) declaring that a Republic could not survive under such conditions.
Just another fact for your usual limited intellect, once you're dead you ain't "keeping it".
Have you ever read Adam Smith, and his "Wealth of Nations", or his "Theory of Moral Sentiments"? Jefferson, and the Founders did, and agreed with it.
https://www.economist.com/lexingtons...ke-it-with-you
https://www.goodreads.com/work/quote...ral-sentiments
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Guno צְבִי (07-20-2018)
Guno צְבִי (07-20-2018)
Pap always made it a point to acknowledge.....the obvious, "THE SMELLER IS ALWAYS THE FELLER"..... in layman's term "He who smelt it dealt it". The left always attacks the thing they fear the most. In this case....its obvious, the left FEARS white evangelicals. What you should be fearing as a warmongering left wing secular humanist...….is not White Evangelical Christians.....but one of the most religious and faithful cultures on earth. Latin Americans. What...…. are you attempting to propagate the false premise that Latin America is best represented by Gangs like MS 13, Gun runners, kidnappers, drug dealers...etc.?
If not.....just why should White Christians Fear Brown, Black, Red, Yellow, or any other color culture of humanity that examples religion? The truth of the matter is the fact that those of a Religious nature far outnumber the human seculars around the globe....where 8 out of every 10 people identify as being part of some religious movement. Snowflake logic
Last edited by Ralph; 07-19-2018 at 11:20 AM.
Guno צְבִי (07-19-2018)
Bookmarks